Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of the internet to society
Benefits of the internet to society
Benefits of the internet system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of the internet to society
As citizens of the U.S., we have an obligation to become informed about public issues, to carefully observe our political leaders and representatives use their powers, and to express our own opinions and interests. We the people have a right to use the internet. However, does the internet have a positive or negative influence on a democracy? For today, it certainly is not positive (it is flawed and messy), but I would not classify it as seriously negative either. This is not to say that that will not change. I think that the internet has the ability to become a very bad influence on our democracy.
On the surface, the internet seems to be a great influence. However, you have to go deeper. Nearly everyone that I have found to believe that the internet is a good influence have stood behind at least one of these six key reasons:
1. The Internet lowers the entry barriers to political participation.
2. It strengthens political dialogue.
3. It creates community.
4. It cannot be controlled by government.
5. It increases voting participation.
6. It permits closer communication with officials.
Sounds pretty good right? Well, unfortunately, not all of those points are in sync with reality and others don’t take into account the future.
1.) The Internet lowers the entry barriers to political participation.
While the internet is lowering the entry barriers to political participation today, it will not be long before it makes make politics more expensive, thus further raising the entry barriers. How does this work? Think about the internet right now. Anyone can say anything. That is great everyone has a voice. right? For now it is. As time goes by all of those “voices” start to pile up. It is just a sloppy mess. When everyone can sp...
... middle of paper ...
...nger have to physically wait in line to vote, because they can just vote online, voter turnout might increase. This I would have to agree with. However, electronic voting posses other issues. For one, the civic engagement of voting is eliminated, but that is not the most serious issue. With the greater ease and anonymity of voting, a market for votes is unavoidable.
6.) It permits closer communication with officials.
Everyday more people are jumping on the internet. While it was easier and very effective to communicate with officials a several years ago, as more people join the internet, it becomes impossible for officials to respond to every email, message, or comment. It will only get worse, soon it will just be assistants and aids that reply on the official’s behalf. Other than the fact that it is faster, how is that any better than just writing a letter?
In this article Mary Kate Cary opens up with the supreme court decision to not restrict the use of corporate funds in political advertising so that she can make her point that big money ads are not the most effective way for candidates to reach American constituents. She argues that social media is a new way for politicians to connect with citizens. Her five claim are that Americans can now, choose the media they wish to consume, share the media they choose the share, like posts they agree with and dislike posts they do not agree with, connect with others on social media, and donate to candidate campaigns online. With these claims she comes to the conclusion that politicians want to go around mainstream media so that they can connect directly with the voters.
By implementing change in my life, I was able to better myself and I couldn’t have done it without the internet. Granted, cyberbullying is a viscous act that is still practiced to this day, but when used correctly, the internet can perform and entice an individual to feel motivated and
10. "Study: Impact of Internet on Democracy." Study: Impact of Internet on Democracy. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Jan. 2014. .
The internet has made things quick and easy to accomplish, but it has had negative effects on concentration and the reading abilities of individuals. The internet is changing many thing around us, but maybe not all are good changes.
During the course of this book, Panagopoulos and Weinschenk discuss the election system that exists in the United States today, including such topics as the roles of money, political parties, media, and special interest groups. While exploring what went wrong and why, the authors maintain that these problems have solutions and those solutions are within the existing institutions and systems. After careful analysis, Panagopoulos and Weinschenk determined that the root of these problems is found in the level of citizen participation, or the lack of participation, in the election process. Some citizens are involved at a deeper level by working on campaigns and seeking out opposing opinions while others simply follow the party line and vote
I must say that the internet has also strengthened intelligent thought in a way previously impossible. What Google has done? It continues to improve the ways to handle information, performing countless of improvements on the original search engines to provide information at our fingertips, contextually arranged and relevant to our current times. Google and other technologies truly have enabled the free exchange of ideas, opinions, concepts and the experiences of our shared humanity. It has turned our individual communities into one big global community. The transformative effects of the internet, sometimes organized by Google promote a huge step forward for future generations. This global phenomenon we called Internet has a way to match our natural ways of acquiring information, all enhanced learning and current times shows clear evidence that more people talk to each other, reading each other's work, writing to each other, sharing information, and creating and sharing their lives and work via the internet, as individuals or as
The internet is shaping the way we think in more ways than one, and according to Carr (2008), it is suggests that the internet can lead to intellectual laziness. Depending on the internet as a source for information leads to an artificial intelligence. Carr also believes the media is always shaping how we think Carr (2008). Although Carr might not be the most credible due to his augment relying mostly on testimonial evidence, he has a good point. Imagine for a moment sitting in a class room and a professor asks a question. Some students will be right, and others will be wrong which leads to an opportunity for learning. However, if every student were to google the answer to that question each and every student would be correct. See the problem? With reliant use of the internet for information there is no room for creativity or learning.
Robert Kraut et al. presented the no side of this issue. Kraut focused on two major themes, Internet for entertainment, information and commerce, similar to the television, meaning it could reinforce social bonds or reduce social involvement, and interpersonal communication, similar to the telephone rather than the television.
The Internet has created a generation of the most efficient multi-taskers ever born. Many people will have at least four tabs open as a time (Google, Facebook, Youtube, Pandora, Wikipedia, Gmail, etc.). People are constantly jumping from one web page to the next, clicking on links and opening new tabs and browsers. The method through which knowledge is gained has transitioned from deep reading to fast skimming. Every time a web page is opened the viewer is bombarded with information, almost every page has advertisements or links to additional information lining its sides. The Internet has made mountains of information available to almost anyone. It is fast and easy to find information and facts. Essentially the Internet has become the fast food of knowledge. It is convenient but it skips the element of effort.
This paper is going to explore the topic of e-democracy. As our society becomes more enthralled with technology and communication via the Web, it is important to consider what kind of methods and tools we use to communicate about issues that vastly affect everyone. Although some believe that there are positives and negatives regarding e-democracy, every subject is going to have pros and cons. Throughout this paper, I am going to explore what the “mainstream” media has written about e-democracy and both the positives and negatives of it as well. By using previous research, I would like to express why I think e-democracy’s positives outweigh the negatives and how society can benefit from such a technological breakthrough.
But can having this kind of power be a bad thing. I believe that in some cases it is and the internet can be highly dangerous if it is abused or used in the wrong hands. This is because the internet as much of a benefit it may be does have the potential to put other people at risk for anything from physical to psychological harm. People can use the internet to perform illegal activities such as:
...e heard. Digital democracy also reaches more people. The option of voting online or allowing someone to voice their opinion over an online forum is beneficial to citizens who live out of town and would not be willing to vote by absentee ballot. In addition, the technological aspect also appeals to younger citizens who may not have previously cared for politics. Also, I think it is attractive to all citizens because it saves an immense amount of time and is extremely more convenient than having to attend public forums or standing in lines to vote. Lastly, I think it is inevitable that we incorporate politics with the digital age. So much of our lives are already incorporate with technology. It makes sense that our politics should join that incorporation as well. I realize that digital democracy has obvious disadvantages, but in this case, the good outweighs the bad.
In addition to this the internet has affected my life in that it allows me to be bold and create something amazing without anyone’s permission. Back in the pre internet age in order to learn and progress at something you had to either to read an often times outdated book, or find someone to teach you the information. Once you obtained enough knowledge about your craft you had to work under someone in somewhat of an apprenticeship and were essentially not allowed to move up in the industry until they deemed you fit to do so. You had to have someone else’s permission to progress further in your work. Today the internet allows anyone to create something amazing, and the low barrier to entry makes it so that no one has an excuse to not be great. Two college kids created the website Reddit with nothing but a laptop, an internet connection, and some Ramen noodles, and today the site gets over 8 Billion visits a month! Such a duo wouldn’t have even been an afterthought without the power of the
The internet has influenced, and is still influencing the way society communicates in many different ways. The rise of the internet has caused people to communicate differently in areas never dreamed of before the internet came into existence. Education has been revolutionized through the world of the “Information Super Highway”. Medicine has also seen reform as the internet improves research and communication. Individuals are starting businesses from scratch, while others are selling household items for extra cash. This internet “typhoon” sweeping the globe has become a way of life for many individuals all across the globe.
Internet has been acknowledged as one of the most efficient way to collect and reflect public opinions, for that people with different classes and races can express their opinions with no obstacles in virtual network spaces. People can speak out whatever they want just by typing on the keyboard within a second. Dr. Heather Savigny mentions in her article “Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet” that “The expansion of the internet as a new method of communication provides a potential challenge to the primacy of the traditional media and political parties as formers of public opinion” (1). People realized that the power of internet public opinion in the focus on social issues can be used as a weapon to affect government decision-makings. However, does public opinion only brings positive effects?