Nationalism was the strongest political force during the 19th century. During this time people of the same ethnicities came together to fight for their own causes. As a political idea, our textbook states, “Nationalism is based on the relatively modern concept that a nation is composed of people who are joined together by the bonds of common language, customs, culture, and history, and who because of those bonds should share the same government” (The Heritage of World Civilizations pg. 700). In 1835 the Italian nationalist and patriot, Giuseppe Mazzini explained his understanding of the concept in our textbook titled “Mazzini Defines Nationality” (pg.703). Although nationalism served as the stepping stone for the political consolidation of Europe and North America, it was also described to sever the liberties of other minor ethnic groups. Lord Action was a major nineteenth-century English historian and commentator on the contemporary religious and political events. In all of his writings, he was deeply concerned with the preservation of liberty. In the source, “Lord Action Condemns Nationalism” he voices to warn against the political dangers of Nationalism. (pg. 726)
Mazzini associates specific qualities of people with nationalism and relates them to divine purposes such as liberal freedom. He does this by explaining “the essential characteristics of a nationality are common ideas, common principles, and a common purpose. He begins to go even further by explaining the importance of nationalism and how it means even more than that. “Nationality also consists in the share of mankind’s labor which God assigns to people. This mission is the task which gives people its rights as a member of Mankind. This means that without nationalit...
... middle of paper ...
...an, Chinese, or Puerto Rican all came here to have a new life. People of different races and cultures also share many of the same problems when living in the same boundaries. In today’s society it does not matter what you are because one problem can usually affect people even in if it is in a different way. To get anywhere in today’s society you must work hard. We still do not live in a world with one hundred percent tolerance, but I do believe that the original definition of nationalism has changed. I do agree with Lord Action when he says that nationalism caused repression of minority populations. But I also believe that Mazzini makes a good point when he says a nation is more than just having common ideas, principle, and a purpose. “The life of a nation consists of harmonious activity that is of ALL individual abilities comprised within the association.”(pg. 703)
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
“Nationalism(n.) - loyalty or devotion to a nation, especially an attitude, feeling, or belief characterize by a sense of national consciousness” (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). Nationalism was a crucial part of America’s success during the War of 1812; nationalism was reflected in the post-war period through increased national pride, emphasis on national issues, increase in power and scope of the national government, and a growing sense of American identity (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). The first to arise which was the driving force behind American victories against the British was nationalism. This nationalism was expressed in four ways; patriotism, political, economical and cultural. American patriotism
Although some have said that "nationalism is measles of humankind", in my opinion, it is not. Nationalism has led to the growth of identities, and innovations. These reasons influence us in so many good ways that we should embrace nationalism to a great extent. Although at the same time I believe that we shouldn't embrace it to the extent of where we hurt others.
Q6. Nationalism was both known as a unifying and a disunifying force, your opinion depended on your perspective and background knowledge of the topic. Nationalism could be seen as a uniting force by bringing those together who believed in a single "nationality," or ancestors. Those who believed that nationalism was a unifying force also refused to be loyal to a king or queen, but they did remain loyal to those whom shared a common bond. Naturally, there were other who had different beliefs towards the topic. There were people who believed of nationalism as a disunifying force die to the fact that it would disrupt their wants to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
Throughout the years, humans have constructed many unique civilizations; all which follow a distinct social, economic, and political structure. Even so, there is one characteristic that prevails among these societies, the concept of nationalism. In short, nationalism refers to the feelings people have when identifying with their nation. This simple notion possesses the ability to divide or unite collective groups, and has played an important role in many historical events.
The rise of European nationalism in the 19th Century brought with it an overabundance amount of change that would definitively modify the course of history. The rise of nationalism in one country would rouse greater nationalism in another, which would in turn, motivate even greater nationalism in the first, progressively intensifying the cycle that eventually concluded in a World War. Nationalism as an ideology produced international competition which inspired absolute allegiance to an individual’s nation state. The ideology was fueled by industrial commerce and imperialistic developments which led to nation-states pursuits of outcompeting rival nations.
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
Nationalism is way of thinking both political and socially to create a community united by: history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other was short term impacts on Nationalism.
... Acton states, “Nationality does not aim either at liberty or prosperity” and that it also sets boundaries to how the population can exercise their freedom (126). Nationality did not bring about liberty and peace as Mazzini had hoped, because it increased the tension between the countries. It is evident that nationalists such as Fichte and Mazzini had the belief that foreigners were a hindrance to nationality and consequently the unification of Europe. As aforementioned, Acton was severely against the concept of nationalism.
...s about their 'imagined community' and 'imagined image' make up their identity. These differences would not exist without their narcissistic imaginations that inevitably form fictions from history. But, because of their refusal to recognize the other group's relational differences, major differences rise from their actions. Nationalism's depends on these imaginations; it uses the group's self-love to stake their claim in history, narrate it in their narcissistic discourse, and blind members from relational differences that would weaken their identity as a group.
These horrors caused by nationalism seem to be at the opposite end of the spectrum from the promising ideal of democracy. As Ghia Nodia pointed out, many analysts view nationalism as “fundamentally antidemocratic” (3). What these anti-nationalists fail to realize is that nationalism has also called force heroism and even sacrifice throughout history. Numerous people have risked their lives to restore democracy and civil rights in their nations, when they could easily have chosen comfortable exile elsewhere. Indeed, nationalism is the very basis of democratic government because it unites the citizens as “we the people”, supports the common political destiny, and nurtures trust toward the government.
Nationalism is what justifies nations. Without nationalism there is no need to distinguish between two neighboring countries, no need to establish political unions, no need for xenophobia. Nations are the product of small groups banding together to form one larger “imagined community.” Thus it disrupts a said community when an outsider moves in and attempts to assimilate: this is the issue with immigration. No longer does the nation share a common history. The nation is now defined by a citizenship rather than a sense of culture. Civic nationhood is associated with the United States, but can be increasingly seen seen in modern Europe. Civic duty is a more becoming a more prevalent form of nationalism; the US developed it as part of American
The nature and meaning of the term ‘nationalism’ has many different facets and dimensions. At times, deconstructing the different theoretical literature can become confusing and complicated process. These ambiguities arise from the different meanings scholars attribute to the term, while also the nature and meaning of nationalism is constantly being contested. To Primordialists, the *path to nationalism
Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.
He defines nation as an imagined political community – and imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign.” He conceptualizes imagined community as a population of people who identify as being part of a nation but can’t possibly all know each other. He then provides a historical analysis of nations. He lists three factors whose demise slowly paved the ground for nations and nationalism. 1) A script-language that played an important role in transnational solidarities like Christendom and the Islamic word. 2) The divinity or cosmological basis of monarchies that demanded loyalties of peopl3. 3) The conception of temporality where cosmology and history were indistinguishable. These elements slowly diminished first in Western Europe and later spread globally. He later provides a list of the basic principles that fuels nationalism. 1) Print and capitalism; it created connectivity and promotion of other than holy languages and people understood languages that they didn’t speak and thus created solidarity among large groups. 2) Impact of Reformation; the process first initiated by Luther and reinforced by print and capitalism created another medium to communicate and mobilize the masses. 3) The slow and gradual local vernacular replacing Latin and other holy and administrative languages like Arabic, which changed the gravitation of power from central empires to localities, thus leading to a new wave of local power centers and