Mrs. Diana Dogge is guilty for stealing Mr. Weimaraner’s diamonds.The diamonds were said to have been located at the center of the table, however a closer inspection of the scene proves otherwise. When the picture of the scene is reviewed, it is evident that Mrs. Dogge’s seat, seat a, is located closest to the platter of diamonds. Since the platter of diamonds is actually closer to her seat, it would be an effortless task for her to quickly swipe the diamonds and get back into the house without the others noticing. To add on, the platter of diamonds may have truly been at the center of the table and Dogge could have pulled the platter closer to her and snatched the diamonds, leaving the platter of diamonds closest to her seat. Also, when Wilbur
Unisex questioned the trio, each one of them said that they jumped out of their chairs and ran into the house, however evidence seems to contradict that statement. From the picture of the scene, you can tell that Dogge’s chair is resting upright, against the back wall, while the others’ chairs are on the ground. As a result of her chair being upright, it seems that she placed it there to seem less conspicuous. If she would have actually jumped out of her chair, it would not be leaning against the back wall, it would be lying on the ground, just like the other two chairs. After analyzing these pieces of evidence, it is fairly easy to see how simple it would be for Dogge to steal the diamonds. Diana’s location to the platter of diamonds allowed her to quickly snatch the diamonds, which gave her extra time to set her chair, to make her look less likely to be the one who actually stole the diamonds.
He stole it because he didn’t ask for it. Then Tea Cake comes back from work gambling. Tea Cake says, “You doubted me ‘bout de money. Thought Ah had done
It is imperative to understand that these heirlooms are mere representation of heirlooms designed for everyday use. It is ironic that Dee changes her name, and wants to take the dasher to show off in her home as part of her heritage when she is trying so hard to distance herself from her past. She does not understand that she is taking away an item used every day by her mother. She is convinced that Maggie does not deserve the quilt, because she would merely put it to everyday use. Mama cannot fathom the reason behind Dee’s desire to possess the quilt when it is obvious she sees it as an artifact. The relationship between Mama and Maggie is different from hers and Dee’s and is evident in the way the use of the family heirloom is viewed; while the former would care for and preserve the heirloom, the latter would only hang it as a piece of art, to be discarded when they get old or new ones are
and Mme. Loisel cooperate to find what seems to be an exact replica of the lost necklace, which they must purchase and return to Mme. Forestier. Mathilde attempts to find a replacement for the necklace to prevent Mme. Forestier from realizing the original had been lost. The couple travelled “from one jeweler to another hunting for a similar necklace” (175). They went together to look for the necklace, which proves that they are exerting mutual effort. M. Loisel uses all means necessary to pay for the necklace. He “made ruinous deals” (187) and “risked his signature” (188) in order to pay for the expensive diamond necklace. Though Mme. Loisel lost the necklace, her husband uses his savings and takes out loans to help her pay for the replacement. The couple acquires the necklace and must return it to Mme. Forestier. M. Loisel brings the necklace home, and “Mme. Loisel took the necklace back” (199) to the owner. The couple collaborates to get the necklace into the hands of its owner. Mathilde and M. Loisel work together to replace Mme. Forestier’s necklace, and she is none the
At 5:52 AM on December 26, 1996, Patsy Ramsey called 911 from her family’s Boulder, Colorado home. She frantically explained to the operator that her 6 year old daughter, JonBenét, was missing and a very bizarre, several page long ransom note demanding $118,000 was left. Patsy then attempted to hang up the phone, and walked away. Police arrived several minutes after the 911 call and began investigating what they thought was a kidnapping. They did a basic search of the house and closed off JonBenét’s bedroom to prevent any contamination, but did not seal any other room. Friends of the Ramseys came to the house soon after to support the family. 8 hours after the 911 call, and 3 hours after the ransom deadline, a detective asked John Ramsey,
Her quick thinking helped her not get in trouble when she tried to escape through the bathroom window. At the end, she got out of the house and remembered the dog food in her pocket. She then used the dog food to tame Duke and used him to help her walk. She also faced a huge problem when the cops were coming but had a five-mile radius to try to find her, so quickly she told the cops to put their siren on one at a time
Imagine coming home to find one of your parents or siblings collapsed and passed out on the bathroom floor. Wouldn’t you immediately call 911? Context In this case, Mrs. Verbermockle made the decision to call her family doctor instead of 911 and claimed he was unconscious. Most people would call 911, however Mrs. V finds her husband unconscious on the bathroom floor and calls her family doctor! She said that she had not touched him and had only placed a blanket on his body. The doctor arrives and concluded his death to be from a blunt force trauma to the back of his head. The doctor’s discovery suggests foul play and that perhaps Mrs. Verberbermockle knew about it. Although Mr. Verbermockle’s death may appear to be accidental,it is reasonable to conclude that Mrs. Verbermockle murdered her husband in cold blood because of her suspicious behavior, her false statements, and Mr. V’s violent injury.
Bonzi found a necklace while staying at a hotel that is owned by Alpha Corp, and the question, “to whom does the necklace belong?” is asked. First of all, the type of property involved, from a legal perspective is personal property, and more specifically, tangible personal property because the necklace is a physical object that can be moved and touched. In determining who the necklace belongs to, the legal decision that needs to be made in relation to Bonzi is: who has legal ownership of the necklace?
This demonstrates how she became savage-like, exceedingly desperate for food due to malnutrition. Mrs. Rowlandson stealing is something that contradicts with her religious faith. Though she goes against her religious beliefs, she thanks the Lord for the meal. The act of stealing reveals how trauma can slip into their lives in such a subtle way. In addition, she begins to eat food that would have been unpalatable to her prior to being taken captive. Throughout her time in captivity and the disturbing events that took place, her life had immensely changed.
Dee wants to take the butter churn to use as a center piece for her table. She also wants to take a quilt that Mama promised Maggie, and hang it up to display. All of these objects have a sentimental value but Dee wants to display these objects as art pieces but do not truly understand their value. The quilt has a special meaning to Mama. The quilt was put together by Mama, her mother, her grandmother and so one. There is a lot of history hand stitched into the quilt. Mama will not let Dee have that specific quilt because it is worth more than an art piece. “When I looked at her like that something hit me on the top of my head ran down to the sole of my feet.” (Walker) Although, Maggie will put the quilt through everyday use but she will add to it, and pass it down to her children, which add to the family’s legacy. Mama Prefers to let Maggie have the quilt since she truly understand the value it holds. During the dispute over the quilts, Maggie says “She can have them Mama... I can’ member Grandma Dee without the quilts” (Walker) That shows that Maggie does not want the quilts for decoration but it is a part of who she is, her
“I am glad to help solve this case,” I said. As the family walked closer to Robert`s desk, I couldn't help look at the ring on Miss Bones` finger. Catching me looking at Sally's, Robert Bones` daughters, ring, Mrs. Bones said, “Sally just recently got engaged to
Weeks later, when the jewelers received no answer to their letter Bohmer paid a visit to Madame Campan, one of the Queen’s ladies-in waiting. He told her that he had rece...
save it. When she goes to get it, it is gone but the maid later brings
the road , gives prestige to her family as the beauty of the bridal chair gives
A particularly evident section of conflict in the play is over Belle Reve and Stanley's "Napoleonic code". Blanche has told the Kowalski's that she had lost Belle Reve but without proof suspicions arrive with Stanley "well, what in the hell was it then, give away? To charity?" Stella doesn't take the fact that Blanche has no papers regarding Belle Reve as meaningful as Stanley does. Stanley from a relatively poor background compared to Stella and Blanches Belle Reve plantation and now would appreciate a slice of their assets and speaks about the Napoleonic code meaning that everything that his wife owns, or part owns is also his. After riffling through Blanches belongings for information Stanley subtlety confronts her with "it looks like you raided some stylish shops in Paris."
De Maupassant describes Mathidle as follows: Mathidle “…danced with intoxication, with passion, made drunk by pleasure, forgetting all, in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in sort of a cloud of happiness composed of all this homage, of all this admiration, of all these awakened desires, and of that sense of complete victory which is so sweet to a women’s heart” (pg 70). Once more De Maupassant reveals more of Mathidle’s character by announcing, “He threw over her shoulders the wraps which he had brought, modest wrap of common life, whose poverty contrasted with the elegance of the ball dress” (70). This description of Mathidle shows her passion for wealth and living this type of lifestyle. As she dances the night away, the night began to end. Maupassant states, “she removed the wraps which covered her shoulders…so as once more to see herself in all her glory” (pg 71). Once again, this shows how confident she feels in this “new” body. Once they leave the dance, she and her husband take a cab home. Arriving at the house, Mathidle realizes that she has lost the diamond necklace, and Mathidle becomes frantic. The husband agrees to stay out and retrace every step they made tonight with hopes of finding the necklace intact. With no luck, he returns home. De Maupassant declares, “The next day they went took the box which had contained it, and they went to the jeweler whose name was found within”