Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates'last days
Socrates critique of democracy the republic
Socrates'last days
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socrates'last days
David depicts the last moments of Socrates’s life. He is surrounded by the people who believe and love him; these people include his wife/family and followers. His students are unhappy, some are looking away others are holding their face in disbelief and despair. He is seated up in the middle of his bed reaching for the cup holding the poison that is supposed to kill him and is speaking or teaching to his students. You can see in the background past the archway his wife leaving the scene being escorted up the stairs so she won’t have to witness her husband’s death.
Socrates was a philosopher who taught his devoted pupils the importance and methods to obtain knowledge and ethics. He was an anti-democratic philosopher who disagreed with how society was run and turned many people in the city against him. He was sentenced to death by the Athenian court for being guilty of “corrupting the youth” and “refusing to recognize the gods recognized by
…show more content…
Jacques uses realistic style and stays true to the proportions of the real word. You can get a glimpse of how true these proportions are by looking at Socrates himself. His improperly fastened toga falls on to his lap to reveal his proper form and toned body. His arm that is reaching for the cup of poison and his relaxed leg that extends on the bed have muscle definition even at rest. David also uses representational style; the viewer is able to recognize with certainty the objects that were painted in scene because it exists in the real world. Neoclassicism is the movement style David uses to guide his work. Some characteristics of the movement style was to draw narratives with large groups of people, and flashy drapery, which are all apparent in The Death of Socrates. Neo-classical art was also a period style taking place during the French revolution. During the last years of the French revolution neo-classical art
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
The artists Jean-Honore Fragonard and Jaques-Louis David both successfully embody their respective stylistic differences. Fragonard’s style of painting is Rococo, which is characterized by its softness, asymmetry and curviness. Contrasting these ideals is David’s style of painting, Neo-Classicism. Neo-Classicism is synonymous with strong gestures, symmetry, and solidness. Two works that best exemplify the ideals of each style of painting are Fragonard’s The Swing, 1767 and David’s The Death of Socrates, 1787. Although at first glance, it is easier to focus on how each work is different to the other, one can argue that they are similar in theme. Both The Swing and The Death of Socrates are works that deal with the theme of decision making. However, they differ in how each work portrays the theme of deciding. While The Swing focuses on infidelity and the process of deciding, The Death of Socrates makes it clear that loyalty to government is stronger than the ties of friendship or acquaintance. By examining use of light, form, subject matter as well as other artistic elements, one can see how each artist conveys a message by utilizing their style of art.
Socrates lived such a private life that it lead to the most important revelation of his entire life. He would go about his life doing nothing but self-examination. In examining his life so strenuously others would come to him to be taught, or to have their children be taught by Socrates. They would offer him money and he would refuse. They would do whatever they could to learn anything Socrates had to teach. What they did not know is that Socrates was not teaching anyone he was simply going about his usual life and people just happened to learn from it. This was also why Socrates was put on trial. He was brought up on two charges, one of impiety and the other of corrupting the youth. These two charges set the course for the last month of his life.
The main theme behind the "Phaedo" is Socrates' readiness and willingness to die, because of his belief of immortality. Socrates believed that when his body ceased to exist anymore, that his soul would leave and join that of the forms, where he would be eternally. Socrates believed so strongly in this, that not only did he not fear his death, he welcomed it. He believed that only when the soul separated from the body, is a person able to be truly enlightened and gain all knowledge. This "enlightenment" has been Socrates' life long goal of discovering the truth. Even at his hour of death, Socrates showed no hesitation. However, Socrates' friends did not believe so strongly, and took some great convincing by Socrates, to allow his friends to be okay with his death. The two proofs that Socrates used to convince his friends are the "Doctrine of Opposites" and the "simple and composite theory.
Socrates was a revolutionary thinker. He brought new ideas and processes of thought to Athenian society and his work still has its place in the world today. However during his time, his ideas were not always thought of as a good thing. Many viewed him as a corrupting influence on other people and accused him of forcing his ideas upon others. Perhaps most frequently the center of controversy was his thoughts on theocracy and piety as seen in the Plato’s Euthyphro. Socrates also appears at the butt end of Aristophanes’ comedy Clouds, where he is satirically ridiculed and seemingly corrupting the youth of Athens in his school, the Thinkery. Although virtually completely seen as a positive influence now, in ancient times, Socrates may have done more harm than good for his society.
In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled “The Apology”; Socrates claims in his defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death.
Socrates, according to Plato challenged the norms of society by questioning life and having others question it as well. He was labeled of “corrupting the youth” and for not believing in the Athenians gods. “Socrates is guilty of corrupting the young, and of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead.” (The Apology, pp 654) Although, he was cast by being “corrupt”, Socrates had many followers that saw him as a wise man. Socrates trial was made up of thirty jurors, who were later known as “The Thirty.” The “Thirty” really wanted was to silence Socrates, rather than taking his life. However, Socrates did not want to disobey the laws, he did not want to be violated of his right to freedom of speech, nor did he did he want to be undermine his moral position. (The Apology, pp. 647) He stood against injustice acts several times while he was in counsel. “I was the sort...
In conclusion, Socrates was guilty of inventing his own deity, which violated the Athenian laws and the general moral principle held by Athenians, though his main purpose was to improve the society and educate the youth through questioning. However, he was a great citizen and thinker in ancient Athens, since he developed a new value system which did guide the people to the truth and rightness, despite the fact that some part of defense was not convincing and involved sophistry. In addition, the legal system of Athens had some defects for it let the majority rather than professional judges or lawmakers make judgment, leading to the tragedy of Socrates’ death.
David created an organized painting in a scene set in, what seems be a Roman atrium that is dominated by three arches in the background which keeps our attention focused on the main subject in the foreground. In this Artwork we see a group of three young men that are framed by the first arch that lay in the background behind them. The Horatii brothers, seem bound together with their muscled arms raised in a salute toward their father whom is framed by the central arch. The father holds three swords in his left hand and raises his right hand to signifying a promise or some sort of sacrifice. The male figures create tense, geometric forms that stand in contrast to the softly curved feminine poses of the women who are situated behind the father. The figures have a clinical light that sharply contrasts the heightened drama of the scene portrayed in the artwork, thus requiring the viewer to respond to the scene with rationality.
Socrates was a Greek philosopher and teacher. His teachings, life and death have made him one of the most admired people in history. Although he wrote no books or developed a regular school of thought, his influence inspired others to. Socrates affected the entire course of Western thought. I believe Socrates to be one of the most important philosophers ever.
David was a pioneer for the Neo-Classical movement in France and began this style after returning from Rome where he studied for several years. This style differed greatly from the Rococo period which typically featured the frivolity of the aristocracy. David set the tone for the Neo-Classical style in this painting by implying several different techniques. One of these techniques, was the influence of Greek and Roman style/architecture, which can be seen in the columns in the background. The story featured is also a morally-based story that is historic, another common aspect of that period. Other techniques that David uses in this piece include dull colors, excluding the bright red used in the center to draw attention to the father, as well as the symbolism of three, where he places all of the elements of the composition in threes (three brothers, three swords, three women, three arches).
Socrates is known as the “father of Western philosophy”. In his teachings, he encouraged people to question life and not listen to what they were told. He inspired people to search for answers, and reject popular beliefs. Socrates was very inquisitive and had a method to help search for answers while educating his audience. Socrates used this approach when he was brought to trial. Because of his unconventional teachings, the dikasts (male jurors) charged Socrates with corrupting the youth and not believing in the state’s gods.
The Bible takes a unique turn in the book of 1 Samuel, Israel requests the appointment of an earthly king. The prophet Samuel warned them against trading their Divine King for an earthy one. In Matthew 7:13 Jesus told us, “..For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction..,” cautioning believers not to long to be like everyone else.
Socrates was a philosopher who set out to prove, to the gods, that he wasn't the wisest man. Since he could not afford a "good" Sophist teacher, surely a student of one had to be smarter than he. He decides to converse with the youth of Athens, but concludes that he actually is wiser than everyone he speaks with. He then realizes that their lack of intelligence is the fault of their teachers. Socrates understands that the practice of "sophism" leads to a lack of self-knowledge and moral values. Socrates was later accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and put on trial. In The Apology of Socrates he sta...
Socrates was an insightful philosopher who had an opinion on all the basic fundamental questions. He had very strong beliefs that he willed others into believing through questioning and proving ignorance in others beliefs. He has particular views on every fundamental question and particular views on how people should live their lives. He says God has spoken to him about philosophy and says that it is his destiny and it is his calling in life. Through philosophy he searches for answers to the fundamental questions and gains wisdom and knowledge. The fundamental question of condition is the question of what, if anything, has gone wrong with the world? The question of solution is what can fix the problem? Then there is Death which asks what happens