Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of media on a society
Impact of the media on society
Impact of media on a society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. Our media is in the hands of very few large and powerful corporations. What is the cost of this practice? Consider political and economic influences.
In the Beyond Borders textbook on pages 60-74 Michael Parenti’s article “Mass Media: For the Many, by the Few” goes into great detail of the few corporations that control the media and the costs of this practice. Let us first discuss what classifies as media. We have newspapers, magazines, radio, films, television, etc. Television and radio are the most dominated forms of media that are in the hands of four giant networks, which are, ABC, CBS, NBC, and FOX. These media corporations not only own television networks but other forms of media, such as; cable companies, book publishing houses, movie studios, satellite television, etc. Since the broadcast industry has failed to provide adequate regulation policies the competition has decreased, and this has caused a large economic influence. The competition was supposed to lower prices, instead there has been an increase in cable rates and phone rates. In addition, media owners don’t hesitate to exercise control over news content. They frequently kill stories they dislike and in other ways inject their own preferences. In other words, they determine which person, which facts, which version of the facts, and which ideas shall reach the public. The media can also have a political influence. “Progressive candidates are not only competing against well-financed opponents but also against the media’s many frivolous distractions. It is nearly impossible for these candidates to try and run a meaningful campaign because the media will withhold their media coverage .” The few corporations can spin the media any which way. In sum, the media is ne...
... middle of paper ...
...
Works Cited
1. Parenti, Michael. "Mass Media: For the Many, by the Few." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 60-74. Print.
2. International Labour Organization. "Facts on Child Labour." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 396-97. Print.
3. UN Bulletin on the Eradication of Poverty. "World Poverty and Hunger Fact Sheet." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 398-99. Print.
4."Globalization in Everyday Life." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 471-571. Print.
5. Ferree, Myra Marx. "Globalization and Feminism: Opportunities and Obstacles for Activism in the Global Arena." Globalization: The Transformation of Social Worlds. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009. 291-302. Print.
Michael Parenti (2002) declares media in the United States is no longer “free, independent, neutral and objective.” (p. 60). Throughout his statement, Parenti expresses that media is controlled by large corporations, leaving smaller conglomerates unable to compete. The Telecommunications Act, passed in 1996, restricted “a single company to own television stations serving more than one-third of the U.S. public,” but is now overruled by greater corporations. (p. 61). In his opinion, Parenti reveals that media owners do not allow the publishing of stories that are not beneficial and advantageous. Parenti supports his argument very thoroughly by stating how the plutocracy takes control over media in multiple ways: television, magazines, news/radio broadcasting, and other sources.
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
Gardner, Robert, and Wayne Lavold. "Chapter 9-12." Exploring Globalization. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2007. N. pag. Print.
The Globalization Reader. 2011. Fourth Edition. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli, eds. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
It is imperative that people understand the concentration of media ownership also referred to as media consolidation. This term refers to a course of action whereby a few individuals or organizations control an increasing share of the mass media. Research reveals increasing levels of consolidation with many media industries that are already highly dominated by a very small number of organizations. Media consolidation is closely related to issues of editorial liberation, media bias, and freedom of the press (Common Cause 2007), which are usually discussed by those who view it as dangerous to society. This paper will argue that media consolidation via the Internet is disadvantageous to society, and the federal government should not keep the door open for the continuing consolidation of the electronic media. I will dispute this through discussions of the implications and effects of media consolidation on businesses and citizens, through a closer look at some proposed media consolidations of large organizations, and how we might negotiate a difference between the economic freedom of large media businesses, which may be necessary to keep them viable, and the needs of citizens for media access at a fair price.
David. "Mass Media and the Loss of Individuality." Web log post. Gatlog. N.p., 11 Sept. 2007. Web. 10 May 2014.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
... our newspapers, magazines and publishing houses are owned – and manipulated – by gigantic international corporations. Our media is part of the coporatocracy” (p 221).
“Media has been around in America since 1690, when the first newspaper in the United States, Publick Occurrences, Both Foreign and Domestick, was published” ("Milestones …”). Since 1690, media has grown to unforeseen numbers. “There are six corporations in America that own over ninety percent of what we listen, read, and watch, as compared to the fifty companies that controlled the majority of the American news media in 1983. The ‘Big Six’, which consists of: Time Warner, which owns networks like HBO and TNT; Walt Disney, who controls ESPN and the Disney Channel; Viacom, who leads Comedy Central and MTV; News Corporation, which manages Fox and DIRECTV; CBS Corporation the owner of CBS News; and finally NBC Universal, which is in charge of MSNBC and the Weather Channel. These corporations dominate and regulate over seventy percent of what is watched, as opposed to the other three thousand seven hundred plus businesses that control the other thirty percent. In the movie industry, the ‘Big Six’ had box office sales of over seven billion dollars, which doubled the succeeding 140 studio industries” (Lutz, Ashley; "Who Owns The Media…”). It is clear that th...
Many media conglomerates, such as Disney and AOL-Time Warner, have expanded tremendously in recent years with sales and productions. Witnesses to these expansions have begun to raise several questions on whether this growth is becoming a positive or negative development for American media in our society. If corporations continue to flourish in this direction, only a few powerhouse companies will hold complete control over much of the country’s media content. Major issues that would come about due to heading down this route would be the risks of initiating economic monopolies, having consumer prices raise drastically, and the struggle to regulate media bias in our society. From many viewpoints, I find that media consolidations dominating every
Ownership of the media by a small handful of companies has created several problems for democracy since it’s existence. Because the media has been such a major source of information for us Americans we must learn to be skeptical of these large corporations and their motives. Commercialism and the lack of diversity of the media are two such problems that have been created due to these large corporations.
There are many myths and realities about the media, and one of the biggest ones is that the media only exists to make profit. The media will publish anything and everything to make money. The way to make money, however, is getting people to read and believe what is being published. According to the True Activist, around 75% of media is advertising, which means that advertisers dictate and control the media. Advertisers make commercials and photos for their products, and hope that society believes that this product will do what is advertised.
In the United States, there are a few corporations that control the mass media. The Free Expression Policy Project (FEPP), founded in 2000 to provides research and advocacy on free speech, copyright, and media democracy issues indicates: there are ten corporations that control the mass media in the United Stets???: Viacom, Time Warner, Walt Disney, General Electric, News Corporation, and Vivendi Universal. While media concentrations have been going on for quite some time, there are concerns about how this conspiracy of media monopolies started ? In early 1900, telecommunications markets were not monopolies. After the radio was invented, regulations were ...
Child labour is an issue that has plagued society since the earliest of times. Despite measures taken by NGOs as well as the UN, child labour is still a prevalent problem in today’s society. Article 23 of the Convention on the Rights of a Child gives all children the right to be protected from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child 's education, or to be harmful to the child 's health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development.1 Child labour clearly violates this right as well as others found in the UDHR. When we fail to see this issue as a human rights violation children around the world are subjected to hard labour which interferes with education, reinforces
Globalization plays a massive part in my life as it does in everyone’s lives. Every day the world is getting smaller, between technological improvements and peoples interest in these technologies it is easy to see why this is happening. In this essay I have only shortly touch upon some of the places where globalization has affected my everyday life. From shopping as Asda to meeting people on the other side of the world to discuss my dissertation ideas globalization has had a positive affect on my life. The fact that I can walk down a street in Coleraine or Sydney and see similar shops and food outlets is a positive thing in how our lives are intertwined through out the world.