Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of irrigation on Yuma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of irrigation on Yuma
How has irrigation affected Yuma? Well, irrigation has completely changed Yuma. The reason why is because before irrigation Yuma was a complete nothing. No one really knew what Yuma was before irrigation. No one wanted to live here. Yuma’s crops were dry because there really was not crops growing.
Irrigation affected farmers. The reason why is because farmers were losing money because their crops were not growing due to lack of water. Now that we have irrigation farmers can irrigate their fields. About 100 years ago, an underground passageway was built to help irrigate the fields and is still used today. Irrigation has changed Yuma because it has affected different people. The most important people affected was the farmers. The reason is
…show more content…
For one the river helps because that is easy access to water. Without Yuma being where it is now we would not have as much crops as we do now. What really started the geography of Yuma was the gold rush of 1849. The U.S. Army was able to send supplies down to Mexico. So having the river right there was very helpful to both farmers and the military.
If Yuma did not have the river next to it we would have to find a different source of water. The Colorado River is very useful for the farmers. About 80 percent of Colorado River water goes to agriculture. Having the river was helpful for the Yuma population. More farmers wanted to move here just because of the Colorado River right here and that was good for farming.
The Colorado River, before Yuma was built, ran wild. The Colorado River met up with the Gila River in the table-flat floodplains. When irrigation was first created people used gates to control the water flow to the fields. But, before they used the gates a dam had to be built in order to control how much water is flowing. After the dam was built the farmers would open the gates to the fields and let water run in, after the amount of water was needed the people would close the gates and the river kept flowing. This made farmer’s lives
…show more content…
The reason why is because their land would finally be irrigated and they could start making some money to get more crops. So farmers had a little bit of happiness with the Yuma Project. But, the farmers also had to worry about over flooding. The reason why is because if their fields got over flooded then the crops would drown and die which meant money lost for the farmer. Some farmers were nervous about the Yuma Project because they were nervous about how it would affect their crops and fields. So it was a 50/50 on the Yuma Project. After the Yuma Project farmers had to pay $10 an acre-foot. Which back then was a lot of money for a farmer to pay for an acre foot.
The Indians were affected by the Yuma Project. This is because they lost a lot of land. Most of the land was occupied by the Quechan Indians. Time was running out for the Indians. The Indians had to give up a lot of land so that the Yuma Project could get constructed and put into function. The Indians did not really have a say if they wanted to give up land or not. So they packed up their stuff and moved down to some new land. This was hard on them because this meant that they had to start all over again and make new huts and
The primary purpose of Friend dam is to help regulate the flow of San Joaquin into available uses of its environmental, wildlife, and farmer’s impacts. The dam controls the flow of water delivery where it needs authorization first before the schedule can release any delivery waters into canals, steam, and wild life habitats. There will be agreements and many protocols to do with it first to avoid unnecessary spilling. There are 5 release schedules which include quantity of water available, time water, flood control requirements, release schedules from storage reservoir above Millerton Lake, and water user requirements. These benefits of flood control, storage management, modification into Madera and Friant-Kern Canals, to stop salty water from abolishing thousands of lands in Sacramento and throughout San Joaquin Delta, as well as deliver masses of water into agricultural lands in 5other counties in the San Joaquin Valley.
Up until the early 1900’s, the Salt River flowed without any control or restraints. However, it was a burden for travelers on the trail leading from Prescott to Tucson. In 1911 the Roosevelt Dam was built upstream from Tempe and the flow was reduced until in the late 1930’s when the river ceased to flow altogether. Many people have often wondered what it would be like if the riverbed would once again be filled with water.
In December 1936 the United States Department of the Interior authorized the Lower Colorado River Authority to construct a low dam at the site of an old crossing on the river known as Marshall Ford. Marshall Ford Dam was completed in 1941 through the collaboration of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) of Texas. The original purpose of the dam was to prevent floods from devastating Austin, TX. The capital city had substandard heavy damage from previous floods since its establishment in 1846. Soon bureaucrats came together to create the Colorado River Project, wanting to create a series of dams along the Colorado River to create hydroelectric power and serve to control floods and droughts. With Buchanan dam well under way with a total of six planned Marshall Ford was the only dam designed primarily for flood control and the only dam in which USBR oversaw construction. With money scarce there was debate over the final height dam and it reservoir capacity. This issue resolves itself with the flood of 1938. Once completed Marshall Ford Dam would flood 65 miles of the Colorado to form Lake Travis, creating the largest of the seven reservoirs known as the Highland Lakes.
The one feature common to the Hoover Dam, The Mississippi river and the three gorges dam is that they all tried to control nature’s swings, specifically in the form of flooding. Before the Hoover dam was built, the Colorado river “used to flood spectacularly…but after 1900 the Colorado provoked a vehement response” (Pg 177). The response was simple, but large. The U.S. built several large dams, including the Hoover dam, on the Colorado to decrease its flooding and increase power and irrigation. Unfortunately, just as human control of the Colorado’s flooding increased, its organisms and habitats were detrimentally influenced, and the water became more and more salinated.
The negative aspects of Glen Canyon Dam greatly exceed the positive aspects. The dam’s hydroelectric power supply is only three percent of the total power used by the six states that are served by the facility. There is a surplus of power on the Colorado Plateau and with more and more power-plants being created in the western hemisphere, Glen Canyon Dam’s power is not needed (Living Rivers: What about the hydroelectric loss). Although the ‘lake’ contains twenty seven million acre feet of water, one and a half million acre feet of water are lost yearly due to evaporation and seepage into the sandstone banks surrounding the ‘lake’ (Living Rivers: What about the water supply?). The loss of that much “water represents millions, even billions of dollars” (Farmer 183). If the government were to employ more water efficient irrigation practices, as much as five million acre feet of water per year could be saved.
On the other hand, Mayan irrigation system was less complex compared to Moche’s, because they had extremely rocky landscape that prevented Mayans from constructing complex structures of the system. Even though Mayans still had their irrigation system, they rather developed their own ways of saving or finding water from nature, such as water caves.
The Midwestern United States has experienced flooding for a long time now, but recently the annual precipitation has been far greater than before. Precipitation has increased 37 percent since 1958 (Jeff Spross). However a few major floods have been recorded dating back to 1913. In 1913 torrential rainfall hit Indiana and Ohio. The ground was greatly damaged from the flood causing difficult agricultural years for many years after the flood. Another flood hit a large portion of the Midwest region including the eastern Dakotas, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Indiana in 1993. Recovery costs for the Great Flood exceeded $4.2 billion. Like the flood in 1913 agriculture was affected for many years hurting the economy of the Midwest. A more recent disastrous flood hit mainly Iowa in 2008. After the flood in 2008 agriculture again took a hard hit and since the government ...
In the 1830's the Plains Indians were sent to the Great American Deserts in the west because the white men did not think they deserved the land. Afterwards, they were able to live peacefully, and to follow their traditions and customs, but when the white men found out the land they were on was still good for agricultural, or even for railroad land they took it back. Thus, the white man movement westward quickly began. This prospect to expand westward caused the government to become thoroughly involved in the lives of the Plains Indians. These intrusions by the white men had caused spoilage of the Plains Indians buffalo hunting styles, damaged their social and cultural lives, and hurt their overall lives.
...e Americans, resulting in a large depletion of land. As this benefited the people that had migrated throughout the United States, it really harmed the Native American population.
Some of the direct effects of the droughts were that many of the farmers’ crops were damaged by deficient rainfall, high temperatures, and high winds, as well as insect infestations and dust storms that accompanied these conditions. What essentially happened was that the soil lacked the stronger root system of grass as an anchor, so the winds easily picked up the loose topsoil and swirled it into dense dust clouds, called “black blizzards.” The constant dry weather caused crops to fail, leaving the plowed fields exposed to wind erosion. The effects of the drought happened so rapidly and progressively over time that there was very little preparation and planning the farmers could do before having to abandon their homes.
When the crops were plentiful, the harvest would bring money and food and supplies for the next year's crop. Rain had an enormous impact on the farmers. Too much or too little could be devastating to their crops or the food supply of farm animals, and they affected the farmers who were dependent them....
Carbon emissions from the steamboats polluted the air (Roark, 261). The building of roads was a major connecting point for states. There were some arguments about who would pay for these new roads.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Yuma’s irrigation has caused many things to happen in Yuma County. There was several events that happened due to the irrigation that caused Yuma to grow more and more. Therefore Yuma’s irrigation changed a lot, the developers had challenges they had to face, different groups in Yuma had to face the Yuma Project changing things, and also technology changed Yuma in many ways. In this essay, you will learn about the events and why some of these events were important to Yuma Counties irrigation system.
2. The water-flow had to be harnessed to provide much needed water to the fertile, yet arid agricultural areas of California and Arizona.
...around we would have to cover our mouths with our hands or go inside. As I read the research on the pesticides used in the Yaqui Valley, these imagines quickly came back. I learned that the greater good outweighed the risk of a few. The cost of the Green Revolution through the greed of the farmers and government officials outweighed the wellness of the children in the valley. I think if it had not been for the research of Dr. Guillette, the children of the valley and for generations to follow would have suffered from developmental and cognitive delays due to the use of pesticides. The Green Revolution was an act to save millions and which it did but not without a high cost of sacrifices of the children of Yaqui Valley. In the end, changes were made and the use of pesticides were regulated which in turn saved an astonishing number of lives.