Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
First nations people of canada
First nations people of canada
First nations people of canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jason
Scott Sutton
CHC2DI
Tuesday, June 19th, 2018
Aboriginal Land Claims
The First Nations People have had their land taken thus needing them to try and get it back after the government wouldn’t give it back. Even though these land claims caused the death of an aboriginal protester first nations land claims had a positive impact on Canada because the First Nations groups involved got their land back, compensation in money, and the respect and dignity they deserve. One example of these claims was the Ipperwash crisis. The Ipperwash crisis took place in 1995 and was in and around the Ipperwash Provincial Park in Ontario. In 1936 the Ontario government created the Ipperwash Provincial Park. In 1942 the government wanted the land back to build
…show more content…
a military training camp. When the First Nations people refused the government took the land under the War Measures Act. The government gave the Stony Point First Nation group $50 000 in compensation and relocated them to the Kettle Point Reserve that was nearby. Although the First Nation group was promised that the land would only temporarily be a military camp, the reserve still remained a camp until the 1990s.
In May of 1993 a group of Stony Point First Nation members peacefully occupied part of Camp Ipperwash (the military camp) in order to assert their land claim and start negotiations with the federal government. In 1994 the government stated that they would be closing the military camp and that they would be returning the land. This however, didn’t happen. When military personnel and equipment still occupied the land after the government promised to return the land, in the 29th of June in 1995 Stony Point First Nation members forced their way into the military camp’s administrative buildings, prompting the military to withdraw completely. The OPP (Ontario Provincial Police) deployed officers into the area including Ipperwash Provincial Park, because the Stony Point First Nations group was planning to occupy that as well. On Monday, 4 September 1995, Stony Point First Nation members entered the park. Their reasons for the occupying the Provincial Park was their frustration with the federal government’s refusal to return Stoney Point Reserve, belief that the park was part of the reserve, and concern that burial grounds were not protected and respected. The intent of the …show more content…
OPP was to “peacefully manage the occupation of Ipperwash Provincial Park”. Unfortunately the use of helicopters and boats for surveillance purposes heightened tensions. On the 5th of September there were reports of protesters firing guns and the authorized use rifles by the OPP helped contribute to the anxiety and tension to the First Nations group and the OPP. Thanks to a misunderstanding and miscommunication both the First Nations group and the OPP both believed that the “other side” was planning an attack on the 6th of September in 1995. The OPP received reports of weapons in the park which lead them to believe the aboriginal protesters were violent. The police, carrying weapons and wearing protective gear advanced towards the protesters in an attempt to force them back to the park. The weapons and protective gear caused the Aboriginal protesters to become anxious and angry. This contributed to raising the already high tension and confusion. A protester advanced towards the police officers and the police ran towards him. Aboriginal protesters ran to support one of their group members and there was a physical confrontation. Sergeant Ken Deane shot Anthony O’Brian “Dudley” George (An aboriginal protester) and killed him. Deane later claimed that George pulled a weapon on him. Sergeant Deane was convicted of criminal negligence causing death on the 28th of April 1997. He died in a car accident before he could testify in court. In September 2015, the Chippewas people of Kettle Point and Stony Point First Nation accepted a $95 million from the federal government that included return of the land and $20 million in compensation to First Nations people and $70 million for future development of the land. In the end this group got what they asked for after over 73 years of them being told they would get it back. This land claim is a good example of how these land claims had a positive impact on Canada. At first the government refused to return the land to the First Nations people which caused them to be rightfully upset.
But in the end after confrontations the First Nations people got their land returned. “One of the key recommendations that resulted from the inquiry was for the Ontario provincial government to relinquish control of Ipperwash Provincial Park to the Kettle and Stony Point First Nations.” This is a quote from the website Indigenous Foundations. This quote is talking about after the discussions of what the natives should get as compensation that it was decided that they would also get control of the Ipperwash National Park as well. The federal government gave up control of the park and the First Nations people currently maintain it but, it is currently co-managed by the province. From the CBC article “20 years after Ipperwash crisis, First Nation accepts $95M offer” it talks about how the First Nation members accepted the offer of a $95 financial settlement which includes the cleanup of Stony Point land and the return of the land taken in 1942. “Band members will receive $5,000 each, with community elders receiving $10,000 each. Descendants of people who lived on the land before it was expropriated will receive $150,000 each”. This quote from the CBC
talks about how much money each individual First Nation member will receive. Finally, a quote from the Canadian Encyclopedia, “ongoing training and education of OPP leaders in terms of Aboriginal history, customs, and rights”. This is a quote that is one of the recommendations made to make sure a land claim like this one never happens again and results in the death of an aboriginal. This quote shows that aboriginal people are making progress to be respected and keep their dignity. In conclusion this is proof that the aboriginal land claims are a positive impact on Canada. Works Cited Marshall, T. "Ipperwash Crisis." 14 Aug. 2013, www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/ipperwash-crisis/ "20 Years After Ipperwash Crisis, First Nation Accepts $95M Federal Settlement News." CBC, 20 Sept. 2015, www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/ipperwash-1.3233013. "Ipperwash Crisis." Welcome to Indigenous Foundations, indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/ipperwash_crisis/.
The journey for the Aboriginals to receive the right to keep and negotiate land claims with the Canadian government was long but prosperous. Before the 1970's the federal government chose not to preform their responsibilities involving Aboriginal issues, this created an extremely inefficient way for the Aboriginals to deal with their land right problems. The land claims created by the Canadian government benefited the aboriginals as shown through the Calder Case, the creation of the Office of Native Claims and the policy of Outstanding Business.
To begin Sprague argues that the Canadian Government disingenuously mismanaged Metis land organization. Sprague states that evidence of this can be seen in the Canadian government not allowing the Lieutenant Governor Adams G. Archibald to make changes to Section 31 and 32 of the Manitoba Act. Archibald proposed the government grant outlined in Section 31 should allocate each person of Aboriginal ancestry an allotment of “140 acres” (pg.75) of land. Archibald also suggested that the location of these allotments be in close proximity so as to “not disperse families throughout the province” (Pg. 75). Lastly Archibald proposed a suggestion in carrying out Section 32 which insured that land owned was not jeopardized during the process of confederacy. He recommended that Manitoba be recognized as an independent province such that affairs including land ownership would be dealt with on a provincial level. Therefore as Sprague argues Archibald’s words were not taken into consideration by both the governments of John A. Macdonald and Alexa...
This paper supports Thomas Flanagan's argument against Native sovereignty in Canada; through an evaluation of the meanings of sovereignty it is clear that Native sovereignty can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty. Flanagan outlines two main interpretations of sovereignty. Through an analysis of these ideas it is clear that Native Sovereignty in Canada can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty.
Razack (20020 defines the historical legacy of the “white settler society” that has dominated the legal and historical rights to land usage in relation to indigenous peoples and people of color. In addition to this problem, Razack (2002) also defines the problem of “mapping” that has allowed a primarily racist Canadian government to marginalize or remove people of color from land ownership and placement in the white hegemonic community. In response tot this, Razack (2002) proposes an “unmapping” method in which the underlying racism of Canadian legal policies can be exposed and reconstructed to resolve the problem of racism in land usage in Canada. These are the important aspects of racial identity and spatial organization that define the conflicts of racism in Canadian law and in the “unmapping” of the “white settler society” that Razack (2002) identifies throughout the
To start off, I’ll be writing about the life of people in British North America and its significance towards unifying Canada, as well as background knowledge of conflicts that existed. Life in British North America was changing at an alarming rate. New technology and services were being introduced such as railways and steamships. Industries such as building, producing and farming were being introduced. This was in part due to the many immigrants from Britain and France who’d settled. This was dreadful for the First Nations as their land had been taken away even more so than before. More resources were needed for the growing crowd so trade agreements were made. As more people came, the First Nations were even more distanced from the Europeans. Meanwhile, the French and the British wanted the other’s culture to be erased from the
The land of the Native Indians had been encroached upon by American settlers. By the
Vancouver currently maintains an image as a sort of maternal ethnic melting pot, a region rich in cultural diversity and with a municipality that is both tolerant and welcoming of various displays and traditions. However, upon closer examination of recent history, it becomes clear that the concept of the city embracing minorities with a warm liberal hug is both incorrect and a form of manipulation in itself. The articles Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver and The Idea of Chinatown unravel the cultural sanitization that occurred in Vancouver at the turn of the nineteenth century as means of state domination. Through careful synthesis of primary documents, the articles piece together the systematic oppression suffered by BC indigenous
Steckley, J., & Cummins, B. D. (2008). Full circle: Canada's First Nations (2nd ed.). Toronto:
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
Living in Canada, there is a long past with the Indigenous people. The relationship between the white and First Nations community is one that is damaged because of our shameful actions in the 1800’s. Unnecessary measures were taken when the Canadian government planned to assimilate the Aboriginal people. Through the Indian Act and Residential schools the government attempted to take away their culture and “kill the Indian in the child.” The Indian Act allowed the government to take control over the people, the residential schools took away their culture and tore apart their families, and now we are left with not only a broken relationship between the First Nations people but they are trying to put back together their lives while still living with a harsh reality of their past.
Systems: The canadian Future in light of the American Past.” Ontario native Council on Justice. Toronto, Ontario.
trial of two men for the 1971 murder of Helen Betty Osborne in The Pas Manitoba.
“In about half of the Dominion, the aboriginal rights of Indians have arguably been extinguished by treaty” (Sanders, 13). The traditions and culture of Aboriginals are vanishing at a quick pace, and along it is their wealth. If the Canadian Government restore Native rights over resource development once again, Aboriginals would be able to gain back wealth and help with the poverty in their societies. “An influential lobby group with close ties to the federal Conservatives is recommending that Ottawa ditch the Indian Act and give First Nations more control over their land in order to end aboriginal poverty once and for all” (End First). This recommendation would increase the income within Native communities, helping them jump out of
Many Native groups, because they were nomadic, didn't see land as belonging to one person. The idea that someone could come in, claim a piece of land and ban them from it, caused many problems.
The Indian Act was an attempt by the Canadian government to assimilate the aboriginals into the Canadian society through means such as Enfranchisement, the creation of elective band councils, the banning of aboriginals seeking legal help, and through the process of providing the Superintendent General of the Indian Affairs extreme control over the aboriginals, such as allowing the Superintendent to decide who receives certain benefits, during the earlier stages of the Canadian-Indigenous' political interaction. The failure of the Indian Act though only led to more confusion regarding the interaction of Canada and the aboriginals, giving birth to the failed White Paper and the unconstitutional Bill C-31, and the conflict still is left unresolved until this day.