Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Madness of hamlet
Is Hamlet Mad? “There is a fine line between genius and insanity”. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, prince Hamlet plays jump rope with this line, sometimes appearing utterly mad and yet other times carrying out an ingenious plan to avenge his father. So is Hamlet’s madness merely part of his cunning plot or is he truly out of his mind? It really depends on how one looks at the situation. Throughout the play it can be hard to believe Hamlet is truly mad because he always seems to be in control, with an overarching scheme in mind. Then again, how sane can he be if he is conversing with a ghost that is telling him to murder his uncle? At first glance it appears that Hamlet truly is mad, and Polonius even states to the king, “Your noble son is mad”. Polonius believes Hamlet went mad because of unrequited love for his daughter, and judging by the letter he wrote Ophelia it seems quite plausible. It’s also possible that the death of his father is all it took to drive him mad. Hamlet cared for his father, as is evident by his willingness to commit murder to avenge his death, and it is possible that his death broke his will and drove him mad. However; lots of the evidence of Hamlets madness seems fabricated, specifically his love for Ophelia. If he was so madly in love with Ophelia, why …show more content…
Even Polonius, who is entirely convinced of his madness, admits "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't". While Hamlet rambles like a mad man, he continuously makes clever comments and crude jokes at the listeners expense that go unnoticed. While talking to Polonius Hamlet calls him a fishmonger, and Polonius assumes he is just confusing him with a seller of fish, although “fishmonger” can also be interpreted as meaning “pimp”, making Ophelia a whore. It is subtle little hints like these that show that Hamlet is only feigning his madness. But if Hamlet is not mad, why does he act like
If Hamlet were truly mad, he would not have been able to give such a guileless and processed response.... ... middle of paper ... ... Hamlet’s feigned insanity was all part of his overall scheme to avenge his father, King Hamlet.
Moreover, Hamlet is mad or so he seems to be. By looking at Hamlet and all his actions everyone is convinced he has gone mad. His mood changes a lot throughout the play, he speaks "wild and whirling words" (I.v.127-134) when he found our about his father’s death, has violet outbursts towards his mothe...
Hamlet: Hamlet's Sanity & nbsp; & nbsp; “Great wits are sure to madness near allied, and thin partitions do. their bounds divide.” Though John Dryden's quote was not made in regard to William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it relates very well to the argument of whether or not Hamlet went insane. When a character such as Hamlet is under scrutiny, it can sometimes be difficult to determine what state he is in at. particular moments in the play.
Is Hamlet truly insane? While the play is not extremely clear on the matter and often contradicts itself, many of Hamlet’s wild ramblings and words of nonsense seem to be not the true words of a madman. Hamlet says himself that he is merely “putting on an antic disposition” (Act 1, Scene 5, Line 181). He admits very early on in the play that his insanity will be nothing more than a ruse to fool those around him. This is further proven by the fact that when he is around Horatio he shows no signs of mental illness. He speaks calmly and everything he says makes sense.
Throughout Shakespeare?s play, Hamlet, the main character, young Hamlet, is faced with the responsibility of attaining vengeance for his father?s murder. He decides to feign madness as part of his plan to gain the opportunity to kill Claudius. As the play progresses, his depiction of a madman becomes increasingly believable, and the characters around him react accordingly. However, through his inner thoughts and the apparent reasons for his actions, it is clear that he is not really mad and is simply an actor simulating insanity in order to fulfill his duty to his father.
Hamlet feigns madness so that he will be able to successfully get revenge on Claudius. In order for his plan not to be discovered, he has to fake madness in order to throw off his enemies. For his revenge plan to be a success, Hamlet will have to be perfectly sane so that he won’t sabotage his plan in anyway, and to keep himself alive long enough to carry it out. Hamlet’s plan on proving Claudius’ guilt and whether or not the ghost is his dead father shows that Hamlet is too intelligent to be mad. If Hamlet were indeed mad, he would be too dim-witted to come up with such a clever plan.
Hamlet decides to portray an act of insanity, as part of his plan to seek revenge for his father's murder. As the play progresses, the reader may start to believe Hamlet’s “insane” act, but throughout the scenes, Hamlet shows that he knows right from wrong, good from bad, and his friends from his enemies. Hamlet shows that he still has power and control over his actions. As Elliot says “Hamlet madness is less than madness and more feigned”. Hamlet portrays a mad man, in order to be free from questioning, thus allowing him to have an easier path towards revenge.
Justification of Hamlet's Sanity in Shakespeare's Hamlet Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" is about a complex protagonist, Hamlet, who faces adversity and is destined to murder the individual who killed his father. Hamlet is a character who although his actions and emotions may be one of an insane person, in the beginning of the book it is clear that Hamlet decides to fake madness in order for his plan to succeed in killing Claudius. Hamlet is sane because throughout the play he only acts crazy in front of certain people, to others he acts properly and displays proper prince like behavior who is able to cope with them without sounding crazy, and even after everything that has been going on in his life he is able to take revenge by killing his father's murderer. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet is sane but acts insane to fulfill his destiny of getting vengeance on his father's murderer. We can see this when he talks to Claudius, Polonius, Ophelia, and his mother.
(Hamlet: IV.v.51). It is clear that the corruption in the kingdom causes Ophelia to become insane. She cannot cope with or overcome her father’s unfortunate death because it was committed by her love, Hamlet. As Ophelia becomes insane due to her father’s death, she is also affected by Hamlet’s treatment of her. Ophelia wants to trust Hamlet and does not understand his antic disposition, but still tries to be loyal to him.
Hamlet is without a doubt one of the most complex pieces to interpret for many different scholars and people. The question of the truth behind his madness has become a debate among anyone who lays eyes on the play. In fact, madness becomes a large role within the play that will cause many situations as well as effect them. I believe Hamlet unintentionally went mad attempting to act as a mad man.
Only a few acts later, he murders Polonius in cold blood, and has no reaction, saying ‘I took thee for thy better’ (L.34) suggesting how he mistook Polonius for the King. In contrast Hamlet spends most of the time, thinking and not acting; it could be considered strange behaviour that he should suddenly react in this way. It can be argued that these, are not the actions of a sane person, and the question of to what extent is Hamlet’s madness is feigned. The OED defines ‘Mad’ as when ones actions are ‘uncontrolled by reason or judgement; foolish, unwise’ which can be argued to encompass Hamlets behaviour, and it might be thought that from Polonius’s murder,
Hamlet throughout the play seems insane but in reality it is only an act to achieve his goal of killing his father's murderer. Hamlet chooses to go mad so he has an advantage over his opponent and since he is the Prince of Denmark certain behavior is unacceptable, so by faking madness he is able to get away with inappropriate sayings and actions. We can see this when he talks to Claudius, Polonius, Ophelia and his mother. When Hamlet talks to Horatio in the first act he says how he is going to "feign madness" and that:
In the actual play, one of the principle argument is whether Hamlet is truly mad or not. To analyze this for validity, one would have to look at the linguistics of the play and the situations that play out within it. There is concrete evidence, as well as implied detail, which leads one to believe that Hamlet is only acting as if he were mad in order to carry out his plan to avenge the death of the late King Hamlet.
(2.2.205-208) Polonius is surprised when Hamlet does not recognize him but thinks he is a fishmonger instead. He believes Hamlet is crazy in love. Polonius says to himself, “Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t- will you walk out of the air, my Lord?” (2.2.223-224) Polonius tells himself that Hamlet talks a good talk, but many crazy people do. Many have a way with words.
By which I didn’t see it as a possible reason for Hamlet to be acting crazy, but when you take into account the things that Hamlet is going through like accepting his father's death, it’s a possibility. Additionally, when you take into account his father's death, the most reasonable person that Hamlet would consult to talk to about his problems with them is his mother. Likewise, it wouldn’t be a viable option for Hamlet to consult his mother because he himself holds a grudge with his mother for marrying his uncle in such a short time period. Likewise, as a result Hamlet really doesn’t have anyone to talk to about his problems, so as a result Hamlet doesn’t know what to do, but later on Hamlet takes everything to his own hands, which can be reflected by his change in personality which Polonius would classify as being