Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral or ethical concerns with Edward Snowden
Moral or ethical concerns with Edward Snowden
Whistleblowers: heroes or disloyal employees
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral or ethical concerns with Edward Snowden
One of the famous faces of whistleblowers is Ed Snowden. According to Stanforddaily When he was asked by Perry and Taylor whether he sees himself as a hero or a traitor, considering the various depictions presented by the government and media. ?This is a really common question that?s asked a lot,? he said. ?I think it?s got one of the least interesting answers. I don?t think about myself or how I will be perceived. It?s not about me. It?s about us. I?m not a hero. I?m not a traitor. I?m an ordinary American like anyone else in the room. I?m just trying to do the best that I can.? Victor Xu I believe whistleblowers play a vital role in our today?s society. It's not disloyalty, and whistleblowers maybe are the most ethical employee of any organization, and they sacrifice themselves for public good or interest and organizational accountability. They serve a necessary purpose, carrying information in the public interest from the Gov to the media/journalist. They are not anonymous or close(ly) political. Whistleblowers try to expose and correct corruption and wrongdoing in the system. They have a meaningful role in checking the violations of state secrecy. …show more content…
Sadly my organizations overlook efforts by whistleblowers to put attention about misconduct occurring inside the organization. The system needs more whistleblowers because those in positions of power are usually skillful at hiding corruption from the public. People with honesty and a desire for truth and justice are our biggest hope for bringing information to this
Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the extent of the N.S.A breaches of American privacy and in doing so, became ostracized by the media and barred from freely reentering America, his home country.
They risk being label as a traitor or killed if their identity ever becomes compromised. For these reasons many people will never help expose the crimes being made within the corporations. Yet, the whistleblowers who are willing to jeopardize their wellbeing do it for one of two reasons. First, form of whistleblowers believe that exposing the crime could benefit them greatly by allowing them to move up the chain of commanders or can grant them a monetary reward. The second form will come forward to revile illegal activity for ethical reasons. This type of whistleblower believe that what is being criminally done is morally wrong and therefore, they should help to stop these wrongdoings (Friedrichs, 2010, pp.
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is considered illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The information of suspected wrongdoing can be classified in many ways: violation of company policy/rules, law, regulation, or threat to public interest/national security, as well as fraud, and corruption. Those who become whistleblowers can choose to bring information or accusations to surface either internally or externally. Internally, a whistleblower can bring his/her accusations to the attention of other people within the accused organization. Whereas, externally, a whistleblower can bring accusations to light by contacting a third party
However, police whistleblower is unfortunately all too rare. In the rare cases when other cops do muster the strength to and integrity to report gross misconduct of another officer, the whistleblower is often times ostracized, intimidated, threats made to the security of their jobs, and threats to their lives. For instance, Mr. Barron Bowling was awarded $830,000 due to the life long brain damage from a beating he received from a Drug Enforcement Administration agent Timothy McCue in Kansas City, KS. Timothy McCue claimed that Mr. Bowling resisted arrest. Fortunately a police detective names Max Seifert had the strength to report the wrong doings of the DEA agent. In doing so, he said reported that Timothy McCue threatened to kill Mr. Bowling, called him White Trash, and called him a system dodging inbred hillbilly. Members of the department destroyed photos of the physical damage done to Mr Bowling. Officer Seifert took the statement of witnesses and re-documented the physical and presented it to officials. For being a whistleblower, officer Seifert was forced into early retirement, lost a sizeable part of his pension, and retirement health insurance. In addition, his name and service was slandered and
Edward Snowden is another well known whistleblower. Edward Snowden was a former CIA employee who leaked information about the NSA programs that collected information about telephone calls of Americans and e-mails of
.... Companies with whistleblower policy are view as high ethical and with string moral values that protect the ones that act and speak up when things are done illegally or for personal gain (Newsroom Indiana University, 2009).
It sometimes requires uncommon courage, as whistle-blowing in the workplace is not so easy to do. What motivates you? Is it revenge, ethics or a combination? To take a closer look, let’s consider what is whistle blowing and explore a few conditions used to justify whistle-blowing, and concluded with how companies can benefit from a whistle-blowing policy.
For drug crimes there are financial incentives for informants, yet proper incentives for whistleblowers in money laundering cases with major financial institutions don’t seem to exist. Martin Woods was the director of the Wachovia anti-money laundering unit in London when he discovered the money laundering that was occurring at his bank. He said that after he reported that information to Wachovia executives, he was treated like a “business prevention officer.” The executives ignored his pleas even though Woods’s instincts were exactly right. They also told him to back off, served Woods a discipline letter, and scheduled a hearing for professional misconduct. Woods ended up quitting his job in frustration a year later. He sued for harassment
The most glaring instance of whistleblowing is the Edward Snowden case. This instance can be classified as an “individual vs. government” type of accusation. In recent years, this type of whistleblowing has seen very little success. Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning, the...
Wrongdoings happen all around the world. Whether on a small or large scale, immoral practices such as abuse of power, cheating, money laundering, etc. are common in almost all of the countries. Whenever these cases happen, many people are bribed into concealing the secret and do so as they are told. This act causes that particular practice to grow and do even more damage to society while still being unknown to the innocent public. Although, there is almost always a person involved who is against the practice and wants to reveal what’s happening to world. Unfortunately, those who speak out, also known as whistleblowers, end up facing harsh consequences. What did these people do wrong? The point being, Whistleblowers should be protected because they uncover secrets that affect the public, expose unethical practices and help make the future better.
My feelings on a person being a whistleblower tend to be mixed. One of the things that can either make or destroy the career that a person has is on how well the issue of being a whistle blower is handled. In the event that the employee becomes a whistleblower and the management does not provide support to the employee, then the employee is viewed as one who cannot be trusted and also may end up losing his or her job. On the other hand, being a whistleblower may save the business not only money but also their reputation. One of the former organizations I worked for, there are different measures that have been put forth to ensure that employees are able to become whistleblowers in the event that they have to. The first thing is to first ensure
Almost all whistle-blowers face some form of retaliation if they are not protected by unions or professional organizations. Both the professional and personal lives of the whistle-blower will be questioned and if possible, damaged. Form a career standpoint, the whistle-blower might be fired, given bad recommendation letters and even blacklisted from future employments in the same position of other organizations. The social life of the whistle-blower and everyone close to them are ripped apart by rumours that might be true or false but, nonetheless still be very. Sexuality, mental stability, drug abuse and sex scandals are the few ways that the personal life of a whistle-blower can be damaged.
According to Merriam-Webster, the legal definition of Whistleblower is: an employee who brings wrongdoing by an employer or other employees to the attention of a government or law enforcement agency and who is commonly vested by statute with rights and remedies for retaliation. In some cases, whistle blowing against the government can be seen as an act of treason; and in other cases, the whistle-blower is rewarded for coming forward with the information they possess. In this essay, I will describe two examples of whistle blowing to exploring the distinction between these outcomes.
O’Connell describes how whistle-blowers have protected themselves by hiding their tracks or not leaving signs. Additionally, she shared how one person is not enough. Thus, informants must find a trustworthy confidant to revel information to. Using these techniques will better able a whistle-blower to safely reveal information and make a difference (Kehoe 2014).
Once a whistle-blower has disclosed to an external party, the public and media scrutiny, as well as possible resulting charges may result in long-term harm to the reputation of an organisation (Figg 2000). A tremendous amount of time may be spent fighting whistle-blower divulges, which could result in a possible loss of confidence toward employees remaining within the firm and the emergence of any mutual suspicion among employees can badly affect their performance, which may also made the firm suffer a loss of profit along with a decline in the market effectuation. Weinstein (1979 cited Keenan 1995, p.4) notes that more often than not, managers have taken the stance that whistle-blowers pose a risk to the organisation's unification, authority structure, and public