Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The
Being completely naked strips us of more than our fabricated materials – our choice of clothes, shoes, shits, colors, styles, material, etc., are a part of our identity; who we are is defined by our choice of packaging. In a sense, clothing can provide an artificial identity. Depending on the event I might attend, my choice of clothing can profoundly affect my behavior, attitude, and mood. A two-piece suit gives me a level of confidence and security that I do not experience in cut-off shorts and a t-shirt. What if, however, I chose to attend a social event in the nude? Am I committing a deviant behavior or is social nudity a natural state without the need for a textile identity?
Introduction
Depending on whom you talk to, nude recreation and nudism can be described as a great way to get in touch with nature and improve one’s self-esteem or it may be described as immoral and illegal. Such extreme opinions make this an interesting topic and worth further investigation. Is the desire to socialize with other people naked sexually driven or a healthy and safe means of socialization and stress relief?
Henry David Thoreau said “It is an interesting question how far men would retain their relative rank if they were divested of their clothes” (Brainy Quote, 2011). Indeed, according to the modern nudist or naturalist, being unclothed in social groups induces an environment in which everyone is on equal grounds. Can inequality really be dissolved between various socio-economic groups, sexes, ages, incomes, etc., and be broken down simply by everyone disrobing and playing naked ping pong? According to the American Association of Nude Recreation and other nudists, the answer is yes (AANR, 2011).
Can clothing be a sign of oppression and d...
... middle of paper ...
...and bashfulness of being naked in front of other people. In return, they get to socialize with other “like-minded” people who are convinced that being naked is not only normal and natural, it’s an excellent way to relieve stress and relax au natural.
Works Cited
American Association for Nude Recreation. (2011). Retrieved September 1, 2011 from .
Blank, Leonard. (August 1967). The Impulse to Look and to Show. The Journal of Sex Research. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 223-228.
Brainy Quotes. (2011). Henry David Thoreau. Retrieved September 1, 2011 from .
Martin, Richard. (1991). The Deceit of Dress: Utopian Visions and the Arguments against Clothing Utopian Studies. No. 4, pp. 79-84.
Oaklake Trails Naturist Park. (2011). Retrieved September 2, 2011 from (www.oaklaketrails.com/OLT/Welcome.html>.
Ellis, Kate. “Fatal Attraction, Or The Post-Modern Prometheus.” Journal of Sex Research 27.1 (1990): 111-22. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Feb. 2014. .
In this particular era, the nudity of a human was highly recognized and favored in different art pieces. In paintings, women were naked and covered certain parts of her body. Sculptures would lack the appearance of a woman, but would also show attributes of a female's body. Even though this topic was praised in earlier times, in today's society the topic of sex is looked upon in a negative manner. As time changes, I believe that the viewpoint and mindset of people are completely different from the 19th century point of view. Sex has become a dreadful topic because people are more attached to religious beliefs that doesn't put sex on the high level that it once “ sat” upon in the 19th century. If an artist decided to put some type of nudity or sexual visual ...
Truth: THANKFULLY both of my roommates shattered this myth, also. If they were naked, they kept it in the confine of their own rooms, which I was definitely okay with.
In almost all instances that I have been ‘out’, either to a party, club, braai or any other social event, women are wearing sexualising clothing. Sexualizing clothing, for the purpose of this essay, is defined as clothing that reveals or emphasizes a sexualized body part; and has characteristics associated with sexiness and/or sexually suggestive writing (Goodin et al., 2011: 1). This reminds me of my first night out. It was my twentieth birthday and my friends decided to give me my first nightclub experience. I must say I was very much experienced, because clubbing was something one only read about or watched on television. It was autumn and the weather had stared to get a little bit cold, so I decided to add another (thin) layer of clothing. When we got to the club it felt like we were Eskimos, mostly me because my friends were on the notion that ‘it gets hot in the club (with all the movement and talking) and that an additional layer was unnecessary’. What I found to be unfortunate, about the experience is how the different sexes dressed. Yes, it was ‘hot’ in the club, but a lot of young women went overboard with respects to the amount of material worn. In that regard, I argue that women’s attractiveness, according to the social standards of ‘the night life’, is determined by sexualised clothing and also on the number of sexual advances made towards them in a single night. Therefore, one
Shalit, Wendy. "The Future of Modesty." The Presence of others: Voices and Images that Call for Response. Ed. Andrea A. Lunsford, John J. Ruszkiewicz. New York: St. Martin’s 2000. 214-220.
A lot of the times what women wear is sexualized, just because a girl is dressed a certain way doesn 't mean that she wants to hook-up with someone or that she is “asking for it”. The way a girl dresses doesn 't have to have a hidden meaning behind it, maybe that 's just what she feels comfortable in. Women are expected to dress respectfully at all times while men can wear whatever they want and there would be no problem with it. Pictures that are posted on social media get different reactions depending on which gender posted it, while there are some things that should not be uploaded for everyone to see, it does not change the fact that we cannot control the reaction that is received. “The idea is that women should look nice and well put-together without turning anyone on, or reminding anyone of sex.” (Throwbridge) We can 't control what others think of when they see us, if their thoughts automatically jump to something sexual we are not to blame. If a guy is wearing shorts with no shirt doesn 't mean there is a hidden meaning behind his choice of clothing, it is in they way you interpret it. Even then, you should not act on your thoughts, just because you believe something does not mean that it is right. As a nation, we need to take the step to stop
Peacock, John. The Chronicle of Western Fashion: From Ancient times to the Present Day. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1991. Print.
It has become a negative topic to talk about, everyone started to sexualize their bodies and become more ashamed of it. As Foucault examples, “when anatomies were shown and intermingled at will, and knowing children hung about amid the laughter of adults: it was a period when bodies ‘made a display of themselves.’” Even though in the beginning of the 17th century people still talked freely about their bodies, it was not though of as bad or negative because it was not sexualized. People were free because as he explains, skin is just flesh there is nothing to hide or even sexualize. Yet, soon repression was used to silence pleasure and desires, and having sex outside of marriage or reproduce was not
Marsden, Jean I. "Modesty Unshackled: Dorothy Jordan and the Dangers of Cross-Dressing." Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture vol. 22. Ed. by Patricia B. Craddock and Carla H. Hay. East Lansing, Michigan: Colleagues Press Inc. 1992. 21-36.
In the late 18th century the Industrial Revolution occurred causing a huge shift in the ways in which clothing was produced and subsequently altering the ways in which clothing was perceived. For decades preceding industrialisation men and women of high so...
In today’s society, everyone is worried about their external appearance; both with and without clothes on. Women and men experience discomfort, anxiousness, and worry about how they appear to the opposite sex. Some men even worry how they appear in locker rooms to other men, even if they are heterosexual. Media has depicted to a lot of young adults of how women and men should appear and act sexually. Pornography has created false images of how sex should look and feel like, especially women who have perfect sized boobs, perfect sized labia’s and are skinny. Having the best sized boobs and the symmetrically sized labia’s does not determine if sex is pleasurable or not. As mentioned by Laurie Mintz in “A Letter to Young Sexually Active Heterosexual
In art there are many different reasons for having nudes in your work, however there are three main categories that come up more often. The first reason an artist might depict a nude person is to draw attention to something or some issue. For example, in 2007 the No- Anorexia billboard the Nolita brand, campaign was meant to shock people and bring to life an important issue facing the fashion world at that time. This photo, by Oliviero Toscani, shows an extremely underweight woman posing like a regular model. This advertisement does a good job at showing the real effects of anorexia and how people need to recognize this as a true problem. The next reason an artist might use a nude, is to show an understanding of the human form. There is not a greater form, than God’s greatest work. Artists are here to show the beauty in this world, be that a vase, plant, or person. The final reason an artist will use a nude is to show vulnerability. They do this because clothes and jewelry and material objects only work to create walls between people. When being nude a person has nothing to hide behind, no things, no layers, no walls. Just bare skin. In this instant one can get a feel of the true character of a person. Do they stand with c...
Therefore, in an attempt to both show the gravitas of fashion’s impact and justify its mirroring of times and therefore society, a walkthrough of fashion throughout history and its adaptation is exceedingly appropriate. To begin with, Britain’s Industrial Revolution in the 1850s to 1900s came with the introduction of sewing machines and chemical dyes. However, this movement of clothe manufacturing rendered its availability strictly to the opulent. This is a direct relation to the economical situation of the time, showing that people’s expenses were not directed towards the most up to date fashion i.e. luxury products but rather necessities indicating a slowly developing economy. As we move from the 1900s to the mid 1920s, the inception of the First World War influenced the need for more ‘practical’ garments. To illustrate, one of the greatest designers of the century Paul Poiret, designed his garments in a style known as the Directoire. His dresses were simple straight tube sheaths defining simplicity and exemplifying both the political and economic situation of the times justifying the necessity for a free moving design in clothing. Why adopt the notion of simplicity and free moving garments? Women had to leave their traditional domestic roles and become part of the working class or work force and adopt and replace many roles that were normally given to men. Furthermore, the Great Depression in the 1930s comes to play its own role in fashion history further pushing the necessity for a fashion to be translated to accustom a busier lifestyle. This created an economic gap between the rich and the poor. Therefore, fashion in the 1940s in the substantial sense portrayed the necessity for work and socioeconomic background and furthermore encased the economic situation where, as previous times in the 1900s, high-end fashion was restricted to the rich. Following a chronological timeline comes the
Laver, James. Costume and Fashion: A Concise History. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson Inc., 1985. Print
Sexual normality implies the innate amalgamation of one’s sexual drive, or libido, with a predetermined sexual goal, i.e., copulation. This ossified concept of normality produces a fragmentary view of sexual theory. Therefore, normality is not necessary or sufficient for sexuality; human sexuality is individual, not universal. An innate association of sexual drive with a specific sexual goal is incompatible with a comprehensive examination of human sexuality.