Ishmael's Transformation To Violent Perpetrator Analysis

571 Words2 Pages

All in present tense

Thesis: No, he was not responsible for his transformation to a violent perpetrator.

Topic: Lieutenent would hurt him if he didnt do xyz
Quote from lieutenanta saying he would kill Ish if he didnt join soldier
Evidence: Most people would choose to join the army over being killed.
Becoming a soldier was the major step to becoming a violent perpetrator
Quote from lieutenent forcing Ish to do something
Evidence:
Conclusion: The Lieutenent would force Ish into doing things, which contributed to Ish becoming a violent PERPETRATOR

Topic: He wanted revenge on the rebels, which is a viable trait to have after you see someone burn your family.
Quote from when Ish was fighting with someone after family died
Evidence: When someone you love dies, the
















Before encountering the war, ten year old Ish was told of unimaginable, exaggeratedm and unrealistic stories about the war








Ishmael is not responsible for his transformation to a violent perpetrator because the combination of drugs, a manipulative lieutenant, and the feeling of revenge is responsible for Ishmael’s transformation. …show more content…

This decision is the exact same decision that Ishmael faced with the lieutenant. When the lieutenant congregates the village, he says that any man who decides against joining the army would not get food (Beah 106). Also, he says that if anyone who would run away would get shot by the rebels (Beah 106). By saying this, the Lieutenant infers that if any male who does not join the military would die. So, the lieutenant is at fault for Ishmael joining the military. Joining the military is the first step to becoming a violent perpetrator. So, partially the lieutenant is at fault for Ish becoming a violent

Open Document