"I don't really like these internet regulations because they want to cut off a lot of websites that many people like. In some ways I do get why there putting on internet regulations on. There is a lot of bad stuff on the internet like people doing bad stuff. Like this is a example of youtube, they had terrorist videos and people dying and they were putting ads and sponsored on the bad videos. So the ads and the sponsors don't go on youtube and the sponsors give money to youtube for there ads being on youtube and so they deleted their contract with youtube and so they don't get paid anymore.
So now a whole bunch of youtubers don't get paid as much. So bad stuff on the internet has affected a lot of websites in a bad way. So this internet regulations thing might actually bad or good. I'll be mad if it cut off apps like instagram or snapchat or other social media apps. They could make it to where you have to pay extra money to use the app.
…show more content…
A lot of people get income from youtube or other websites from people viewing them or watching them. So if they get internet regulations then people can't watch them and then a lot of income will go down. It is also good because there is a lot of mean people on the internet and there is a bunch of threats in schools and that is very bad. If they do agree on using net neutrality, this will cause major problems. People who value some of these apps will be furious that they will have to pay to use the apps they want to use. And will start to argue and maybe even start riots for the issue. And if they riot, the riots may interfere with government work. And then there will be this whole thing that nobody wants and it’s just a burden that shouldn’t have been brought up in the first
... good and safe concise decisions. Censoring laws on the internet now are important to protect kids most; and all others at risk. We need more laws enacted against exploitation and privacy against potential harm while using the internet. We are supposed to protect the weak. Therefore as a whole we can prosper in future generations hand in hand with our technological advancements.
Although the net neutrality debate didn’t come into the spot light so long ago, it has sparked controversy in the communications world. This concept provides a positive impact to the consumers, competition and network owners/internet service providers. It broadens the aspect of equality, which the open Internet was first based on. The profound effects on the aforementioned players provide a supported purpose to regulate the notion of net neutrality.
Net Neutrality requires to give everyone access to everything on the internet. This means that your internet provider won’t charge you for using specific websites. But with this, companies will have the ability to charge you for using basic things such as email, Spotify and even YouTube. Fast and slow lanes will also be included which may vary depending of what packages you paid for. But that is just the beginning, being that with this they will be able to control what you are able to see and not, ending Freedom of Speech in the
This would affect everyone and me. I specifically use the internet to read about controversial views and other information that gets ignored by the media or isn’t circulated anymore. Most of these sites fall on the black list of censors. A small percentage of users post conspicuous posts, graphic material, and infringing copyright links. Although inappropriate, it shouldn’t demand internet censorship, because it goes against the individual rights of the people.
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
With the rapid development of the technology, Internet has become a significant part in our daily life. The Internet does make our lives convenient, but at the same time, it raises many issues, like Internet violence, Internet fraud and Internet privacy. This report focuses on the Internet privacy issue. While enjoying the benefit, Internet users are asked to offer lot of their person information. Luzak (2014) argues that users should be clearly and comprehensively informed of the use of their personal privacy. He points out that Internet users are lack of information that cookies are set to store their tracks when they surf the Internet. Luzak analyzes the limitation of the current European
that some of the material that is on the net needs to be filtered and regulated. The word censorship is defined as examining any material and prohibiting what is objectionable, according to Webster’s II dictionary. Censoring the internet is a violation of the first ammendment rights of every citizen in the United States. There are two general truths that some people feel are attitudes towards censoring the internet. The first is that very few people admit to favoring it. The second is that no matter who you are, in a matter of minutes spent surfing the net almost anyone can find something that they find to be offensive. In fact, some web surfers feel that the truly inappropriate things are inspired by one’s own religion. For example, the Nurenberg Files website showed pictures of mangled fetuses with the photograph, name, and address of some abortion clinic doctors.
... it could affect other aspects of our online lives. At this point we may just pay for it. However, there truly is middle ground, but unfortunately most people are not looking at it – nor is this article. It's not an either/or situation as everyone has put forward. We simply need to control what users are able to contribute to the internet, and where, rather than either allowing them to uncontrolled, or not at all.
For example, the people of Guatemala have several different sim cards to have free access to different services such as WhatsApp and Facebook. In different countries around the Iberian Peninsula, people would purchase “packages” to have access to the different type of social media such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc. In Morocco, there has been blocked access on certain voice over app due to interest on the internet company. This forces many Moroccans to change their phone plan to have access to the application. With the internet being neutral this allows people with website to express themselves freely. It allows individuals to be protected from ISPs because certain service providers can sensor content that they do not agree with. With net neutrality in place, it reframes ISPs from altering the flow of the data because they do not agree with its content, blocking access, and changing
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
The Internet rebellion has left a vast distribution of strains, and has produced about changes affecting the privacy rules. The development of laws in Europe and United States like SOPA and PIPA had encouraged a lot of reactions and brings the discussion to center stage. Assume for example YouTube is likely one of the best, you can see music videos for free (in spite of the regular advertisements), see how the artists look without doing to pay etc. It makes a new generation of web artists, most of the time going by.
Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.
Internet safety and privacy is being threatened and with government censorship, things will definitely get better. Thus, this resolution should be highlighted and debated so everyone can know what the government could have done, but haven’t fully accomplished. (FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the Internet was "simply too important to be left without rules and a referee on the field.") … because it will boost people’s confidence in the Internet and make people more willing to use it for everyday lives which eventually make lives easier and everything more productive. ➜ Evidence: Increased productivity allows people to get what they want faster, or to get more of what they want in the same amount of time. Supply rises with productivity, dropping real prices and increasing real wages; it lifts people out of poverty and allows them to focus on efforts beyond mere survival.
Free speech on the Internet is a very controversial subject and has been the key problem surrounding the Internet today. The attempt to regulate and govern the Internet is still pursued by government officials. This subject has been intensified due to terrorist attacks against the United States and around world within the past years. The government believes that by regulating the Internet, it will protect the general public from criminal actions and eliminate the exposure of children to pornography or vulgar language. Senator Jim Exon of ...
Today, society is affected by the many advances in technology. These advances affect almost every person in the world. One of the prevalent advances in technology was the invention and mass use of the Internet. Today more than ever, people around the world use the Internet to support their personal and business tasks on a daily basis. The Internet is a portal into vast amounts of information concerning almost every aspect of life including education, business, politics, entertainment, social networking, and world security. (idebate.com) Although the Internet has become a key resource in developing the world, the mass use of Internet has highlighted a major problem, privacy and the protection of individual, corporate, and even government security . The argument over whether or not the Internet should be controlled by the government has developed into a controversial issue in almost every country in the world.