Iran Hostage Crisis Research Paper

283 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Iran hostage crisis

The Iran hostage crisis was when 66 American hostages were taken from the U.S. embassy in Iran because of the Iranian people being angry at the U.S. for their relationship between the leaders. In the 1950s, the U.S. made Shah the Iranians new leader and took out their old one. The people did not like him, and how the U.S. was using him, and how their relationships were too close with the U.S. president. After the shah moved out of Iran because he was scared for his life, since it was no longer safe for him to be in Iran, since he was threatened too many times by his own people. The shah then fled from place to place looking for somewhere to hide safely, and asked if he could stay in the U.S., and Jimmy carter said yes, which made the Iranians

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Taken Hostage By David Farber

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    This completely changed the perception of the United States within Iran. Many Iranians believed that “American influence and power made a mockery of their national autonomy and desecrated their religious beliefs” (Farber, 37). The real struggle came once the Shah sought asylum in the U.S. Iran believed this to be a betrayal and demanded the Shah be released to the revolutionaries. Due to the fact that the United States did not refuse the Shah, the revolutionaries took the embassy in Tehran and all of the people that worked there hostage. One of the hostages wrote back to his parents during the crisis “‘We will not be set free until shah is released and the longer we stay here like this the better is a chance for something terrible to happen’” (Farber, 156). The siege was led by Iranian students who supported the revolution and the Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader that the revolution had selected to take the place of the

    Read More

  • Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq by Stephen Kinzer

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kinzer tells us that the Iranians celebrated their nationalism in taking control of their oil, but their success was a shock to the British multinational companies in Iran. They did not like the idea of Iran nationalization, so they plan a coup to overthrow the Prime Minister Mossadegh. But this plan failed and the British were disarmed and sent back to their country closing down their embassy in Iran. The British tried to present their case to the United State in a way that the United State would intervene. So they presented a case that Mossaghe is not only nationalizing the Iranians oil, he is also leading Iran into communism. This case stirred the American action and they feared if they assassinate Mossaghe, his seat will be open and communist ...

    Read More

  • The Causes Of The Iran-Contra Affair

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    For decades, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East had depended on a friendly government in Iran. The newly appointed leader, the shah of Iran, began Westernizing the country and taking away power from the Ayatollah, powerful religious leaders. The United States poured millions of dollars into Iran’s economy and the shah’s armed forces, overlooking the rampant corruption in government and well-organized opposition. By early 1979, the Ayatollah had murdered the Shah and taken back power of the government. A group of students who took the American embassy hostage on November 4th, 1979, turned the embassy over to the religious leaders. Carter knew he must take action in order to regain the American embassy and the hostages, but with all of the military cutbacks, the rescue attempt was a complete failure and embarrassment. It took the United States 444 days to rescue the hostages. This was the final straw for many Americans, and enough to push them to the “right” side of the political spectrum, Republican.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy: The Iran-Contra Affair

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Between the years of 1983 and 1986, the United States was involved in a series of covert operations, collectively known as the Iran-Contra Affair. These operations were at best controversial, and at worst blatantly illegal.The Iran-Contra Affair (or the Iran Contra-Scandal) revolved around the issue of foreign policy, specifically with regards to Iran and Nicaragua. In 1979, revolution in Iran resulted in a complete change in the countries relationship with the United States. Having previously been an ally of the U.S., Iran, under its new regime, had become decidedly anti-American. These changes caused a time period of unrest that lasted into the mid 1980’s between the U.S. and Iran. Stabilizing the situation in Iran was one of the key objectives that motivated many of the authorities who were ultimately responsible for the Iran-Contra Affair. In 1985, seven hostages were taken by a terrorist group in Lebanon. This terrorist group had ties with Iran. Therefore, when Iran requested that the United States sell arms to them, President Reagan saw it as a potential way of getting the hostages returned. President Reagan wanted to see them returned safely, and hoped to restore good relations between the U.S. and Iran in the process. Many members of Congress were strongly against the idea. To go through with the arms deal was in direct violation of several laws, including policies against selling arms to entities on lists of terrorists countries, or terrorist-friendly countries, (Iran was included on such lists). Additionally, in negotiating with Iran, the Reagan administration would be dealing with known “terrorists,” something Reagan was openly very against. Nevertheless, the Reagan administration granted the Iranian’s request, in spit...

    Read More

  • Iran-Contra Affair

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Iran-Contra Affair involved the United States, Iran, and Lebanon. The affair coincided with the Iranian hostage crisis, which promoted the United States’ actions in sending weapons to Iran. The Reagan administration decided to trade arms for hostages in hopes of successfully retrieving American hostages from Iran. Iran was at the time under the power of Ayatollah Khomeini, who had put his full support behind the hostage crisis and believed there was nothing that the United States could do to Iran. America’s only chance of rescuing the hostages was to put their support behind Iran in the Iran-Iraq War, which involved the shipment of weapons to Iran f...

    Read More

  • Jimmy Carter

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...w the United States’ close ally Shah. Countless modernizers were persecuted, arrested and executed. In November 52 United States diplomats were held hostage by student revolutionaries who’d seized the American embassy in Tehran. America took immediate action and seized all Iranian assets. The United States attempted to negotiate. The negotiation, to the dismay of the American people dragged on for 444 days. There was a large push for President Carter to use military forces as means of negotiations; he however opted for peaceful means, which proved to be unsuccessful. Finally in April 1980 the President sanctioned a rescue mission. The attempt failed due to technical difficulties, eight men died; as a result the nation became extremely unnerved. Carter's dialogue with Iran continued throughout 1980. This was yet another failure on Carter’s part to rectify an issue.

    Read More

  • The Blowback of Operation Ajax

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    One main cause of the Hostage crisis is the U.S. dependency on foreign oil. The need for foreign oil has led leaders to make poor decisions in the past. The CIA intervention in Iran in the 50’s is a great example of this. The Government led and funded a revolution to get a ruler that favored the U.S. more than the Prime Minister favored western nations (Kinzer, 11). The U.S. and Britain felt that if they overthrew the government, they could get more access to oil and therefore, move on to other nations with oil having gained oil in one country.

    Read More

  • The Iran-contra Affair

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    Iran-contra affair is the name of a major United States foreign policy scandal in the 1980's. It involved two secret operations by the executive branch of the government. The operations were (1) the sale of military equipment to Iran, an enemy of the United States; and (2) the provision of military aid to contra rebels in Nicaragua, which Congress had banned. The two operations were connected by the use of profits from the Iranian arms sales to aid the rebels. Background.

    Read More

  • The Iranian Oil Revolution: The 1953 Iranian Coup D État

    1433 Words  | 3 Pages

    The 1953 Iranian coup d’état was the CIA’s first successful overthrow of a foreign government. It was seen as an action to stop a possible Iranian communist takeover led by Mohamed Mossadeq, the Iranian prime minister at the time. But in actuality, the U.S. and Britain were more afraid of the imposing Soviet threat in the region. Because Britain and other western countries issued sanctions on Iran as a consequence to oil nationalization, the Britain and the U.S. feared that Mossadeq would turn to the Soviet Union in an effort to stabilize Iran’s economy. Fearing that Iran would soon be influenced by communism, the U.S. looked at the option of regime change as an answer to the ongoing crisis. In 1953, under the Eisenhower administration, a CIA coup to overthrow Mossadeq was authorized. After three days of CIA organized riots in Iran, Mossadeq surrendered, Fazlollah Zahedi, as chosen by the CIA, succeeded Mossadeq as prime minster of Iran. Now that Mossadeq, once a leader of the democratic movement in Iran, was no longer a political force, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi came back to power, now with little political opposition and supported by the United States and Britain. The CIA coup was originally intended as a solution for the Iranian oil crisis, but its occurrence later caused undesirable results in future. Although the real reason for the CIA overthrow of the Iranian government was to protect geopolitical interests from the Soviet threat in the region, the United States, did not foresee the negative, long term effects of coup, some of which are still evident today.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Did the Activities in Iran Prove Detrimental To Foreign Policy in the Reagan Administration?

    1734 Words  | 4 Pages

    Beginning with the Iran Hostage Crisis in 1979, in the midst of Jimmy Carter’s second term, our relationship with Iran has been anything but healthy. Iran, at the time of the crisis, was under the radical influence of Ayatollah Khomeini. He had overrun and exiled the previous Shah who the United States had better relations with. After learning of the Shah’s fight with cancer, influential Americans convinced President Carter to permit the Shah to travel to the country to receive prominent medical care. This did not go over well in Iran and Khomeini then called for the students working at the U.S. embassy in Tehran to act on behalf of the country in response. On November 4, these “Iranian extremists” captured fifty-two American hostages.1 Carter attempted negotiations ranging from diplomacy to helicopter invasions, but nothing was accomplished. The relationship between the two countries...

    Read More

  • The Causes And Effects Of The Iranian Hostage Crisis

    1323 Words  | 3 Pages

    November 4th, 1979 was a normal day for many people across the globe, however in Tehran, Iran a 444 day long journey had just begun for 60 plus Americans. Today, this issue is better known as the Iranian Hostage Crisis. This plight started with the United States' attempt to westernize Iran. Which resulted in severe backlash from Iran against the United States citizens. This quickly became a crisis for the United States and a scurry to try and save American lives.

    Read More

  • The Iran Hostage Crisis

    2450 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Iran Hostage Crisis was a very important event that impacted America in many ways and destroyed our relationship with Iran. The consequences of this event are still felt today and continue to our foreign policies toward Iran. Throughout the 20th century, the United States tried to control Iran to ensure the exportation of oil to America. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi came to power in 1941 and became allies with the United States. However, in the 1950s, Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh began to gain political power.

    Read More

  • Cold War Dbq

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    He saw threats of the Soviet intervention in Central America and the Middle East, and he aimed to contain them. While many American citizens supported his conservative coalitions about anti-Communist stance, others opposed to the president’s policy and mobilized to protest. Referencing Document 28.1, “Iran Hostage Diary,” 1979-1980 Robert Ode, in November 1979, Iran students stormed the U.S Embassy in Tehran and held fifty –two Americans hostage for 44 days. This goes to show the bearing of the Cold War. Their demand included the surrender of the deposed shad, which was the U.S. for medical care. As frightening as the hostage was for the American citizen’s massive buildup was and despite the constitution of peace protests, Ronald Regan won reelection in 1984 by a landslide. Referencing Document 28.8, “Speech on Iran –Contra” Ronald Regan went on television and spoke about the Iran Contra scandal. Although he Regan appeared on television during the commissions hearings, this was the first time he spoke directly to the American people about the scandal. This was how Regan addressed the problems during the server time of

    Read More

  • Our Man In Tehran Sparknotes

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Iranian Islamic Revolution took place during 1979. The people of Iran under the influence of Ayatollah Khomeini came together to enforce Islamic laws in Iran and dethrone the Shah. Many countries participated in the revolution including Canada and America. America created a bad reputation for themselves when they favoured the Shah, whom Iran was against. This encouraged several Iranian students to oppose America by holding the people in their embassy hostage**(rephrase). Out of those hostages, six had managed to escape from Iran by the help of a Canadian ambassador who risked his life in taking them in. Ken Taylor, the Canadian ambassador, was a hero to America due to his courageous effort to rescue several Americans from the U.S embassy

    Read More

  • Causes Of The Iran-Iraq War

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    Iran lost the support of the US in 1979 after the hostage crisis in Tehran, Iran. In Tehran, “66 members of the US embassy staff were taken hostage by Khomeini’s supporters” (Steele 12). The hostages were held for 444 days (Steele 12). The aftermath of the crisis was the international isolation of Iran. The US being a superpower, drove similar responses in its allies. Iran had lost a majority of their allies, which would hurt them during the war. In addition to the loss of the support of the Western countries, the Arab countries were also against Iran and supporting Iraq. The Arab countries also shared Iraq’s trepidations about the Iranian rhetoric of “exporting Islamic Revolution” (Karsh). As reported by graduate Mr. Jacek, Iran was left to defend itself economically and militarily. The other superpower at the time, the Soviet Union, had a positive relationship with Iran in the beginning. The Soviet Union had been supporting Iran in the beginning of the war. The Soviet Union then carried out an invasion of Afghanistan, and Tehran opposed the Soviet role in the invasion of Afghanistan. Iran’s relations with the Soviet Union became problematic, which negatively affected Iran (Karsh). The war with Iraq slowed down Iran’s research. Near the end of the Iran – Iraq War, Iran started working with a rogue nation, North Korea. The countries partnered up to work

    Read More

More about Iran Hostage Crisis Research Paper

Open Document