Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis heart of darkness
Critical analysis heart of darkness
Critical analysis heart of darkness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical analysis heart of darkness
Thomas Carlyle, a Scottish writer, once said, “isolation is the sum total of wretchedness to a man.” When comparing this statement to Heart of Darkness it is completely true. In the novella Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad the protagonist, Charlie Marlow, leaves his familiar society for his new job. In order to maintain sanity while isolated from society he dehumanizes the strange people he encounters while there. Heart of Darkness is about the affect of isolation on a person and this novella is best described by the word dehumanizing. Marlow, the Russian, and the natives dehumanize the people around them in order to give themselves hope and to shield themselves from the horror around them.
Charlie Marlow dehumanizes the natives in order to create an emotional barrier between his job and what he witnesses. He has a set of solid beliefs, one of them being that whites are superior to Africans. When Marlow is first at the station, he spies a big shade tree in the distance and decides to investigate. Marlow goes under the tree and finds many African people moaning and waiting to die. Marlow explains, “’They were not enemies, they were not criminals, there were nothing earthly now-nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom’” (Conrad 85). Marlow is struck with horror by this awful sight, but by referring to the natives as only shadows he attempts to detach himself from what he is really seeing. These people symbolize nothing more than shadows to Marlow. By believing this it makes the sight of watching these men die a little less painful and disturbing. Marlow’s natural instinct is to classify a person as a friend or foe and the fact that he cannot label these people as either proves...
... middle of paper ...
... to keep hope.
Thomas Carlyle was correct because Charlie Marlow tries to hold onto his set beliefs in order to avoid the “wretchedness” associated with isolationism. In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, Charlie Marlow is faced with new isolating events in Africa, but he dehumanizes the strange people he encounters while there to remain sane. Heart of Darkness is about a person’s tendency to dehumanize others in isolating situations. Charlie Marlow, the Russian, and the natives give themselves hope and shield themselves from what is going on around them by dehumanizing the people around them.
Works Cited
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness and The Secret Sharer. New York: Simon and Schuster
Paperbacks, 2004. Print.
"Isolation Quotes." Famous Quotes and Quotations at BrainyQuote. Web. 01 Feb. 2010.
.
Conrad’s character Marlow describes the natives as having “a wild vitality” and their “faces like grotesque masks.” These remarks demonstrate his fear and reinforces the distinction between himself and the natives.
Conrad’s main character Marlow is the narrator for most of the story in Heart of Darkness. He is presented as a well-intentioned person, and along his travels he is shocked by the cruelties that he sees inflicted on the native people. Though he is seemingly benevolent and kindly, Marlow shows the racism and ignorance of Conrad and in fact of the majority of white people in his era, in a more subtle way. Marlow uses words to describe the blacks that, though generally accepted in his time, were slanderous and crude. He recalls that some of the first natives he saw in the Congo looked at him “with that complete, deathlike indifference of unhappy savages” (80; part 1). Marlow casually refers to the Africans with the most offensive of language: “Strings of dusty niggers arrived and departed…” (83; part 1). To Marlow, and thus to Conrad, the Africans are savages, dogs, devils, and criminals. Even the stories that Conrad creates for Marlow to narrate are twisted and false. The natives that Marlow deals with in the book are described as cannibals, and they are even given dialogue that affirms th...
While many characters are critiqued or criticized by Conrad for their exploitation of Africa and it's inhabitants, they remain the dominant and superior race, both according to Conrad, and his primary narrator Charlie Marlow. The African characters are not only constructed as "other", but also as inferior and to an extent subhuman. This is evident through their lack of language or voice throughout the text. Africans are denied language, and are instead granted "grunting" noises and a "violent babble of mouth sounds" relegating them to an inferior status.
During the novella we see many quotes made by Marlow and others that relate to racism towards the native Africans. In the first section of the story we see some comments that relate
Many authors argue that Conrad was racist throughout his writing of the book, which came out through his main character Marlow and the way that he presented himself. A large racial contrast in the book was between the white people like Marlow and the black slaves of Africa. This opposition is shown through the white “pilgrims” and the black “cannibals.” Marlow describes a pilgrim in the story as a rough and disorderly man who is a: “bloodthirsty little gingery beggar”(67). Whereas he describes a cannibal as a quiet man who has control and is essentially the opposite of how pilgrims are described. This interesting because cannibals are usually known as humans that eat other human beings, so having pilgrims described as “bloodthirsty” shows an ironic contradiction. The connotations associated with these terms are ironic because during this time period, white men were usually described as having control over black people and black people could be described as beggars. Yet, Conrad chooses to give the opposite connotations to the pilgrims and cannibals in his story.
1. The protagonist of Heart of Darkness is a person named Charlie Marlow. Oddly, his name only appears once in the novel. Marlow is philosophical, independent-minded, and generally skeptical of those around him. He is also a master storyteller, eloquent and able to draw his listeners into his tale. Although Marlow shares many of his fellow Europeans’ prejudices, he has seen enough of the world and enough debased white men to make him skeptical of imperialism. An example of Marlow being independent-minded and philosophical is when he takes a trip up a river, as a break from working on ships. Marlow describes the trip as a journey back in time, to a “prehistoric earth.” This remark on how he regards colonized people as primitive, which is his philosophical viewpoint.
Marlow then proceeds to head for the Congo, and when he finally reaches the company's lower station he begins to see how the white man has come to try and civilize and control the wildness of Africa and its inhabitants. The blacks were being used as slaves at the station to build railroads. The scene left Marlow feeling that the blacks "were not enemies, they were not criminals, they were nothing earthly now,--nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation" (p. 2202). Marlow sees how the asserted superiority of the white man has led to the devastation of the black natives in both spirit and body.
Mental and physical health can be so easily affected by an environment. In the Heart of Darkness, Conrad really emphasizes just how easily one can be affected mentally and physically by darkness. Through the characters in his book, he shows that darkness can abandon one of their physical health and provide them with an open mind that can so simply be filled with the darkness they are surrounded by. The health of the entire body is easily sabotaged in the affects of darkness and illness.
By far, Marlow is the most sympathetic and reliable character of Heart of Darkness - he even goes so far as to offer a native slave one of his biscuits, disturbed as he is by their suffering. Furthermore, he is not an apathetic character - his characterizations of the people around him, black or white, are apt and cutting, as when he describes a white companion as “too fleshy” (Conrad, 23) or the Company’s chief accountant as a “hairdresser’s dummy” (Conrad, 21). Clearly, he is observant, sensitive. A callousness begins in him, though, subtly, from tossing the dead native overboard when the other white men found a burial more suitable, to his time in the depths of Kurtz’s Congo. Upon seeing pikes adorned with severed heads, he is “not so shocked as you may think. The start back… was really nothing but a movement of surprise” (Conrad, 55). This Marlow is removed from the “horror-stuck” (Conrad, 21) individual that fed the starving native. His corruption could be the most implacable in Heart of Darkness, but it is, in fact, there when he loses his will in response to the trauma, the agony of the Congo. His experience with disgust in Chapter 3 is laced with weariness, with detachment. Like the hollow men’s response to the trauma of war, Marlow is made desensitized and corrupt. The hollow men “grope together and avoid speech,” and Marlow avoids speaking the truth, preferring to falsify Kurtz’s final words to his fiancee, to protect the identity of Kurtz when, perhaps, the Marlow that “hate[d], detest[ed], and [couldn’t] bear a lie” (Conrad, 29) would have been disgusted to do
One interpretation of Marlow's relationship to colonialism is that he does not support it. Conrad writes, "They were not enemies, they were not criminals, they were nothing earthly now,-nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom" (p. 27-28). Marlow says this and is stressing that the so-called "savages", or Africans, are being treated and punished like they are criminals or enemies when in fact they never did anything. He observes the slow torture of these people and is disgusted with it. Marlow feels sympathy for the black people being slaved around by the Europeans but doesn't do anything to change it because that is the way things are. One can see the sympathy by the way that he gives a starving black man one of his biscuits. "To tear treasure out of the bowels of the land was their desire, with no moral purpose at the back of it than there is in burglars breaking into a safe" (p. 54). This statement by Marlow conveys that he doesn't believe that the Europeans have a right to be stripping Africa of its riches. He views the Jungles of Africa as almost it's own living, breathing monster.
In Heart of Darkness and The Stranger Joseph Conrad and Albert Camus manipulate different styles of language and structure, yet both emphasize the isolation of the protagonists from society. In Heart of Darkness Conrad employs descriptive language and metaphors about society while using minor roles in order to display Marlow’s isolation. Meanwhile in The Stranger Camus structures the story in two parts to capture both sides of Meursault yet still develops a simple and direct writing style throughout the story to keep the theme of isolation. Through the theme of isolation both Conrad and Camus present the idea that life can be meaningless if not shared with the company of others.
The "Heart of Darkness," written by Joseph Conrad in 1899 as a short story, is about two men who face their own identities as what they consider to be civilized Europeans and the struggle to not to abandon their themselves and their morality once they venture into the "darkness." The use of "darkness" is in the book's title and in throughout the story and takes on a number of meanings that are not easily understood until the story progresses. As you read the story you realize that the meaning of "darkness" is not something that is constant but changes depending on the context it used.
At the beginning of the novel, Marlow is traveling the jungle and the many scenes of life can be seen. Africa has seems to be taken over by many travelers which makes one wonder what is there ulterior motive? Africa is a third world country, which makes it easy for someone to come in and talk on their soapbox. It is very easy to tell that these men are not the biggest fans of colored people, so it is plausible that they have come to instill a sense of imperialism. As Marlow passes through the waters of the Congo it is easily visible the trouble of the natives. “Black shapes crouched, lay, sat between the trees, leaning against the trunks, clinging to the earth half coming out, half effaced with the dim light, in all the attitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair.” (20) Show that the holding of these colonies has started. The soldiers have come in and taken the inhabitants and are destroying them and taking from them the one thing they deserve over everything, life. The imperialists seem to not care about the Africans and are just there for their land.
Heart of Darkness is a story in which racism presents itself so deliberately that, for many, the dilemma of race must be tackled before anything else in the book may be dealt with. Conrad used derogatory, outdated and offensive terminology for devaluation of people’s color as savages. This use of language disturbs many readers who read this book.
Despite the opinion of certain critics, Conrad did not create Marlow to be a prejudice character. One of his first Marlow?s first Reactions to the villagers is the exact opposite, ?They were not enemies they were not criminals??(Conrad, 189) While his initial response may not seem altogether accepting, it is far beyond the understanding of his peers. As the story continues Marlow is slightly sarcastic in his understanding of the villagers, ?Fine fellows-Cannibals-in their place. They were men one could work with, and I am grateful to them. And, after all, they did not eat each other before my face? (189)? Marlow shows his ability to be sarcastic in the face of popular criticism, even making the mold step to refer to these African?s as ?Fine Fellows?(189), ?They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the thought of they humanity-like yours-the thought of your remote kinship with this wild??(189) Although the natives...