Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intimate partner violence
Intimate partner violence
Intimate partner violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Define
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) refers to assaulting and coercive behaviors adults use against their intimate partners. Holden (2003) describes IPV childhood exposure as: (1) prenatal violence, (2) a child’s intervening in violence in an effort to stop it, (3) being directly victimized during violence against mother, (4) participating in the assault on the mother, (5) being an eyewitness to violence, (6) overhearing violence, (7) observing the initial effects of violence, (8) experiencing the aftermath of violence, and (9) learning about a violent event. For the purposes of this paper both permanent caregivers and parents are considered and used interchangeably. Studies show that children are present during 75% of IPV occurrences.
Integration
…show more content…
The cycle of violence that IPV families often experience goes through 3 phases: tension building, violence, and honeymoon (Jacobs 2014). During the tension building phase family members in the household stay out of the perpetrators way, try to control the environment to avoid an escalation in violence, deny past abuse, excuse perpetrators behavior “He’s really stressed at work” and begin to withdraw because of the tremendous stress. A child may be asked to play quietly, not to disturb the perpetrator, stay out of the way, or told that the abuse is in the past if they can all “behave appropriately”. The next phase, the violence phase lasts a few minutes to a few hours and is typically marked by loss of control, deciding if medical treatment is needed, feeling trapped, and defending the perpetrator to law enforcement out of fear. During the violence phase, children are at a high-risk of abuse themselves. A child may try to defend the victim and the perpetrator’s rage is directed toward the child. The final phase, before the cycle starts again, is called the honeymoon phase. In the honeymoon phase the environment becomes less stressful, an illusion of stability, belief that the violence was the victims fault, and believing that the perpetrator will never commit violence again. During this phase children can become confused by the events and learn to bury their feelings about IPV, furthering trust issues within the …show more content…
System- Change in IPV, changes the entire system and all members must readjust- what will the “new” family look like if mom and kids leave? What does it look like if they stay and dad gets help? How does this effect family members? Mother’s return to those whom have committed acts IPV against them a mean of 5 times before permanently leaving (Cohen, Mannarino, Iyengar 2011). During this time the child may not receive the support needed to fully understand their emotions and move forward emotionally. For that reason the child may self-blame for the abuse or the change in family. When one partner leaves the roles within the family change exorbitantly. The partner that has left, often feels lost, insecure and relies heavily on those around them for support, including children. Many IPV victims find it difficult to leave because of economic reasons and lack of resources to leave the abusive relationship. How do the roles
IPV is any form of aggression and or controlling behavior used against a current or past intimate partner of any gender, or relationship status, primarily committed by males against women. The theory is rooted in the notion that males who abuse women are adhering to societal notions that support male dominance and female subordination (Dixon & Graham-Keva, 2011). I will examine and apply these theories as to answer the question “why do victims stay in abusive relationships.” Both theories give insight and provide behavioral factors as well as characteristics of a domestic violence victim. The theories seemingly serve as a pinpointed timeline that’s reflective of the psychological journey Francine Hughes experienced. While the theories do touch on aspect of the abusers must control the woman, the theories are primarily focused on the mindset of the victim in relation to staying and or leaving the abusive
Intimate partner violence is still a common issue that affects women from all walks of life. It is an issue that is too often ignored until the violence has become deadly. In the book “Women: Images and Realities a Multicultural Anthology,” chapter seven entitled “Violence Against Women” includes pieces that cover the issue of intimate partner violence. In Michele McKeon’s piece “Understanding Intimate Partner Violence” she states that “In 1994 the Violence Against Women Act was passed, revolutionizing programs, services, and funding for individuals affected by intimate partner violence and their families” (McKeon 497). Yet the revolutionized programs, which McKeon speaks of, haven’t changed the fact that the violence continues and in my opinion, it is not enough to just deal with the aftermath of the violence, the prevention of intimate partner violence is something that society needs to address. In addition, McKeon also states “The Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that 1,181 women were murdered by their intimate partners in 2005; two million women experience injurie...
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a type of abuse that occurs between people who are involved in a close relationship. “Intimate partner” is a term that is used to include both current and former spouses as well as dating partners. IPV exists along a continuum that ranges from a single episode of violence through ongoing battering.
Megan R. Holmes discusses Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and the effects it has on children. She starts her article by stating that one in seven men and one in four women have experienced IPV, and the households with female victims show that thirty-eight percent have children under the age of twelve living there. References Holmes, M. R. (2013). The sleeper effect of intimate partner violence exposure: long-term consequences on young children's aggressive behavior. Journal Of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 54(9), 986-995 Katz, C. (2014).
There exists a vast amount of literature that suggests that there is a connection between intimate partner violence and maladaptive outcomes for children. Studies have shown that children who witness violence undermine the children’s sense of security. Intimate partner violence (IPV) proves to be distressing and deregulating for the children victims of intimate partner violence. Not only is witnessing violence distressing for children, but it has also been shown that it can interfere with the deal with stressors and learn age-appropriate skills. While there have been many studies that show the effects of IPV on the development of children, there have not been studies that show how IPV can affect children’s memory skills.
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is historically referred to as domestic violence. It describes a pattern of coercive and assaultive behavior that may include psychological abuse, progressive isolation, sexual assault, physical injury, stalking, intimidation, deprivation, and reproductive coercion among partners (The Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF), 1999). IPV leads to lifelong consequences such as lasting physical impairment, emotional trauma, chronic health problems, and even death. It is an issue effecting individuals in every community, regardless of age, economic status, race, religion, nationality or educational background. Eighty-five percent of domestic violence victims are women (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003). More than one in three women in the United States have experienced rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012). Thirty to sixty percent of perpetrators tend to also abuse children in the household (Edelson, 1999). Witnessing violence between parents or caretakers is considered the strongest risk factor of transmitting violent behavior from one generation to the next (Break the Cycle, 2006).
exposed to family violence: I. Overview and issues. Couple And Family Psychology: Research And Practice, 1(S), 63-73. doi:10.1037/2160-4096.1.S.63
The Center of Disease Control highlights the corresponding injuries and violence prevention topics through the division of intimate partner violence into four main types, which are physical, sexual, threats of physical or sexual, and psychological or emotional. Physical violence includes the purposeful use of physical force such as shoving, choking, shaking, slapping, punching, burning that results in physical harm, disability, or even death (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Sexual violence is forcing a partner to take part in a sex act when the partner does not consent. Threats of physical and sexual harm communicate the intent to cause death, disability, injury, or physical harm through the use of words, gestures, or weapons. “Psychological or emotional violence traumatizes the victim by acts, threats of acts, or coercive tactics” (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). This method can be induced thr...
Exposure to violence in the first years of life brings about helplessness and terror which can be attributed to the lack of protection received by the parent. The child can no longer trust their parent as a protector (Lieberman 2007). This lack of trust early in life can bring about serious problems later in life, as there is no resolution to the first psychosocial crisis, trust vs. mistrust. For these children exposed to domestic violence, the imaginary monsters that children perceive are not only symbolic representations or a dream. The monsters that children who witness domestic violence have to deal with carry the reflection of their parents. Children who witness domestic violence face a dilemma because the children’s parents are at their most frightening exactly when the child needs them the most. The security of the child is shatter...
Lemmey, D., McFarlane, J., Willson, P., Malecha, A. (2001). Intimate partner violence: mother’s perspectives of effects on their children. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 26(2), 98-103.
Introduction to Intimate Partner Violence Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a tremendously serious social and public health problem. Progression of intimate partner violence can lead to morbidity or mortality and affect various types of relationships. An intimate partner is one that is described by frequent contact, identifying as a couple, emotional bonding, and regular physical and/or sexual contact. A few examples of intimate partners include dating partners, spouses, girlfriends or boyfriends, and sexual partners. Violence within these intimate relationships can be psychological, physical, or sexual and present in heterosexual relationships, homosexual relationships, and to disabled partners in relationships.
Throughout the course of one’s lifetime, there are countless events that shape the personality, actions and mentality of that individual. Some of these events will affect the individual in a positive way allowing great life opportunities, while other events will unfortunately affect the individual in a negative way which can lead to disorders. Among the various events that can affect a person, one of the most common occurrences that some children witness early on in their lives that deeply affect their long-term mental health is being a witness to domestic violence. Research and observations that were studied revealed that there are multiple factors that can contribute to a child witnessing domestic violence. The more categories that the child falls into, the more likely they are to develop mental health issues later on in their life (Meltzer, Doos, Vostanis, Ford, and Goodman, 2009). The research conducted by Meltzer et al. (2009), was used to study the factors that were intertwined with domestic violence, as well as to better understand the needs of children who have witnessed the violence at a young age.
Domestic violence can happen to anyone, but Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is the most common violence to be committed in society (Ursa& Koehn, 2015).Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)is violence perpetrated by one intimate partner against the other partner (Halket, Gormley, Mello, Rosenthal, &Mirkin, 2014). IPV does not include elder or child abuse. Although women are likely to be victims of domestic violence, research shows that men are victims of domestic violence as well.(Halket, Gormley, Mello, Rosenthal, &Mirkin, 2014).For example, when violence is related to the family conflict there is a 4:1 ratio between females and males (Halket, Gormley, Mello, Rosenthal, &Mirkin, 2014). However, statistics reveals that more than 90% of violence is committed by a male
How does domestic violence between parents and parental figures affect the children who witness it? This is a question often asked by Sociologists and Psychologists alike. There have been studies that prove that children who witness domestic inter-parental violence experience mental health problems, issues with gender roles, substance abuse, the committing of crimes and suicide/suicide attempts later in their lives. This paper will explore all five of these 'effects' of domestic violence on children and show that there is evidence of a clear relationship in which increasing parental violence is associated with increasing outcome risks (Fergusson & Horwood, 1998, p.8).
“Domestic violence is a violent confrontation between family or household members involving physical harm, sexual assault, or fear of physical harm” (Stewart & Croudep, 1998-2012). In most places, domestic violence is looked at as one of the higher priorities when trying to stop crime. Domestic violence cases are thought to be influenced by the use of alcohol, drugs, stress or anger, but in reality, they are just learned behaviors by the batterer. These habits can be stopped as long as one seeks help (Stewart & Croudep, 1998-2012). For instance, a child is brought up in a household that is constantly involved in criminal acts.