Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Before characterizing Lizabeth as malicious, a definition must be provided. The first online source defines malicious as “Intentionally harmful, spiteful” (dictionary.com). Another source, Collins English Dictionary, provides this similar definition: “Intended to harm people or their reputation, or cause them embarrassment and upset.” Finally, the last website notes a slightly different definition which states, “Someone who is malicious enjoys hurting or embarrassing others” (vocabulary.com). Unlike the others, the final definition provided adds that the malicious acts done are for enjoyment. All of the definitions impart two criteria are needed to prove that someone is malicious. The first criterion that must be apparent is that someone must …show more content…
commit an act which was meant cause harm without having a prior motive. Someone malicious would not be acting on revenge, they simply are spiteful and malevolent. To fulfill the second criterion, one must find causing the hurtful acts enjoyable. Their enjoyment is usually easily recognizable and obvious as it’s expressed physically. In “Marigolds,” Lizabeth is portrayed as malicious by Eugenia Collier, she does this by showing that Lizabeth repeatedly intentionally attempts to hurt Miss Lottie and adds that Lizabeth enjoys causing harm.
An instance where Lizabeth displays malice is when Miss Lottie attempts to scare away the kids tormenting her. Lizabeth recalls, “Then I lost my head entirely, mad with power of inciting such rage, and ran out of the bushes in the storm of pebbles, straighty toward Miss Lottie, chanting madly, ‘Old witch, felling a ditch, picked up a penny and thought she was rich!’” (Collier). With the given situation Lizabeth’s rhyme, “picked up a penny and thought she was rich,” was chosen with thought and deliberately shouted. Lizabeth knew what socio-economic situation Miss Lottie is and was in her whole life as an African American woman during the late seventeenth and early 18th century, so she used this against her in a harsh rhyme about Miss Lottie’s poverty ridden life. This reveals Lizabeth’s intentions: causing distress. Furthermore, Lizabeth states she “lost her head” and went “mad with power of inciting such rage,” this leads to the inference that she did not expect such a sufficient outcome. When causing harm without reason it usually fails to succeed, but the fulfillment of their attack caused to her feel powerful and in turn go mad. Lizabeth maliciously incited an incursion on Miss Lottie which often leads to impulsiveness and loss of thought, as shown in the story, which can cause a harmful
outcome.
In Henry Slesar’s classic story “The Right Kind of House”, an old widow named Mrs. Grimes puts her tattered home up for sale with an asking price far more than it’s worth. Her real estate agent assumes she needs the money, living alone and all, but in reality, Mrs. Grimes has a complex plan to locate the man who murdered her son Michael, using the family house as bait. She then hopes to due justice to her son by ending the life of his assassin. Throughout this tale, Mrs. Grimes is best described as willing and clever, as she used her unconditional love for Michael and unsuspected intelligence as motivation to find and kill his murderer, putting herself in danger to succeed.
“You think,’ she said, ‘you can buy me off with this book?’ […] ‘You and your husband. Sitting up here.’ Now she became spiteful. More spiteful and evil than she thought herself capable” (262).
Along with being arrogant and outgoing, she is also a very meddlesome person. After Miss Strangeworth ran into Miss Linda at the market, her actions afterwards demonstrate to us how she is meddlesome. To demonstrate, on page 367 it states, “Looking after her, Miss Strangeworth shook her head slightly. Martha definitely did not look well.” She’s meddlesome in the sense of her snooping around where she isn’t needed. It’s not her job to determine whether there was something wrong with Martha. Likewise, on page 366 the text states, “Mr. Lewis looked worried, she thought, and for a minute she hesitated, but then she decided that he surely could not be worried over the strawberries. He looked very tired indeed.” This quote also shows us that Miss Strangeworth continues to involve herself in other people’s business. Mr. Lewis may be worried about something larger than strawberries, but it isn’t necessary for her to find it normal to involve herself. Her character in this sequence of events is basically the definition of being meddlesome.
their side; she bears the insults of the town and particularly the apperent viciousness of
Through Ginnie Sue’s actions in the novel, she is characterized as a compassionate women. When Jeannette and her younger sister first enter the Pastor household, Ginnie Sue is polite and greets them with a smile and handshake and, “[...] she offered (them) seats at the table,” (Walls 161). Ginnie Sue continues to be polite throughout the meal and Jeannette soon finds out the similarities that her and Ginnie Sue’s family share. After the dinner Jeannette realizes that despite her job and what other people in the neighborhood may think of her, Ginnie Sue is just like anyone else. By the author having Jeannette discover that Ginnie Sue is similar to herself and others it helps to change her perspective of the family and her original judgements of her being vulgar and ill mannered. This new characterization of Ginnie being good-hearted, redefines her original “label” proving the fact that you cannot base your judgements of a person solely on what others say about
... little girl's banishment from Puritan society she was thrown to another way of life and her wildness and peculiarity is a direct product of her banishment.
She was aware of the situation of women in her times, especially being a puritan woman. They were restricted to certain modes of behavior, speech
Before overhearing the conversation, Lizabeth already has a sense of guilt as she finishes attacking Miss Lottie: “Suddenly I was ashamed, and I did not like being ashamed.” The conflict of not being either a child or an adult yet both together has been in her mind badgering her. After overhearing the conversation, she realizes that she is the oldest kid of all the kids she plays with, and she should be aware of her responsibilities for their
There are many norms associated with being a woman and being a man, especially during the time period of which Strong Poison by Dorothy Sayers was written in. These include, but are not limited to, the following (feminine and masculine counters are separated by a / ): one must always obey males because they are the superior sex/one must not allow women to hold any form of power because they are the weaker sex, one must obey her husband/one must not let his wife do whatever she pleases, and one must not live with another of the opposite sex unless they are relatives or married. Despite these norms being set in place for most of the characters in Strong Poison, there are a few exceptions for on both the feminine and masculine side.
But what the other members of her community aren't aware of is that she's actually a hateful, and nosey the instigator of many of the town's problems and concerns. She often wrote Anonymous letters to the townspeople, gossiping and criticizing about others problems. One example of this behavior is when she writes to Mrs. Crane, “Didn't you ever see an idiot child before? Some people just shouldn't have children, should they?” (Jackson 4) What she says makes people feel bad when they receive letters like this. She writes these because she thinks that she can fix the problems of others. And make “her” neighborhood a better place. She then goes on to write to Mrs. Harper, “Have you found out yet what they were all laughing about after you left the bridge club on Thursday?” (Jackson 4) This probably made Mrs. Harper worried or even upset. Maybe she's not aware of the pain she causes others, they're not even aware that it is Miss Strangeworth writing the letters. This shows the reader that one should it be read deceived by another's
And she revelled in it, before it became too dangerous. She, unblinkingly, sent countless people to their deaths; she effortlessly imposed dreadful fear upon the young girls in the village, to the extent that one was reduced to insanity. She thought not once to stop, the euphoric indulgence was too great for her, because she could, she did. Ironically throughout her diabolical reign the one redeeming feature she possessed enforced her actions and accusations most powerfully, her illusive childlike innocence.
The narrator explains that one night “I frightened two children in the woods, on purpose: I showed them my pink teeth, my hairy face, my red finger-nails, I mewed at them, and they ran away screaming” (Paragraph 25). That situation shows that people are understandably afraid of her, and she knows it. Another situation unfolds that show that even when the Narrator is trying to be friendly and not trying to frighten anybody that she still scares people. This happens when the Narrator reminisces “I detached myself from the brambles and came softly toward him (a man sleeping after having sex with a woman)… He woke up, he saw my pink teeth, my yellow eyes, he saw my black dress fluttering; he saw me running away. He saw where.” (Paragraph 36). This eventually leads to the Narrator’s death as the man then leads the mob of villagers to the Narrator’s house where they kill her.
As many of us know, our world today is not short of sarcasm. Many times sarcasm can be funny but other times it can cause harm. But in Anne Sexton’s poem, she uses sarcasm to throw her audience back to actuality, even a midst a fairytale element. In Anne Sexton’s poem, Cinderella she uses sarcasm and a basis of the true tale to make what many would call a “mockery” of the original Grimm Tale. Sexton does not refer to the Grimm brothers in her poem, for she considers this re-telling her own creation, uniquely by using irony to her advantage. As an audience we can relate to how and why Sexton takes much from the original versions, but we find that her interpretation brings a different approach. Sexton felt the original versions held no light to reality, so she changed the shallow premise of the original Cinderella bringing all the unrealistic morals in the story to the surface. The author's style, tone, and language helps to convey her sarcastic approach and differentiate between gritty reality and the ideal of fairy tale endings.
She does this by revealing Miss Strangeworth’s ironic actions of her destructive attitude and hypocritic ways. This statement shed lights when Miss Strangeworth is writing letters to Mrs. Harper and Helen, and she notices how the town is becoming more vile, “The town where she lived had to be kept clean and sweet, but people everywhere were lustful and evil and degraded, and need to be watched; the world was so large , and there was only one Strangeworth left in it,” (Jackson, pg. 253). Miss Strangeworth exemplifies arrogance and hypocrisy by stating that she is the solution to all evil, yet she is initiating evil by means of writing letters to people conveying her pernicious words and telling them that they are not good enough. She expresses how she dislikes evil, therefore she is contradicting herself with her actions since she continues to spread evil through her judgemental
In addition, another issue that Edith bought up I this play is good versus evil. In the play the fairy godmother identifies the bad fairy as the reason for miss Canada’s pride and desire for materialistic goods. In contrast to the good fairies who bought wealth, health, power to grow, beauty and etcetera to Canada. According to me I think Edith tried to highlight that, we are surrounded by both good and positive energy, and we have a choice to act on.