Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About organizational internal communications
Employee motivation and job performance
Employee motivation and job performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: About organizational internal communications
In a rapidly evolving corporate environment, research has identified the vital role played by the firm’s communication processes with its internal stakeholders who are mainly its employees. Intra-organizational communication has been linked to motivated, productive and satisfied employees who in turn become a competitive advantage allowing the company to survive in a highly competitive market environment. According to Omilion-Hodges & Baker (2014) employees are the embodiment of a company’s character and culture and thus are able to “sellor market” it to its external publics on various platforms provided they have explicit information and perfectly understand the objectives and goals of their organization (Omilion-Hodges & Baker, 2014). Notably, according to Mishra, Boyton & Mishra (2014) increased employee engagement is observed in instances where employees have an understanding of the strategies and development plans adopted by the firm , since they are aware how each individual, through their job, contributes considerably to the general success of the firm. Further, employee engagement enhances teamwork and cooperation and successively, exacts a positive influence on the overall productivity of the firm and, in the long run promote greater profitability (Mishra, Boyton & Mishra, 2014). Additionally, Dortok (2006), point to the link between efficient internal communication and increased financial performance, arguing that organizations that attach high value to communication with its employees are nearly two times as likely to outperform those that undervalue internal communication (Dortok, 2006).
Omilion-Hodges & Baker, (2014) an organization can only communicate effectively with its external publics if it recognizes of the c...
... middle of paper ...
...munication Quarterly, 28(2), 264-284.
Miller, K., 2012. Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Mishra, K., Boyton L. & Mishra A. (2014). Driving Employee Engagement: The Expanded Role of Internal Communications. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(2), 183 –202.
Omilion-Hodges, L. M. & Baker, C. R. (2014). Everyday talk and convincing conversations: Utilizing strategic internal communication. Business Horizons, 57(3), 435-445.
Sharma, N. & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2012). Internal corporate communication and its impact on internal branding. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(3), 300-322.
Togna, G. (2014). Does internal communication to generate trust always increase commitment? A study at Micron Technology. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19(1), 64-81.
A healthy flow of upward and downward communication ensures that the communications between managers and employees is complete. For example, in 2010, Kroger surveyed over 200 thousand employees in its “Associate First Tracker survey” and found the feedback both invaluable and “humbling.” Kroger then communicates the findings with their employees who participated which will then generate a new dialog in regard to what the next steps should be (Orgel, 2010). The final channel of communication is the use of horizontal communications between coworkers. This can...
Engagement is also an important part for the employees. The company provides information of the board meetings to all employees. This enhances the employees’ feelings of being well-informed and engaged. The employees even can challenge the current unit wage for manufactured parts. This is an open discussion, so we can see that employees are treated as if they were partners.
Conrad, C. 1994. Strategic Organizational Communication – Toward the Twenty-First Century.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
The employee engagement has become a hot topic of discussion in the corporate world. There is no single accepted definition of engagement or recognised approach for measuring or raising it. HRM Practitioners have involved in quite a lot of study to understand employee engagement and its impact on the performance of the organisation. According to them, employee engagement is a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organisation and its value. An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to improve their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organisation.
The average worker spends two-thousand and eighty hours a year at their place of employment. Communication within the workplace is often overlooked or not given as much importance as most people should allow, given the amount of time that is spent there. Beyond the more basic verbal speech, one must be aware of the nonverbal symbols and noise that can have an effect on communication. There are also cultural, environmental and internal factors that can effect communication and how successful it can be. The various perceptions that an individual has developed over their life can also effect communication. One’s ability to communicate effectively will determine the success and enjoyment that is to come from their job.
Employee engagement, a term devised by Gallup research group, is viewed as an important management tool for any company who wants to be an effective and productive organization. Researches have shown that employee can contribute positively to the organization vision and goal when a company engage them effectively. The employee will also feel more passionate about their work and have a sense of belonging.
Firstly, from a growth aspect, large organizations stopped investing into the future during the economic crisis in 2008 even if they needed to develop and grow. The goal of intrapreneurship is to build the entrepreneurial spirit to support companies’ growth. For example, 27% employees’ absenteeism cause a drop in productivity which translates to a slower growth or even zero growth (Smith 2010). Intrapreneurship therefore helps organizations to grow and expand. Secondly, Innovation is vital for an organization’s achievements, such as new innovations, ideas and products. All the time organizations need to be innovating and must not stop due to any high rates of failure such as 50% to 90%. According to (Smith 2010), organizations need to make innovation success by having the right processes, people, and environment. To be successful in intrapreneurship you need innovation. Finally, from an engagement aspect according to Smith, (2010) between $250 billion and $350 billion annually is costing America’s organizations because of employees lost productivity. Intrapreneurs are engaged in their work when employees feel they are part of the company. This allows the intrapreneur to provide a workplace that is engaging, challenging and meaningful for the workers. The intrapreneur’s passion inspires others to get involved as the employees’ enthusiasm grows, the organization will also develop and grow. Higher levels of employee engagement, more innovation, increase productivity and financial returns what the organizations will achieve if they embrace intrapreneurship. This means if intrapreneurship is chosen it could prove to create successful
In earlier years, organizations relied on traditional forms of communication; they are perhaps considered primitive means on this day. These forms of communication ...
If the organization succeeds then the employees also succeeds. Employees must see the bigger picture and must feel that they are part of the organization and not just a one man show.
Gibson, J.W. & Hodgetts, R. (1991). Organization communication: A Managerial Perspective. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Staying ahead of the competition and increasing profits are the fundamental objectives for every organization. However, many firms today continue to invest extensively in business development activities and less on employee productivity. This mindset ignores the firm’s chief asset and its core foundation, its workforce.
...s in the corporate world by setting new standards to promote and better satisfy their employees. We chose four leading companies in four different industries. The above analysis definitely reveals that perhaps one of the reasons why these companies are the leaders in their industry is because they are well aware of the importance of the work force. They mention in their mission statements as well that yes in deed customers are important but in order to make the customer happy they first need to motivate and satisfy the employee as well. According to Citibank, the general belief is that a happy worker is a motivated and loyal one. So keeping employees' spirits high is a sure-fire way of maintaining a productive workforce. A productive work force would ultimately lead to a healthy organization which would not only promote the society its working for but also itself.
The buzzword in the global HR arena these days is ‘employee engagement’. Its impact has become so immense that is has become somewhat indispensible in the realm of the business world where operational efficiency and profit earning are the sole endeavour of any company. The questions are often asked regarding the utility of the employee engagement policies that are adopted by the companies especially in this world of cutthroat competition. These policies have been extremely useful one hand for the organisations; on the other hand they have been a failed drastically as effective HR and internal communications function in lot of companies.
Communication helps the organizational members to make both personal and organizational goals. And also help them to co-ordinate on the internal activities of the organization. To the extent the less effective communication of any organization is the less e...
An organisation does not exist in a vacuum. It exists in its environment, which provides resources and limitations.