Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Studies on the bottled water industry
Indirect competitors for bottled water
Five forces analysis bottled water industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Studies on the bottled water industry
Although the IBWA-supported bill may prevent our park from receiving the funding needed to set us on the path to sustainability, I advise you to not agree to the deal proposed by the business coalition and, instead, follow procedure and apply for funding while it’s still available.
Background. In an effort to limit waste, the State Park Service (SPS) allowed individual state parks the choice to place a ban on the sales of non-reusable bottles within their parks. Such parks would, instead, provide water refill stations. Consequently, the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) has protested the change and is currently supporting a bill that would cut funding going to the new refill stations, and prohibit the SPS from putting any taxpayer
…show more content…
I advise you to not agree to the deal proposed by the business coalition because doing so would go against industry advice, enraging the IBWA. If the bill provisions are properly passed, and the SPS continues to find loopholes to continue to do what they desire, lobbying and interest groups would feel powerless by the lack of procedural fairness (cite: Kettl). The discontent this would cause could bring all government affairs into question. Additionally, we should be rightly concerned about the easily preventable risk (cite: Chenok) of the potential conflict of interest, especially when the coalition’s motives behind the deal are unclear. If they have not historically been supportive of the SPS or this park in the past, why now? Why do they want to study the possibility of increasing tour bus access to the park? Even if the deal is technically legal, it does not appear ethical (cite: Downe). Furthermore, you will likely alienate yourself from your fellow park heads if you attain special exemption from provisions, which is particularly concerning considering that you are new to the position. Finally, the provision in the bill that would prevent federal funding for refill stations has not been passed yet. The park should follow procedure and apply for a grant while it’s still available.
I appreciate the wisdom you have shown in seeking the opinions of others on this subject (cite: Sutton). However, whichever path you ultimately choose, you must stand firm in your
“The irony of thousands of ash trees being cut down this Arbor Day marks a tragic chapter in the history of Metroparks,” Jack Gallon, President of the Board of Park Commissions wrote in a letter to TCP, “One way we can channel our disappointment in a positive way is to urge our federal lawmakers to close the door to exotic species that arrive on American shores at the rate of one every eight months. The cost of prevention is small compared to the cost to our native plants and animals. Pearson Metropark is proof of what we stand to lose.”
I am writing in response to your request that I analyze Johnson 's "Bottled water, go away" and make a recommendation for or against publication in The Shorthorn. I have analysed Johnson 's rhetorical appeals and determined that the contents of her article are very relevant to The Shorthorn readers. I recommend this article to be published in The Shorthorn because it discusses bottled water and relates that with environment and health. Johnson 's claim, reasons, evidence, ethos, logos, pathos, counterargument are very relevant for readers of The Shorthorn. Especially readers who prefer bottled water and are not serious about the recycling of those bottles are the target audience of this publication but it
...ion that the proposal to drain Lake Powell is not a very good one " First off two Club members in page, AZ quit the club over the Lake Powell proposal" (www.glencanyon.net/club). The writer thinks that the board is wrong to propose such an idea "Lake Powell violated the club's policy that major decisions should start at the ground and work their way up" (www.glencanyon.net/club).
As the bottled water becomes more popular, people prefer to drink bottle water over tap water. According to them, it has a better quality and taste. Unfortunately, people are being fooled by the water industries. The “purified” water, as its label, comes from municipal reserves. This research will discuss:
parks system is a great way to get away. If we continue to allow our parks to
In the first article "The Curse of Water Bottles" the author is obviously trying to convince people to stop wasting bottles and recycle. For example "There are solutions like using your own personal water bottle and refilling it" and that would save from buying water bottles, and reduce some of the waste. It also states "Some cities are fining homeowners and businesses for not recycling" so that means even cities are trying to get people to stop wasting water bottles. Companies and/or states have tried putting rewards on the bottles if you return them, as stated "Some states have tried to put a nickel return fee on water bottles like those on soda and other beverages" but it still doesn't work out for everyone, because "grocery
4. The decision allowed the city council to postpone their vote for a week, and they suggested that the sites developer design a plan to save more of it’s trees.
The issue that confronts many Kentuckians is whether or not the Williams and Boardwalk Pipeline, commonly called the Bluegrass Pipeline, serves for public use. Many people say that the pipeline will benefit the economy and provide jobs, while others complain that the pipeline will cause more harm than good. I am here to argue with the latter, the pipeline will cause much more harm than good. The pipeline is less for public use and more for national and international.
The goals for the park are to preserve an area of cultural significance to the three affiliated First Nations, recognize the conventional and modern uses of the park by first Nations, promote the use and awareness of the natural, cultural and historical values of the park, understand the modern recreational uses of the park including tourism and to offer economic opportunities to First Nations [].
Since its creation in 1916, the National Park Service (NPS) has had to balance between its two goals, which are to preserve wilderness and nature and to provide the public with access to these wonders in a monitored environment. These two goals tend to create a conflict for the NPS because as soon as one goal is given more priority than the other, the administration of national parks is harshly criticized by the public. The accusation that by allowing people to experience the wilderness, the NPS is corrupting the natural environment is very common, as well, as the criticism towards the lack of government funding to preserve nature and history. However, regardless of arguable criticism and a certain need for improvement, after one hundred years,
Glenn, Stacia. "Youths Push for New Park." Student Research Center. N.p., 22 Aug. 2006. Web. 6 Dec. 2013.
According to the “Competition in the Bottled Water Industry in 2006 Case,” bottled water industry became the one of the world’s most attractive beverage categories, as more and more people began to focus on health and fitness. Consumers start realizing the need of proper hydration, and they began purchasing bottled water instead of drinking tap water, because they were worried about safety of tap water, which tasted like chemicals. Actually, tap water contained chemicals, such as chlorine and fluoride, which are harmful for human body; however, this problem was solved when the bottled water was brought to the market. Due to bottled water’s convenience, purity, and portability, and safety, bottled water industry began to rise rapidly. During
This budget includes a combination of visitor fees and the annual congressional appropriation that have totaled to a humble three billion yearly. This substandard budget is inadequate to an asset that is “valued at over $90 billion” (Bilmes and Loomis). The nation should make the National Park Service a top priority because even though they have worked this long with such a low budget, they are not capable of doing that anymore. Investing in the National Park Service and making it a top priority in the nation would benefit the agency’s budget, as well as the visitor’s experience. If the National Park Service did not exist, national parks and monuments would not be as well kept or visitable. The lowgrade budget of roughly three billion dollars annually is not acceptable to the “backlog of overdue maintenance projects that stands at $12 billion and rising” (Bilmes
...ill help the park in attracting new customers and increasing visits per customers. The park should also start the in house advertisement system, for this they should contact different corporate houses to make them aware about the advertisement facilities available within the park. This would help them in increasing their revenue.
Consumerism. While watching “The Story of Bottled Water,” I thought to myself, “Is this all true, or is this really being blown out of proportion?” I simply couldn’t grasp the idea that we as consumers are that wasteful. So, I decided to watch the film again to really grasp the narrator’s message. Then it hit me: in high school AP History, we discussed how bottled water started and how it has become a multi-billion-dollar company.