The story of Alexander Supertramp A.K.A. Chris Mccandless (novelized in Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer) is one of a boy who, not content with his societal position, journeys across the country (from Georgia to Alaska) in search of a great adventure. Along the way, Chris meets a plethora of people in all walks of life. The novelization of him is written in such a way to promote freeing oneself of the shackles of society and running off in search of adventure. The Christopher Mccandles of the novel can be associated with an article, written by Arthur Miller, titled “Tragedy and the Common Man”. In the article, Miller outlines 4 major qualifications required to be considered a tragic hero. Although Chris may fit all of Miller’s qualifications …show more content…
to make him a tragic hero, he is disqualified from it because he quite simply is not a hero; this displays a fundamental flaw in Miller’s definition of the tragic hero. Chris Mccandless evidently fits the Arthur Miller qualifications of a tragic hero throughout his journey.
The first major qualification that Miller outlines is that the primary struggle of a tragic hero must be his or her search for their deserved place in society. In the story of Chris, this is painful evident near beginning of the movie, when he is sitting with his parents in the diner. His parents offer him material things countless times, with him refusing every time. Through his shifty posture, the audience perceives the level of discomfort he feels being in that situation. Though the audience later sees that this moment was not the primary motivator for Chris, it was a catalyzing event that tipped him over the edge. The shot itself shows that Chris’ “rightful place” (or where he perceived it), was not with his family. So he adventured off in search of it. With this, Krakauer also exemplifies the second qualification of Miller’s: a tragedy should question the status quo. The entire journey of Chris is evident of this trait in him. Particularly strong symbolism to this effect was evident in the scene where Chris abandons his car and burns money. Paper money is a symbol of modern society in America because it is the prime directive of most in their daily lives. From thinking about it, to making it, to spending it, money makes the world go around; thus by burning it, Chris rejects the very notion of its importance (as fire is final and entirely destructive). The third …show more content…
qualification that Miller outlines is that, in tragedy, a hero must have a conceivable possibility of succeeding. For Chris, his survival trait is his intelligence. Early on, the movie shows him graduating from Emory University and later, the truck driver is quoted saying that Chris was evidently not stupid. And because of his education, the reader has an easier time envisioning his survival. Krakauer adds to this facade by showing Chris’s love of literature. Which leads to the final qualification that Miller has: the tragic flaw. For Chris, his flaw was the persistent belief that in the end, no matter what happened, he would be fine. In his journal, Chris writes (about himself); “Two years he walks the earth. No phone, no pool, no pets, no cigarettes. Ultimate freedom. An extremist. An aesthetic voyager whose home is the road” (Krakauer 163). This passage is evidence of romanticization of Chris’ life in his own head. It is no secret that Chris is engrossed with literature as the entirety of the book is littered with quotes from him and moments where he stops to just read. Aside from talking about himself in the third person, he relates his trek to those of fictitious adventurers before him. In great adventure novels, the reader is struck by a sense of wonder upon the hero’s return home, and Chris believed his story would garner similar awe. In the end, the road becomes his final resting place. He refuses to receive help (like he believes a hero should) and being alone leads to his final actions and a secluded death. Despite matching with all of these qualifications, Miller forgets one major point that ultimately disqualifies Chris from being a tragic hero.
Chris is not a tragic hero quite simply because he is not a hero at all. Immediately preceding any other part of the story, Krakauer shows Chris displaying an unheroic trait through Gallien the truck driver. When “Gallien offered to drive Alex all the way to Anchorage, buy him some decent gear, and then drive him back,” Chris rejects his offer claiming he will “be fine with what [he’s] got” (Krakauer 6). Chris does not value the support of others, a decidedly unheroic trait. Heroes are not only brave in the face of adversary, but can also acknowledge gifts and experiences. Because not only is Chris refusing a gift, but also the experience Gallien brings to the instance. And a true hero respects the guidance of others. Chris, however, often displays a lack of regard for anybody that is not himself. Chris meets Ron Franz, an old man whose wife and son died in a car accident, in the California desert. And in the movie, it becomes evident that Ron’s attachment to Chris helps keep Ron motivated to move on with life. Ron even asks to adopt Chris in the hopes that Chris will not leave him alone, again. As Chris is leaving him, Ron even breaks down in tears that Chris coldly ignores claiming that Ron would be fine alone. Chris refuses to postpone his vague goals of travelling to Alaska, even for an old man who was nothing but good to him. A
true hero is willing to sacrifice their wants for the needs of others, but Chris never once does anything for anyone but himself. His selfishness is unrivaled as he ruthlessly travels around doing and taking what he wants without a second thought as to whom it affects. He does not even care about his own family, who raised him, nurtured him, loved him his whole life. When talking to his father, his mother says, “How is it [...] that a kid with so much compassion could cause his parents so much pain” (Krakauer 103-104). It lends quandary to him as a hero to see so many people, so frequently talk about the pain he left in his wake. The compassion Chris exhibits throughout are only ever to further his own goals and never to help another. Though his home life was flawed, his parents did whatever they could to make him happy. His sign of appreciation for it was only abandonment. People so quickly grant the title of hero to a character for the sole purpose of identifying them as the main character, but the title carries so much more weight. At the end of the day, a hero has to be a character that the reader feels comfortable identifying with and looking up to. A hero is a title of selfless and Chris, at every opportunity, shows he is the opposite. Chris Mccandless was just a kid who died young because of his own arrogance and blase attitude towards any other person. His lonely death was poetic justice for the all people he shunned in his brief stint as Alexander Supertramp.
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
Have you ever felt like you didn’t belong somewhere and just wanted to get away? Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is about a guy named Christopher who called himself Alex, and he just wanted to get away from his life and live how he wanted. Christopher McCandless stands out because he shows his emotions thoroughly and goes through with what he thinks. McCandless can be described as a thrill seeker, arrogant, and courageous.
In 1992, Christopher McCandless set off on an odyssey into the backcountry of Alaska, an adventure that had proved fatal. After McCandless's corpse was found, Jon Krakauer wrote an article on the story of Chris McCandless, which was released in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. The article had received a negative response; several readers criticized McCandless for being foolish and ill-prepared, and showed no sympathy or remorse for his death. McCandless has been referred to as a nut, a kook, and a fool. However, McCandless was not a nonsensical man. In 1996, Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, was published. The novel uncovers more detail of McCandless's story. Into the Wild rebuts the idea of McCandless being someone who is foolish, and speaks of the many occasions where McCandless has demonstrated great perseverance and determination. The novel also proves the intelligence of McCandless, and brings insight into McCandless's psyche. The following examples will illustrate how McCandless was not a fool, but someone to admire.
“Don’t judge a book by it’s cover, it’s what’s inside counts” This quote reminds people about how they should not judge other people from the outside but look deep into their true personalities. Looking from the appearance and how Chris lives, everyone would assume that Chris is a crazy, foolish person and does everything without thinking. If people try to know more about Chris, they would have different perspective. Chris is intelligent, determined, independent and follows what he believes. He went into the wilderness to escape from the society that tries to suppress him and look for the meaning of life.
According to others, Chris McCandless was inherently selfish. Please, let’s beg to differ, for goodness sake, he was a grown man! It was his life and he was living it the way he wanted to. Chris gave his sister fair warning. He bid to her, “Since they won’t ever take me seriously, for a few months after graduation I’m going to let them think they are right, I’m going to let them think that I’m “coming around to see their sides of things” and that our relationship is stabilizing. And then, once the time is right, with one abrupt, swift action I’m going to completely knock them out of my life...” (Krakauer 64) He knew what he had to do. He had to show his parents how they had made him feel his whole life. As a graduation present they offered him a new car, his old Datsun apparently was to their standards. Chris became infuriated. That was his pride and joy, how dare them try and take that away! They ignored what he was saying, as he did many times before, he o...
The author skillfully uses literary techniques to convey his purpose of giving life to a man on an extraordinary path that led to his eventual demise and truthfully telling the somber story of Christopher McCandless. Krakauer enhances the story by using irony to establish Chris’s unique personality. The author also uses Characterization the give details about Chris’s lifestyle and his choices that affect his journey. Another literary element Krakauer uses is theme. The many themes in the story attract a diverse audience. Krakauer’s telling is world famous for being the truest, and most heart-felt account of Christopher McCandless’s life. The use of literary techniques including irony, characterization and theme help convey the authors purpose and enhance Into The Wild.
... every aspect of his life whether it be his education, physical endurance, or making it through the Alaskan wilderness with nothing more than a rifle, a backpack, and a road map. Chris was aware of his differences and that he did not fit into society. He fully embraced that and and chose to lead his own path. Chris led a happy life according to one of his last journal entries he wrote, “I have had a happy life and thank the lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!” (Krakauer 199). Chris was willing to risk everything to gain that happiness. His ambition to enter the wilderness, in the end, took his life but that did not stop him. He would have rather died a happy man than lived a miserable one. Chris ventured out into the wilderness and found himself; a tragic story for a tragic hero.
Christopher McCandless’ stubborn personality causes him to leave a loving home in order to start a new beginning as “ Alexander Supertramp, master of his own destiny”(Krakauer 23). He refuses to further educate himself with a law degree, instead taking a journey into the wild, leaving behind his mother, father and caring sister. Chris grew up as an intelligent individual excelling in almost everything he did. His parents supported him and often encouraged him in his endeavors. Unfortunately, and for clear reasons, Chris did not reciprocate his parents’ love, instead he creates an illusion of normality, causing his parents to believe that everything was fine, while he slowly drifted away from them both physically and emotionally. Chris “let them think they were right”, so they would begin to think that he was beginning to see “their side of things”, when in truth, he was merely waiting for the right time to completely “ knock them out of [h...
...opher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise. Chris possesses monumental ambitions that had the potential to be harvested into something great, but were not taken advantage of in the correct way. Through the book Krakauer paints a chilling picture of how detrimental choices can be. Had Chris been better prepared for his trip there is a good chance he would have walked out alive. Had Chris lived, he would not be famous, merely criticized for his poor choices and selfish behavior that deeply impacted those close to him. Chris is not a hero, nor should he be regarded as one. His actions were admired by others but spontaneous naive actions do not constitute a hero.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
He went through many obstacles that could have proved fatal. From canoeing in the Colorado River to picking the right berries, he was testing his intelligence. Chris had a true confidence in the land and in himself to set out on a mission so dangerous. “Wilderness appealed to those bored or disgusted with man and his works. It not only offered an escape from society but also was an ideal stage for the Romantic individual to exercise the cult that he frequently made of his own soul. The solitude and total freedom of the wilderness created a perfect setting for either melancholy or exaltation” (Nash; Krakauer 157). Chris longed to escape from society and rely on only mother nature. An innumerable amount of people desire to withdraw from society as Chris did; but they are so comfortable and secure with a normal life they do not dare take such a gutsy
Into the wild is a non-fiction book which expanded from the nine-thousand-word article by Jon Krakauer. This article ran in the January 1993 issue of the magazine Outside. Jon Krakauer was very much drawn toward the tale of McCandless and decided to write his story. He spent more than a year tracking down the details of the boy’s tramp. Then he used matter-of-fact tones to narrate what he chased on the path about the boy. The framework presented in this book can be separated into three parts: (1) retracing, including the interview with most of the important people who once kept company with Chris; (2) wildness, presenting mails generated from readers and several idealists that were in the similar situation with Chris; (3) affection, including the memory of parents, sister and friends.
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
Throughout the novel, Krakauer formulates strategies in his writing through the employment of logos, the appeal to reason. He utilizes this to allow the reader to learn about Chris’s personality throughout his life. “Nuance, strategy, and anything beyond the rudimentaries of technique were wasted on Chris. The only way he cared to tackle a challenge was head-on, right now, applying the full brunt of his extraordinary energy” (111). Chris was a person who would do things first, ask questions later in a sense. His compulsive behavior is accounted for when he decided to take on the adventure to Alaska. Moreover, it also led up to possible parallels between Krakauer himself and Chris within the second half of the novel. “When I decided to go to
McCandless is a very independent person, a person with high hopes, that has a lot of courage, and is a very brave man for going out by himself in the wild of Alaska of the Stampede Trail. Chris McCandless had a lot of courage on going to Alaska by himself at a young age. While Chris was at any city or anybody’s house, he was ready to go to Alaska. But while he was there, close to the end of his life, he left a note on the back of the bus saying, “S.O.S I need your help. I am injured, near death, and too weak to hike out of here i am all alone, this is no joke. In the name of god, please remain to save me. I am out collecting berries close by and shall return by evening. Thank you, Chris McCandless. August?” Chris McCandless was by himself at the time. He shows his courage because while by himself, he went back out even though he was near death. He went out for food. Food for his health. That shows how much courage he had for his trip. Chris McCandless encouraged many young men to ...