Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis on churchill speech
World War II Causes and Pre-war Europe essay
World War II Causes and Pre-war Europe essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetorical analysis on churchill speech
International Relation By Name: Presented to Institution Instructor Course Date International Relation Outline I. Introduction A. Setting of the speech B. The time and period when the speech was made C. Audience II. Content A. Europe is Divided B. Communist Fifth Column C. War is Not Inevitable III. Insight of the Speech IV. Conclusion V. Bibliography Introduction “The Sinews of Peace”, was the heading of a speech given by Winston Churchill. In the audience there was the noticeable presence of President McClure. It was one of his supreme speeches, Iron Curtain, given by him as a British prime minister (Reynolds, 2006, pp. 250-252). The setting or rather the place of the occasion was in Fulton, Missouri, at the Westminster College. …show more content…
The first part of the speech focuses on the fact that Europe is divided. He uses the term “iron curtain” to refer to the partitioning. At this point of time, Europe had been partitioned into Communist and non-Communist subjects of authority (Muller, 1999). In his speech, he argues that in order to prevent the stretching of the communist ideals, the Western democracies should first and for most pick up the initiative to control the communist movement. According to Churchill, there would be an occurrence of a calamity if they did not succeed in preventing the ideals. Churchill further supported his argument by linking the situation or rather comparing it with the World War II and the ways in which it would have been avoided without causing the loss of the many lives. He assumes that their energy put forth would be rendered futile if the communism stretched further. This is clearly brought out when he said, that that was surely not the unconventional Europe they had fought to put up. Neither was it the one which enclosed the fundamentals of everlasting tranquility. This clearly bestows us the notion that acquiring of peace would be impossible if communism existed. The second part of the speech majorly focuses on the Communist Fifth Column. The Fifth Columns are representatives in a country who combine efforts with the Soviet to help in bringing transformation …show more content…
He goes ahead to claim that war will not automatically come to pass, even if the condition is severe (due to the stretching of the Soviet Union). This is because the Russians are against the war. He believes the Soviets will attempt to pave the way for their welfare as much as possible without fighting. He thinks that the United States, Britain, the democracies and the Commonwealth should come together on the basis of common ground which is to create resistance against the Russians’ strategies, believing that this will form a basis for Russia to reassess its growth actions. Churchill also speaks for a restoration between Great Britain and the United States, as it was a great coalition during the time of war. He calls this treaty or rather alliance the “Special Relationship.” This coalition was of great meaning during World War II leading to their ultimate triumph. Churchill also believes that a very important energy will be established if a well-built bond is created between the Great Britain and the United States. This will create a fresh power to counter the expansion of the Soviet movement (Roberts, 2006, p.122). He believes that peace may be conserved and the progress of Russia blocked, if a familiar strategy is structured by the Western nations. Churchill’s most important worry is that the United States might go back to the guiding principle of isolationism which had once
This quote shows that The Soviet Union started to agree to the terms of The United States and Great Britain. The Soviet Union agreed to a lot before the Yalta conference ended, but afterward they went back on their word. Instead of allowing free elections they said they would do, The Soviet Union did nothing completely ignoring Great Britain and The United States. The United States began to get bothered by that but tried to iit to focus on the main goal, defeating the Nazis. Once the main goal was achieved, they began to realize why they were never allies
Churchill claims the Soviet Union wanted the fruits of war the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.
On June 12, 1987, former President Ronald Reagan gave one of his famous speeches, “Remarks at the Brandenburg Gate.” On a superficial level, Reagan uses the speech to petition to the Soviet Union for peace, nuclear and chemical arms reduction, and the demolition of the Berlin Wall. He also highlights the progress and prosperity that have arisen in the western world since the division between communism and democracy was established. Beyond the surface, Reagan subtly disparages communism while simultaneously building up democracy. He emphasizes the importance of freedom, liberty, free trade, and other democratic ideals and the positive effects the western world has experienced because of them.
“I found it. I found a single sustaining thought. The thought was, You and Phineas are even already. You are even in enmity. You are both coldly driving ahead for yourselves alone. . . . I felt better. Yes, I sensed it like the sweat of relief when nausea passes away; I felt better. We were even after all, even in enmity. The deadly rivalry was on both sides after all.”
By procuring the American government to consider “What kind of a people do [the Axis Powers] think we are? Is it possible [the Axis Powers] do not realize that we shall never cease to persevere against them until they have been taught a lesson which they and the world will never forget?(“Winston Churchill 'Masters of Our Fate' Speech to)” Winston Churchill brings up the idea that the Axis Powers underestimate the threat of America and the Allied powers and would not stop harassing the world unless the US and the Allied Powers joined together to terminate them. As a result, the rhetorical questions influenced the US Senate and The House of Representatives to admit to considering the truth that they are needed to defeat the growing threat of the Axis Powers. The significance of Churchill's questions are still effective today because it influenced the thoughts of the American politicians on their stance on the war. After the American government decided to get involved in WWII, new wars appeared for the US join such as the Cold War against Russia, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Therefore, the original questions Churchill once asked in 1941 contains influences on the events and questions the politicians in the America we live in
2 Charles S. Maier, ed., The Cold War in Europe: Era of a divided Continent (New York: Markus Wiener Publishing, Inc., 1991) 27.
Odd Arne Westad, Director of the Cold War Studies Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, explains how the Cold War “shaped the world we live in today — its politics, economics, and military affairs“ (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). Furthermore, Westad continues, “ the globalization of the Cold War during the last century created foundations” for most of the historic conflicts we see today. The Cold War, asserts Westad, centers on how the Third World policies of the two twentieth-century superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — escalates to antipathy and conflict that in the end helped oust one world power while challenging the other. This supplies a universal understanding on the Cold War (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1).
However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”
Communist influence - However, the Soviet Union is not completely seen as an enemy as Churchill acknowledges the fact that the USSR is not inclined to a war. Churchill also does not challenge the idea of collaboration between the Soviets and the Western powers. No concrete policy against the USSR yet. ...
Carl von Clausewitz, “What is War?” On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret, 89-112. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
Seton-Watson, H. (1960), Neither War nor Peace: The Struggle for Power in the Post-War World. Southampton: Camelot Press Ltd.
Todd, Allan. (2009) Democracies and Dictatorship: Europe and the World 1919-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Tomkinson, John L. (2008) The Cold War: Themes in Twentieth Century World History for the International Baccalaureate.
War.” Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War. Eds. Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999. 1-27.
The New Cold War. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing. Weber, Smith, Allan, Collins, Morgan and Entshami. 2002. Foreign Policy in a Transformed World. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
Whenever world politics is mentioned, the state that appears to be at the apex of affairs is the United States of America, although some will argue that it isn’t. It is paramount we know that the international system is shaped by certain defining events that has lead to some significant changes, particularly those connected with different chapters of violence. Certainly, the world wars of the twentieth century and the more recent war on terror must be included as defining moments. The warning of brute force on a potentially large scale also highlights the vigorousness of the cold war period, which dominated world politics within an interval of four decades. The practice of international relations (IR) was introduced out of a need to discuss the causes of war and the different conditions for calm in the wake of the first world war, and it is relevant we know that this has remained a crucial focus ever since. However, violence is not the only factor capable of causing interruption in the international system. Economic elements also have a remarkable impact. The great depression that happened in the 1920s, and the global financial crises of the contemporary period can be used as examples. Another concurrent problem concerns the environment, with the human climate being one among different number of important concerns for the continuing future of humankind and the planet in general.