J. B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls

1527 Words4 Pages

The mystery and intrigue that surround Priestley's Inspector Goole allow for a deceptively complex character. Written in 1945, An Inspector Calls, a social commentary that critiques the capitalist attitudes of 1912 British society, was first performed in communist Russia due to backlash from London’s artistic community. The inspector plays a cardinal role as the voice of the working class and a messenger of God, presenting Priestley’s socialist views in a positive light. Priestley presents Inspector Goole as an omniscient agent of God. Stage directions instruct directors to make the “pink and intimate” lighting “brighter and harder” upon the inspector’s arrival, which represents the new light to be shed on the Birling’s actions. Biblically, …show more content…

The inspector “speaks weightily,” while Mr. Birling is lengthy and frivolous. The adverb “Weightily’ suggests that the inspector’s message is important and serious. This could be interpreted as the inspector having ‘the weight of the world on his shoulders’: the inspector is implied to be speaking for “millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths” and talks about “their lives, hopes and fears. suffering,. happiness”. The repetition of “millions” shows his message’s importance as it emphasises the huge number of working class people who are often ignored. By taking into account these “millions” and their “lives, hopes and fears”, he is speaking for them, thus taking on a huge responsibility that could ‘weigh’ heavily on him. It also reflects their reliance on him as a messenger, as their voices are often disregarded, which can lead to them ending up dead and/or destitute, like Eva Smith. Both polysyndetic and asyndetic listing is used, adding to the ‘weight’ of his message as it makes his responsibilities seem endless or huge. Thus, it becomes apparent that the inspector is altruistic. In comparison, Arthur Birling tells Gerald and Eric that “There’s a good deal of silly talk about these days - but - and I speak as a hard-headed businessman, who has to take risks and know what he’s about”. He dismisses others' opinions, describing them as "silly," a stark contrast to the inspector speaking …show more content…

According to stage directions, the inspector responds “dryly” to Mr. Birling's threats of involving Inspector Goole’s superior “chief constable, Colonel Roberts" who plays golf with Mr. Birling, stating “I don’t play golf." Here, golf is a metaphor for social standing and power, so the ‘dry’ tone suggests that he is unfazed by Mr. Birling’s higher social status, despite Mr. Birling’s attempts at intimidating him into stopping his inquiry about Mr. Birling’s business. The Inspector finding this ironic and/or humorous implies that he has the upper hand, which could be because the inspector knows information about the Birlings, which could cause a scandal, thus lowering their social status or ruining Mr. Birling’s chances at knighthood. Social status is very important to the family, as shown through Mr. Birling’s ostentatious attitudes and fanciful speech, a reflection on the superficial values favoured by people of his class; value comes from monetary value and hereditary titles instead of the content of people’s character. Inspector Goole’s attitude towards Mr. Birling’s threats, despite awareness of the Birlings' social status, exhibits his apathy towards social class and the social norms placed on himself as someone who is of a lower class. This ties in to the overall message of the play - a social commentary on the dangers and redundancy of the class system. Later on in the play, when Mrs.

Open Document