Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalisation and dependency theory
International political economy midterm
Social division of society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Globalisation and dependency theory
1. Introduction The subject of the International Political Economy is commonly regarded as a branch of the broader field of International Relations. International relations has traditionally focused on addressing questions of war and peace as well as conflict and co-operation between nation states. A difficulty arose in the field when it could not provide answers or prescribe workable solutions for issues concerning wealth, poverty and the distribution of resources in the international system. The international political economy emerged as a response to the significant shift in international current and economic affairs. This essay will show the usefulness and effectiveness of the international political economy in explaining issues of poverty and wealth. 2. Definition of concepts This section will provide brief definitions and descriptions of the main concepts that are relevant to this essay and will be used throughout. 2.1 IPE An interdisciplinary social science concerned with the examination of the complex interactions between markets, states and societies, and how the tensions and conflicts between these arenas both affect and reflect conditions outside the state and society (Ballam and Dillman 2014:15). 2.2 Theory Theories are models that explain how the world works. They are often used as tools for analysis. Theories emerge at particular times and places offering contextual explanations for their emergence and the dominant forces (Denemark 1997:45). 2.3 Globalization This is the process by which the pursuit of economic liberal ideas and policies has led to increased economic growth across the world. It connotes increasing economic interdependence, boundaries that are difficult to determine and a spread of Western (US) cultu... ... middle of paper ... ...ine political and economic outcomes both domestically and internationally (Katzenstein et.al 1998:21). The structure of domestic state affairs is viewed as being divided into two. The proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie are those members of society who own the means of production and essentially the capital in a given society while the proletariat are the workers in the economic system. There is an exploitative relationship that exists between these two classes. For structuralists, the same domestic divisions have rippled into the international economic system. This is clear in the division of developed and developing countries. It therefore then follows that if the states acts to preserve and promote the interests of the owners of capital, internationally, the trade system will also preserve and promote the interests of the developed countries (REF).
The above excerpt was provided so that the student would know the focus of the essay. The complete essay begins below.
When the Declaration of Independence was signed July 4th, 1776, the United States of America was born. From then on, things have never been the same. For example, the country was no longer under the control of Great Britain; we became our own democracy away from monarchy rule of Great Britain. One policy of America that has changed dramatically over the past 200 years, and will continue to change in the coming years, is foreign policy. The idea of foreign policy has gone from the Roosevelt Corollary to the Truman Doctrine, to the Domino Theory, just in the 20th century.
In the interest of clarity, I will begin with a brief outline of some key concepts, and their relevance.
The 1800's were a renowned era in European history. With the rise of imperialism came the ruthless desire to seek new land through the use of authoritative implications. Whether it be the discovery of the Americas, where Christopher Columbus discovered various islands, which were clustered with indigenous people that were eventually completely wiped out for the pure desire of Spaniard power. This craving to "assimilate" indigenous people and to convert them to Christianity was an element, which rooted 19th century Europe. Although the actual question to whether these actions were good or evil are up for debate. Imperialism has been viewed as an expansion that serves only ones "object" and that it has no purpose beyond the benefit of the "self". This paper will explain Imperialism through a sociological perspective, while blending in notions of capitalism and modern day Imperialism that may now be viewed as Globalism.
Theory: A general statement about some parts of the world that fit together and how they work; an explanation of how two or more facts are related
The above excerpt was provided to make the student aware of the focus of the essay, the complete paper begins below:
“…increasing international trade and financial flows since the Second World War have fostered sustained economic growth over the long term in the world’s high-income states. Some with idle incomes have prospered as well, but low-income economies generally have not made significant gains. The growing world economy has not produced balanced, healthy economic growth in the poorer states. Instead, the cycle of underdevelopment more aptly describes their plight. In the context of weak economies, the negative effects of international trade and foreign investments have been devastating. Issues of trade and currency values preoccupy the economic policies of states with low-income economies even more than those with high incomes because the downturns are far more debilitating.1”
In conclusion, Collier thoroughly explains his reasons behind why the bottom billion countries are poor. His arguments covered a variety of the course concepts like internationalism, failed state, Globalization, and economic forces. However, after critical evaluation, it is clear that Collier ignored and underestimated several of these concepts.
Ultimately this essay will be discussing areas of wealth, power, poverty and who gets what in the international economic and political system under two vastly different, however in some ways interrelated, perspectives (Burnell & Randall, 2008). Firstly, what is economic nationalism? This ideology focuses in the roles of the state specifically its hierarchical role in shapin...
Politics is greatly influenced by the economies since they all aim at protecting and amassing more wealth (Giddens 2009). The countries with the greatest economies in the world are also the most powerful politically. Therefore, globalization being an important element in the global economy controls the nation-states and the international politics as a whole (Ritzer 2010). Globalization has made impossible for any nation-state to control the forces of the economies, but they have to align themselves to the trends in the global economics. In the traditional way, politics were confined to the national polit...
…world economic expansion should be least robust in a multipolar world where countries cannot be sure of stable alliances, more robust in a bipolar world because alliances are more predictable, and most robust in a unipolar or imperia...
One of the major problems with the analysis of liberalism is that markets are not a natural phenomenon. Liberalism often thinks that the market can adjust itself. However, the evidences from many economics crises show that there are instances where the markets are unable to adjust itself. Furthermore, economic liberalism does not look at the political and social context which is needed if we are to understand how economic actors operate. Liberalism sees individuals as rational actors operating in a system free from political boundaries and social constraints. However, actors are not always rational. Actors are not equal thus they don’t have the equal opportunity to achieve their set goals. Liberalism also only the reflection of the values and ideas associated with the capitalists. Thus, the analysis rather static and the virtues of the status quo are assumed. Furthermore, the lack of government control does not make the market stronger and individual prosperity greater as expect. The uneven distribution of income would create tension between the classes. At the international level, the asymmetry in term of development between North and South shows that liberalism only serves the interests of the strong, particularly a few developed states. Thus, liberal trade policy can create tensions between states instead of bringing peace. Furthermore, free trade has left many industries in different states crumble such as textile and agriculture. Many started to subsidies those products to keep the industry alive.
Introduction A system is a network of parts which interlock to form an overall pattern. An economic system is a pattern of organisation which is aimed at solving the three central questions discussed in the previous sections. Economic systems do not always work well, but they are often so vast and complicated that it is quiet marvellous that they work at all. Mohr & Fourie.(2008.
Money is extremely relevant in International relations because money makes vast amounts of people and goods go around the world to exchange skills and money respectively. Bonds are the main link between money and the international system, due to the fact that governments spend more than they can raise in tax resulting in them selling bonds to make up for their credit, furthermore bad debts within banks are the reason countries go bankrupt therefore loaning money from other countries hence money influences foreign policy because states are always power seeking. The pursuit of power can without a doubt be related to money and this money can be found if a state associates itself with the economies of other states.
The reaction of the nation state towards the impact of globalisation can take two routes. Firstly, the route towards protectionism where in nation states try to protect domestic markets from the cyclical downturns of the international markets by introducing stricter trade barriers and restricting free movement of goods and workers. However, considering that the integrated markets bring with it several benefits of international trade and also contribute financially deficit welfare states by utilising a labour force that is international, protectionist measures my result in closing of the state not only from such benefits but also from the movement of labour forces thereby reducing its productivity. In contrast, given that globalisation is an economic reality, nation states must provide a welfare state that caters not only to local specificities but to an international and diverse community where policies are aimed at ensuring a minimum safety net for all of its citizens that will help overcome the externalities of the globalised market. This may also be regarded as a formative stage of political