Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crucible arthur miller prominent archetypes
Characters and their characterisations in play Crucible by Arthur Miller
The crucible arthur miller sparknotes tragic heroes essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The crucible arthur miller prominent archetypes
In Equus and The Stranger, authors Peter Shaffer and Albert Camus create an absence of passion and love for their characters of Dysart and Meursault through characterization and overall tone of the text, which creates isolated characters. Camus and Shaffer manipulate the characters relationships with women to prove the lack of love. The authors also demonstrate the lack of passion throughout the text, and later it confirms the overall affect it has on both of the characters lives, even though they end results are different.
Camus and Shaffer develop relationships with women that lack real love to show how the characters of Meursault and Dysart have no real affection in their lives. The relationships of the characters, when carefully observed are very different. Dysart has a loveless relationship with his wife. Throughout the play Dysart will mention his wife and explain how they have no affection towards each other, and how they never really had a relationship to begin with. He mentions, “We were brisk in our wooing, brisk in our wedding, brisk in our disappointment” (Shaffer, 57). Dysart tells the audience that, “My wife doesn’t understand me, Your Honour” (57), speaking to another female friend about his wife. Shaffer creates a sort of irritation in Dysart because he doesn’t have love from his spouse. At a one point he states, “I watch that woman knitting, night after night-a woman I haven’t kissed in six years…” (81). Shaffer creates this hopeless love because it increases the lack of passion felt by Dysart; it frustrates him to a level where he can’t really comprehend.
Meursault’s careless attitude affects the people around and his relationship with those characters. When he and Marie begin their romance, he doesn’t reall...
... middle of paper ...
... cries of hate.”(123). He believes that this will make his living worthwhile and that he will die a happy man if this is accomplished. In comparison to Dysart, Meursault chose lack of love and passion for himself and was content with it.
In the end, the readers of both the texts can see that there are similarities between the texts, yet the differences are also visible. In the texts, the authors create a lack of passion and love for their characters of Dysart and Meursault through characterization and overall tone of the text, which created isolated characters. This aids the readers of to better understand why the authors placed certain techniques throughout the texts and why they were important.
Works Cited
Camus, Albert. The Stranger. Trans. Matthew Ward. New York: Vintage International,
1988.
Shaffer, Peter. Equus. New York, Scribner, 1973.
In order to understand what changes happen to twist the views of the 2 main characters in both novels, it is important to see the outlook of the two at the beginning of the novels in comparison ...
Meursault is a fairly average individual who is distinctive more in his apathy and passive pessimism than in anything else. He rarely talks because he generally has nothing to say, and he does what is requested of him because he feels that resisting commands is more of a bother than it is worth. Meursault never did anything notable or distinctive in his life: a fact which makes the events of the book all the more intriguing.
Meursault, an unemotional, a moral, sensory-orientated character at the beginning of the book, turns into an emotional, happy man who understands the "meaninglessness" and absurdity of life by the end of the book. Meursault realizes that the universe is indifferent to man's life and this realization makes him happy. He realizes that there is no God and that the old codes of religious authoritarianism are not enough to suffice man's spiritual needs. One has to create one's won meaning in an absurd, meaningless world.
Meursault “exemplifies a dangerous inauthenticity and isolation” (Schneider et al. 182) from the very beginning of the book. The detachment, from Maman’s death, illustrates to the reader that he is not normal. The main character’s
However, upon deciding to kill a man, he quickly learns that his previous unconcern will not diminish the consequences for his deed. Put to death, Meursault remains stagnant on his opinion of justice, refusing to ever consider that justice possesses any worth. Upon receiving a visit from a chaplain hours before his execution, he merely uttered “I had been right, I was still right, I was always right” (Camus 121) Meursault did not understand why the chaplain wanted to force him to turn to God and gain a moral sense about life. Thus he simply reiterated the motto that he lived by: an apathetic, self-absorbed idea that nothing in life means anything. Meursault’s continual refusal to accept the moral standards of the world prohibited him from every truly finding a true sense of
Both Equus and The Stranger specifically contain judgment of the characters and consequently all people who do not fit the norm. By utilizing motifs, characterization, and physical actions, Shaffer and Camus take the judgment of their characters and apply it to everyone in society who feels they are outside looking in on all the normal people. Even though they clash with each other in the methods of deploying these techniques, Shaffer and Camus’ texts both bear the same message. These two postmodernist authors use their works as a tool to criticize and condemn society’s way of destroying the abnormal, the passionate, and the crazy.
Love is a powerful emotion, capable of turning reasonable people into fools. Out of love, ridiculous emotions arise, like jealousy and desperation. Love can shield us from the truth, narrowing a perspective to solely what the lover wants to see. Though beautiful and inspiring when requited, a love unreturned can be devastating and maddening. In his play, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, William Shakespeare comically explores the flaws and suffering of lovers. Four young Athenians: Demetrius, Lysander, Hermia, and Helena, are confronted by love’s challenge, one that becomes increasingly difficult with the interference of the fairy world. Through specific word choice and word order, a struggle between lovers is revealed throughout the play. In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare uses descriptive diction to emphasize the impact love has on reality and one’s own rationality, and how society’s desperate pursuit to find love can turn even strong individuals into fools.
Meursault is very much like someone autistic. Autism is a developmental disorder which affects a person’s communication skills, social restrictions and behavior. Like people with autism, Meursault doesn’t know when to show emotions nor think they are important. You can see this pattern in Meursault when he is informed about his mother’s passing. It does not seem to affect him at all and shows this by saying “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (Camus 3).
The relationship shared by Pierre and Helene is best described as a lustful charade. It is no coincidence that Pierre, one of the most introspective characters in the novel, first marries a shallow, inwardly-ugly adulterer. His first recorded attitude towards Helene is one of admira...
Meursault (the narrator) in The Stranger only sees and only wants to see the absolute truth in society. The readers first encounter with him...
Camus’s The Stranger takes the reader on an emotionally stunted journey through a number of normally emotional moments in life including funerals, relationships, violence trials, and facing one’s one mortality. None of these things elicit strong emotion from Camus’s protagonist, Meursault, until he explodes in anger at the presumptuous chaplain in the moments before dawn on the day of his execution. In that moment, Meursault embraces the benign indifference of the universe and on the heels of his anger, feels the first real happiness of the story.
Throughout the text, Meursault uses Marie simply as a means to an end to satisfy his own ambitions, without very much regard to her own inner feelings and aspirations. “That evening Marie came by to see me and asked me if I wanted to marry her. I said it didn’t make any difference to me and that we could if she wanted to. Then she wanted to know if I loved her. I answered the same way I had t...
Living in the means of his choices he takes control of his life and succumbs to repercussion of his actions on his own terms. Meursault is later sentenced to a death penalty since the community and legal system fear him and cannot comprehend Meursault’s actions, though neither can he. A Chaplain enters his cell and wants to say a prayer for him, but Meursault denies his offer for he believes in no God : “ As if that blind rage had washed me clean, rid me of hope; for the first time, in that night alive with signs and stars, I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world. Finding it so much like myself [...] so like a brother, really [...] I felt that I had been happy and that I was happy again. For everything to be consummated, for me to feel less alone, I had only to wish that there be a large crowd of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate.” (Camus,110).Meursault is a monolith for the idea of
Meursault’s lawyer asked if he had felt sadness during the day of the funeral, to which Meursault responded, “I probably did love Maman, but that didn’t mean anything.” The lawyer then made Meursault promise to not utter a word of this during the trial as it would only hurt him. Meursault displays complete apathy in this scene and many others. It is very similar to how Millay feels about life. It is one thing over and over, life is a cycle that will never end. Meursault understands that death is inevitable and at one point everyone’s existence in the world will disappear. He does not value his life or anyone else’s. Meursault runs into further hiccups when he refuses to turn to God for forgiveness as advised by the magistrate. The magistrate goes as far as calling Meursault, “Monsieur
Meursault is distant from set plans, ambitions, desires, love, and emotions in general. He has a difficult time with emotions such as regret and compassion. The reader sees the nature of his personality in the first few lines of the novel: "Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know." When he hears of the death of his mother through a telegram, he is unattached, and can be considered uncaring.