Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of heroism essay
Literary analysis on pride
The nature of heroism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine a single drop of water. All humans need water to survive, yet if a person possess too little water they will surely perish. Possessing too much water however, leads to calamities like floods. Pride itself is much like water; too much of it is an obnoxious behavior yet too little is detrimental to one’s self-esteem. Nowadays, modern-day society views pride as something dreadful yet America as a whole needs to realize justified pride in the right amount is an exemplary trait to have. Modern-day media depicts pride as a sinful trait yet it is also a heroic trait to possess. Pride gives heroes the ability to stick to a moral code and be uncompromising in their ideals. An example of a character who utilizes justified, pride as a tool to …show more content…
perpetuate the idea of a strict moral code is the character Cyrano from Edmond Rostand’s play Cyrano de Bergerac. A real life example of a person who exemplifies justified pride being a valiant quality to possess is Chiune Sugihara, a Japanese man forced to choose between his honorable family pride and the orders from his superiors. Chiune’s pride caused him to make what Zeno Franco and Philip Zimbardo’s article “The Banality of Heroism” describes it as a gallant choice. In contrast to these two characters, Sophocles’ character Oedipus demonstrates how unwarranted pride is an abominable characteristic.
The contrast between the article “Banality of Heroism” written by Franco and Zimbardo, and Cyrano de Bergerac by Rostand with Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, elucidates the fact that justified pride is a laudable trait. The discrepancies between Cyrano de Bergerac and “The Banality of Heroism” when compared to “Oedipus the King” explicates the idea of legitimate pride being a noble and praiseworthy trait.
In “Oedipus the King” the protagonist Oedipus proves to be a flawed character because of his excessive pride. Oedipus grew up as a prince and was always prideful in a sense Oedipus never earned his pride but was born it illustrating the issue with unjustified pride. Oedipus is a tragic hero because his tales ends with tragedy with his wife killing herself and himself stabbing his eyes out, as well as his flawed character stemming from his excessive pride. In this sense, his pride created his problems thus proving unjustified pride is a horrible monstrosity. Nothing is wrong with pride but rather where the pride stems from is the issue. Oedipus’ excessive pride was his major personality fault because it originated from being born into royalty. If Oedipus’ pride had occurred from something less superficial, for example being, a good person, then he would have never had gotten an unhappy ending. He would of never had killed his father, the former king of Thebes, married his own mother and then later found out all of his own mistakes thus ruining his and his family’s life. A character that contrasts greatly Oedipus yet still proves that justified pride is wonderful is Rostand’s Cyrano. Cyrano is a prideful character yet he has pride for all the right reasons. Cyrano loves the fact that he
is an honorable man, especially because it makes him a hero. Cyrano’s pride allows him to be heroic verifying pride to be a valorous trait. While Oedipus’ pride caused him to be a flawed character, which led to his own demise, Cyrano’s pride compelled Cyrano to partake in the role of a hero. The main difference in their pride is whether the pride was justified. Pride is not a bad thing if it comes from a justified source much like Cyrano whose pride, originating from his honor, allowed him to take the role of a hero. A real life of example of someone who personifies the notion of being an ethical characteristic is Sugihara from Franko and Zimbardo’s “The Banality of Heroism”. Sugihara took personal pride from his family heritage. Sugihara by taking deep pride in his samurai ancestry was able to find the will to help save Jews going against his commanders orders. Cyrano took pride in his honor, Sugihara took pride in his honorable ancestry while Oedipus took pride in something that did not make him a better person, his biology.
Pride frequently has terrible results. For example, as a result of Brothers pride, he left Doodle in the storm. Brother did this because he is angry that Doodle failed, and that his dream of having an “ordinary brother” is over. Doodle realizes that he failed his brother, and feels useless. In addition, after being left in the downpour, Doodle dies. At the point when Brother discovers Doodle dead, he thinks it’s his fault that Doodle dies because he pushed him too hard. After this happens, their family feels like they should’ve been more protective and love Doodle more. In conclusion, while pride can have devastating effects, it can also result in fulfillment.
Every generation has its own heroes that display, what they believe to be, ideal characteristics. While each is different in their own way, many of these role models share similar qualities. Most tend to have courage, strength, compassion, or another respected trait, but this is not necessarily why they win the adoration of their followers.
Benjamin Franklin once said, “Idleness and pride tax with a heavier hand than Kings and Governments.” The same can be said about the pride of the major characters in the epic story “The Saga of the Volsungs” (translated by Jesse L. Byock). Every prominent figure, from Sigi, to the last sons of Gudrun, suffers from his/her own pride. Pride causes a rippling effect that leads to jealousy, betrayal, and revenge throughout the epic. A hero’s own excessive pride leads to his own jealousy if challenged, or leads to the jealousy of others who do not have as much wealth and power.
The definition of pride is a feeling or deep pleasure of satisfaction that people obtain from their own accomplishments. Odysseus, the main character in The Odyssey, is full of pride throughout his long journey. Odysseus is a warrior from the ten year Trojan War and he is trying to get back home to Ithaca. He is one of the most popular war heros from his time. On his journey home over sea, the sea god and Odysseus’s enemy Poseidon, creates obstacles for Odysseus that he has to overcome if he wants to get home. Odysseus eventually returns home after another ten years. In the epic poem, The Odyssey, Homer represents pride Odysseus’ biggest flaw throughout his encounter with Polyphemus and the Phaeacians.
“Cyrano de Bergerac” is a play about a man named Cyrano de Bergerac, a poet and a superb swordsman who contains a terribly giant nose. He’s in love with his cousin, Roxanne. Cyrano never tells Roxanne how he feels concerning her therefore she has no idea of his love for her. Within the play Cyrano is a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a great, noble, heroic character. The dictionary.com definition of a tragic hero states, “All tragic heroes have a tragic flaw and since of that flaw the hero is destined for a downfall, suffering, or defeat: the tragic hero is the character that the majority readers will sympathize or empathize with.” Cyrano is different from the contemporary anti-hero however his death was foreshadowed by his actions. Cyrano has all of these traits. Heroic principles and values are necessary of a tragic hero. Whether its showing honor in battle, by charging at enemy lines to redeem his fallen friend Christian, or his loyalty to Roxanne by visiting her each week and comforting her at the church until his death, displays why he was the hero. Cyrano's admirable traits may be seen as the cause of his downfall. His low self-esteem is why he's too afraid to inform Roxanne how he feels about her. He’s terrified of rejection. Not only is He to proud to ever except defeat in battle by never backing down from a fight but also he is too proud to tell Roxanne how he feels for he believes he will be defeated. This is often the reason why he has gained such a large amount of enemies throughout his life. His pride, along with his low self-esteem, is a burden that weighs him down throughout the play.
The erroneous idea that pride is only a predominant characteristic of crime, rather than a crime itself, would put tragic hero Oedipus on the same level as serial killer Charles Manson: while both are guilty of committing heinous acts, Oedipus relinquishes his pride and, ironically suffering under his own proclamation of exile, does penance for his crimes, whereas Manson shows no remorse for his vile and disturbing bloodletting. Oedipus' ultimate repentance is proof that he realizes his hubris and understands his mistakes, as irreparable as they may be.
Along the same line as humility comes pride. Odysseus had more pride and cockiness than any of the characters I have read about this semester. He didn’t seem as bad in the Iliad, but the Odyssey really showed him in a different light. He had to swallow his pride when he had to come back to his home and get it back. Just in the fact that he came back at all was pride swallowing. He lost all of his men.
The hero stands as an archetype of who we should be and who we wish to be. However, the hero has inherent flaws which we do not wish to strive towards. In literature, these flaws are not used as examples of what we should be but rather as examples of what not to be. This is especially dominant in the Greek hero. While the Greek hero follows his fate, making serious mistakes and having a fairly simple life, the Anglo-Saxon "super" hero tries, and may succeed, to change his fate, while dealing with a fairly complex life. The Greek hero is strong and mighty while his wit and intelligence are highly valued. In the Greek tragedy, the hero struggles to avoid many flaws. Among these flaws are ambition, foolishness, stubbornness, and hubris-the excessive component of pride. He must overcome his predestined fate-a task which is impossible. From the beginning of the tale, it is already clear that the hero will ultimately fail with the only way out being death. In Oedipus, the hero is already confronted with a load of information about his family and gouges his eyes out. At this point, when he tries to outwit his fate he has already lost and is sentenced to death.
Aristoteles’s “Theory of Tragedy” suggests that the tragic flaw in Sophocles’ play Oedipus is the King’s “self-destructive actions taken in blindness,” but a worse flaw if his arrogance. There are a few opposing views that stray from Oedipus being fully arrogant. First is that he took actions to save himself further pain. Second by putting himself in charge was the right thing to do as the leader of his people. Third Oedipus never tried to outwit the gods but used the prophecy as a warning to leave Corinth. All three opposing arguments shows a different side of Oedipus other than that of arrogance.
Being prideful can be very easy. It's natural to think that you are superior, and that you can do everything. However, this is not always correct, and sometimes pride can lead to negative effects. These instances are shown vividly through the short stories, “To Build a Fire,” and “The Scarlet Ibis.” In the end of these stories, the main character’s pride caused regret, or even death. In”To Build a Fire,” by Jack London and “The Scarlet Ibis,” by James Hurst, the authors both conveyed the common theme that pride can have negative consequences.
When it comes to pride, when do we know that we have too much? A perfect example of having too much pride lies in the Greek tragedy, Antigone. In my opinion, it is the perfect example because the main character, Creon, is dealing with all the things that are happening because of Antigone’s decision to go against his law and many people are telling him that he is wrong, but he is too confident in his own choice that nothing bad will happen.
Oedipus's pride leads to the story's tragic ending. He is too proud to consider the words of the prophet Teiresias, choosing, instead to rely on his own investing powers. Teiresias warns him not to pry into these matters, but pride in his intelligence leads Oedipus to continue his search. Oedipus thinks he can change fate. He just tries to ignore it, because he counts on his own ability to root out the truth. Oedipus is a clever man, but he is blind to the truth and refuses to believe Teiresias's warnings. He suffers because of his hamartia. I t is this excessive pride fuels his own destruction. I would just say Oedipus is a tragic hero.
The second example of when Oedipus is shown having a great deal of pride is when he goes against Creon. Oedipus calls Creon a traitor. He says that Creon persuaded him to send for the prophet, Tiresias, to find out who murdered King Laius. He thinks that Creon and Tiresias plotted against him, saying that he was the one who murdered the king. Oedipus believes that Creon did this so he could become king.
Greek politician and playwright, Sophocles, in his play, Oedipus the King, depicts a series of chronological events of the consequences of Oedipus’ downfall caused by his excessive pride. Sophocles’ purpose is to instruct readers that too much pride can dismally lead to unfortunate events. Sophocles illustrates an effective tone in order to inform the readers of the negative outcomes of stubbornness and denial.
Pride is not a bad attribute to have, it is actually very important. One definition for pride is: A sense of one's own proper dignity or value; self-respect. Self respect is a very good quality to have, however, there’s such thing as too much of a good thing. This is especially the case if you are a hero in a Greek play that has too much pride. Pride is the most central flaw in Greek tragedy, even in heroes. In the plays “Antigone” and “The Odyssey”, Antigone’s and Odysseus’ pride causes them unnecessary problems that could have been easily avoided if they had just kept their pride in check.