In the past, as well as in society today, there are a lot of different conflicts. Things such as racism, sexism, fairness of the legal system, and revenge seem to be in the news almost every day. One may ask; is the taking of revenge acceptable and is it worth the consequences? In the film “A Time to Kill”, Carl Lee Hailey experienced many of the conflicts mentioned previously. In his eyes, his act of revenge was justified and the consequences for his actions were worth the price. Let’s argue his situation and make our own decision as to whether the taking of revenge is acceptable. The film unfolds in rural Mississippi where Carl’s ten-year-old daughter, Tonya, had made a visit to the grocery store to purchase some items for the family. …show more content…
I am a happily married man and have two children of my own. One son and one daughter. Even though both are grown up, married, and starting families of their own, I still love them with all my heart and will do whatever is necessary to protect them. They are my life and their existence gives me reason to live. Would I have made the same decisions as Carl did given the same situation with my daughter? In the same situation, I can say that I would probably react the same way as Carl did. Just knowing that my daughter was helpless while she was being attacked would drive me to the point of doing anything to try and right the wrong that was committed. Does that make the revenge justified? Probably not legally or morally justified but as was mentioned previously, sometimes revenge can seem like a form of justice to the parties involved. There are times when revenge could appear to give closure to a person that otherwise would be in a never-ending nightmare. One major problem with revenge, is that many times it provokes more revenge, feeding on itself and becoming a vicious cycle (Don't Confuse Revenge With Justice: Five Key Differences. (n.d.). Therefore, the issues are not solved and only continue to escalate. From a religious viewpoint, revenge is wrong. The Holy Bible says in Leviticus 19:18 “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own …show more content…
One would like to believe that our legal system is perfect, but as the film displayed the system can be manipulated. Therefore, sometimes it seems to us the justice we feel is deserved, isn’t handed down. “Taking matters into one’s own hands may sometimes seem justified, but it hardly meets the more rigorous criteria for consensual, or community, justice” (Don't Confuse Revenge With Justice: Five Key Differences. (n.d.). Justice is about restoring balance. It should not be affected by emotions and it should be as objective as possible. The Holy Bible tells us in Deuteronomy 16:18-19 “You shall appoint judges and officers in all your towns that the Lord your God is giving you, according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment. You shall not pervert justice. You shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and subverts the cause of the
While revenge may feel sweet at times, in most cases it is destructive to yourself and those around you. The article “Revenge:Will You Feel Better?” makes one contemplate this, and draws the question “is revenge really worth it?” Well, in the article, Karyn Hall suggests that “Revenge can be a strong urge, but you may not feel better if you act on it.” In fact, in a study performed by Kevin Carlsmith showed that “...the students that got revenge reported feeling worse than those who didn't…” With this, one may see that revenge is pointless, and in most cases leaves you feeling worse than the people you performed it
For the meek, vengeance pleasures the soul; however, it is only temporal. Like an addictive drug, revenge soothes anger and tension by sedating the mind with ephemeral comfort. Despite the initial relief, pain ensues and conditions seem worse than before. Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the non-violence movement in India, stated once that “an eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” There is no such thing as a sweet revenge.
Many people percieve revenge to be something that falls under justice, as they are driven by emotions, while others consider getting the police involved as serving justice. Moreover, some people find revenge to be pleasing and satisfying, but to argue the point that just because something is more satisfying does not mean it is
Perhaps, attorneys sometimes feel a maximum amount of pressure to win cases because their client has paid them large sums of money and is counting on them for justice to be served. Also, the bitterness of victims who feel as though the American justice system fails them when they exercise their right to trial is an issue tons of individuals deal with. This results in the victims blaming the attorney instead of the setup American justice system when the attorney loses the case. Therefore, the movie is a positive reflection of a realistic event that people endure. The movie may not reflect any specific event, but it reflects a universal issue.
Revenge is a fairly strong emotion; it’s wanting to retaliate towards those who wronged you. Revenge is such an uncontrollable form of retaliation that it can result in a destructive outcome or be carried out successfully. Although the results may vary, revenge sums up to one thing which is pain of some sort, affecting both parties or just one. Throughout history, we see many tales of revenge and redemption. Often revenge does leave the one carrying it out feeling victorious, but this can suddenly change as the process of karma generally begins in some tales.
The purpose of revenge is to hurt someone because of how they hurt you or someone else. Someone will find the smallest things to get revenge on because of the hate in their heart, and always wants to hurt to someone. Revenge is played a major role in the play Much Ado About Nothing written by William Shakespeare. I never heard the urge to get revenge on someone, because karma will get him or her eventually.
... always justice, and there is usually more emotion involved in the revenge and thus the revenge hurts more than the original crime hurt.
The person at whom the revenge is directed may have harmed the person carrying out an act of revenge indirectly or not at all, but on some level there is a perceived personal grievance. An unaffected third party, on the other hand, can carry out Justice. In most developed countries it is considered vital that the judiciary be independent from the government, partly for this reason, which is justice also doesn't necessarily involve any act of retribution. For example, the “acquittal” of an innocent person can be considered an act of justice, but it certainly isn't reveng... ... middle of paper ... ...
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
It is the idea of revenge that sends a cool shiver down the spines of justly men when they begin to question as to why someone would stoop to such a level. But yet it is still more than an idea for revenge has been carried out in various forms along all the eras of history side-by-side of that of novels and tragedies. Even so, revenge is still a dark scheme; an evil plague of the mind per se. It is such a plague that will turn even the greatest persons of the brightest, optimistically capable of minds into lowly, as well as lonely, individuals. Thus, revenge will, and can, only end in despair and agony of the mind. Therefore, provided that all that has been said is true, revenge would appear quite unseemly to the observant onlooker. However, taking an in-depth insight into revenge you can uncover quite a compelling feature, which is best summed up into one word. Pride. Pride is the one clear motivational proprietor needed to push a protagonist into the downward spiral of personal vendetta. Without pride, revenge is no more than a mindless massacre of flesh and bone ending in the obliteration of any hope for reconciliation.
Vengeance is a dangerous temptation to fall under. People often are very easily lured into taking vengeance upon another individual. The cause of this is that some people often think to take justice into there own hands when it is not there duty. This is how people can become trapped and obsessed with taking vengeance upon someone else and how it can change a persons motives to evil ones, motives that are far from justice. To counter the poison of vengeance, people must act in forgiveness rather than hate and anger towards another. When showing forgiveness for others, you will also be shown forgiveness.
I do agree that revenge does have an effect on the story, but not as strong as conflict does. An example is the plot that follows the battle of Hamlet and Claudius. Hamlet wants revenge on Claudius, killing his father (Shakespeare, 39). Claudius wants Hamlet out of the picture in any way possible before that kid spoils his plan. That conflict, that revenge, that fight between them causes events like people dying or Hamlet gets shipped away.
Taking revenge is a bitter sweet thing. I have always thought that people should always get what they desire, whether it be a grade, a smile and hug or in some cases, revenge. When I was in high school there seemed to be someone always trying to get me in trouble, they would say things that wouldn’t be true or do things to make me look bad. The fact that I never seemed to do anything to them would make me mad and wonder what I could do to get them back. Revenge would usually come in some sort of verbal put down or I would try to physically hurt them. It always seemed when I would get the revenge right away I would feel really good but as I thought about what I did, and what they did to me I would always feel guilty or wish I would have never done anything to them in return.
People can be motivated to take revenge on others for various reasons. While these reasons may be considered as very serious or rather trivial, they are all motives for revenge. Revenge occurs when a person has been offended or angered by an individual and in result they have the desire to pay them back. People’s opinions on revenge differ from each other, some may believe it is justified and some don’t. Mahatma Ghandi believed that revenge is not the answer and he stated that “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This quote portrays the opinion that if everyone gets even then there will be no one else; if we all take an eye for an eye everyone would be blind. Revenge can be learnt through real life experiences as well as fiction and can be shown as justice or unacceptable. It becomes difficult to determine when revenge can be justified but is revenge always worth it?
Revenge was being classified as a sin in the bible, and is looked down upon in society, is still being presented by the media. The media is controlling the way in which we look at revenge, as it is constantly praised unintentionally with the amount of times it is showcased on the news and in movies, when in reality, it is probably the worse case of action.