Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global market entry strategies
Global market entry strategies
International market entry strategy advantages and disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Global market entry strategies
1.1 Background of the study Internationalization significantly represents value creation and growth for firms of all shapes and sizes (Root, 1994). This is mainly because it creates new opportunities for the majority of firms. Internationalization is a very broad term; however, it can be defined as “Expanding a firm’s business from its original location to one or more additional foreign markets to enter” according to Barringer and Greening (1998). Recently, internationalization has increasingly become a crucial issue even for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) due to the international growth (Hollensen et al., 2014). The internationalization of SMEs has increasingly been facilitated by the reduction in trade barriers, transport costs as well …show more content…
Since China joined the WTO in 2001,which has significantly further opened up the massive Chinese market for foreign investments and trading. China has witnessed a remarkable economic growth and due to its huge population, China has become a major player in the world economy. Furthermore, China has a huge potential consumer market due to a dramatic expansion of the middle class in China (KPMG, 2004). Therefore, China appears to be one of the most attractive markets for many multinational companies (KPMG, 2004). Since 2003, China has become the biggest target country for international investments following by the United States (KPMG, 2004). In addition, China has recently further liberalized the government regulations and restrictions toward foreign business operation in China. These basically allow foreign firms to pursue their preferred entry mode choices. However, the Chinese market is heterogeneous, large, complex and not easily accessible (MOFCOM, 2013). Therefore, the choice of the entry mode is significantly considered as a frontier issue in the international marketing (Root, …show more content…
al, 1990). Significantly, the initial selection of entry mode can have a huge impact on the survival and success of firm international operations (Hollensen, 2011; Root, 1994). The international operations in the target market basically depend on the firm’s choice of foreign entry modes (Hollensen et al., 2014). Many scholars on international market entry strategies examined that whilst making the decision regarding foreign market entry mode, there was a wide range of factors that influenced a firm’s entry mode decision. The entry mode decision can be influenced by different set of factors as the entry modes involve with different levels of control, ownership and resource commitment (Hollensen et al., 2014). The choice of entry modes between exporting, contractual agreement (licensing and franchising), joint venture and wholly owned enterprise are all strategic alternative (Lin, 2000). Therefore, managers need to analyze and determine the most suitable international strategy to enter a foreign country. After reviewing previous entry mode research, most of the research primarily focused on the experience of large multinational enterprises rather than SMEs that discussed about their entry mode strategy in foreign markets (Luo, 2001). Moreover, extant literatures on the entry modes have been
Ever since China open its doors to the outside world, it has widely become a fighting space for foreign investors and business to raid in and take advantage of the vulnerable but growing economy, during that period. This has led to China today being one of the highest countries with foreign investments. Before China’s Open Door Policy in 1979, China was in a crucial point in trying to grow its economy. Balancing out the growing population and the need for jobs led to the idea of foreign investors and opening their doors to the rest of the world.
I found this article "Foreign direct investment: Companies rush in with the cash" on the financial times website (www.FT.com) published December 11, 2002 written by John Thornhill. The reason for choosing this article is my personal interest in the Chinese economy and its attractiveness to the foreign investors. Apart from the foreign direct investment this topic has also helped me in understanding the impact of Chinese economy on the global market.
Hill, C., Wee, C. and Udayasankar, K. 2012.International Business:An Asian Perspective. 8th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
With a population of 1.357 billion (2013)3, China is the most populated country in the world. Along with the huge population comes a market that is unmatched by any other country of the world. Both domestic companies and foreign companies want to tap into this large market that just recently embraced capitalism and entered into the World Trade Organization.
Shirley Ye, Sheng, and Yan Ma. "China Vs. The United States: Market Connections And Trade Relations." International Journal Of China Marketing 2.1 (2011): 45-57. Business Source Complete. Web. 13 Dec. 2013.
Firms exist with the purpose of create and deliver economic value (Bensaco et al 2010, p. 365); therefore, business that create better economic value than its competitors will attain an advantage position in market place. Companies might try to improve its sales (profit) through domestic expansion, product diversification or by internationalisation; this report will focus on the reasons of espressamente Illy to expand internationally; additionally, its sources of competitive advantage and, the analysis of three markets in which company want to participate.
The ease with which firms can enter into a new market or industry is a critical variable in the strategic management process. In some industries the barriers to entry are minimal. In oth...
Foreign Market Entry 1.0 Objectives The author’s objective in this article is to discuss the effective modes of entry for businesses that are planning to venture into international markets. The entry modes and methods discussed are aimed at helping businesses to formulate an effective international business strategy and to position themselves to be successfully established in the global market. 2.0 Central Theory The central theory introduced in this article is developed based on a comprehensive framework of the entry modes choices.
These factors encourage the SME to seek a non EU market and a central location where it can gain advantage from a lot of
Why would a company go international? There are many reasons why companies would go international, but generally a company goes international so they can seek opportunities in domestic markets, or they seek solutions to problems that cannot be solved through domestic operations. There are many profitable possibilities by going internationally and these include greater profit potential, offers new locations to sell products, it may provide better access to needed raw materials, it may access to financial resources from many nations, and lastly it may allow labour-intensive activities to locate in countries with lower labour costs. For a small business to become an international business they must use five guidelines the first is global sourcing, exporting and importing, licensing and franchising, joint ventures, and wholly owned subsidiaries. The first two are market entry strategies and the remaining are direct investment strategies.
The economical perspective which relates to multinational enterprises and their international operations and the behavioral perspective that is emphasized on the process of internationalization. This study is focused on the behavioral perspective of the internationalization of SMEs (Amal and Rocha Freitag Filho, 2010; Ruzzier et al., 2006). Additionally, Ruzzier et al., (2006) suggests that the models concerning the internationalization of SMEs can be divided into the market, firm or entrepreneur perspective. This study is focussed on the firm perspective since it emphasizes on the “stage” model of internationalization. The two general stage models of internationalization are the Uppsala internationalization model (U-model) and the innovation-related model (I-model), which describes the development of internationalization and the international operations. Both models are driving the incremental nature of the internationalization process in which the activities and resources are seen as the main components of the behavior of the firm (Ruzzier et al., 2006; Amal and Rocha Freitag Filho,
There exists differences in each countries environment and an MNE needs to understand the business environment in the host country in order to enter the market and do successful business in that economy. Many MNE’s struggle to develop successful strategies for entering the foreign market because of the absence of specialized intermediaries, contract enforcing mechanisms and regulatory systems that have a direct impact on the implementation of strategies used by MNE’s.
Oesterie, M. J., Richta, H. N., & Fisch, J. H. (2012). The influence of ownership structure on internationalization. International Business Review, 22(1), 187-201.
Globalization can not only affect a company opening an office in another country but it can affect a small local business as well. As the internet brings the world closer together it becomes far more likely that a business that opened with no intention of selling internationally will have customers form different parts of the world asking for their product. For instance a steel company located in Pennsylvania may suddenly find orders coming in from South American factories. How the steel plant chooses to handle this new international customer could mean ...
This research aim was to investigate the motivation and patterns of SSA firms’ internationalisation studying firms from different sector of the economy. The findings suggest that various factors were interplay in the motivation and patterns of Nigerian firms’ international rather than a single factor. The study draw on the internationalisation theory (Uppsala Model) and OLI model as the theoretical positioning for the study (Johanson and Vahlne, 1977 and 1990; Dunning, 1988). The finding reveals that case firms’ internationalisation process was gradual, consistent with the Uppsala model, but there also exists contradiction in some aspect of the findings. For example ADG international experience started as an importer rather as an export