Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime control method
Intelligence led policing to prevent crime
Crime control method
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime control method
Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP) is a method of crime control. It involves the collection of data on “crime and disorder”, (Newburn, T Criminology 2017 p650) which is then analysed. From the knowledge based information, decisions are made, on the best way of tackling crime and prevention, especially with limited resources. ILP fundamental purpose is to focus on known criminals and infiltrate their criminal activities. The police were under pressure to become efficient in the battle against crime, so reinventing themselves and becoming in eyes of the public “value for money” (Radcliffe, J p 26) ILP consists of 4 stages, targeting, gathering, analysis and dissemination. The use of informers in the ILP is fundamental. The audit commission report 1993 main purpose was to analysis/regulate effective policing. What is ILP? …show more content…
The ILP consists of 4 stages.
Firstly, targeting is the beginning of the intel process. Information is gathered on known criminals, by monitoring. The police being proactive rather than reactive are using limited resources wisely, by targeting known criminals on the databases. ILP is impacting on a small number of offenders who commit a disproportionate amount of crime, and not wasting resources on offenders who are not on the database, and you have small chance of catching. This can be seen unfair as unknown offenders are getting away with it. Through ILP the level of crime is effected in a logic and statistical manner and is seen, cost
effective. Targeting issues can be that you are disproportionately targeting certain groups of people(stereotyping), even though there may be a legitimate reason for targeting that certain area, i.e. a drugs ring in that area, but a class of individuals may feel overpoliced and not see that it is the criminals being targeted. Especially if it goes wrong by raiding the wrong address. Targeting should be pertinent and sensitive. Gathering is the collection of information, which can build up intelligence. The 3 sources are, databases, open sources, i.e. HMRC and covert sources (technically or human). Firstly, databases are used to check a variety of information, this could be an individual’s past convictions on the police national computer, or intelligence held by Europol, local or national police. Gathering information can help police understand if the suspect is purchasing goods legitimately or illegitimately, by knowing if employed or on benefits, or if a suspect is dealing drugs and live in authority accommodation, the police can not only arrest the suspect but can also evict from their accommodation. Analysing the background from open sources the police have the upper hand when interviewing with this extra knowledge. The police can request credit card information on where the suspect is spending money and how much and see if this incriminates the suspect. The use of customs and excise can see if a suspect has travelled and can ask the offender for what reason. The convert sources are through tapping of emails, mobile phones or bugging of premises to gain intelligence or through human resources which involves the use of informers or physical surveillance. Analysis is the collection of ‘data on criminals, incidents and trends’ (Interpol.int, 2017) which is then evaluated to form a ‘connection between different crimes in different places’ (Interpol.int, 2017). Analysis is an important part of the ILP process and is pertinently to get it right. The wrong information (wrong name/address) can give wrong intelligence and false intelligence mapping. The raw data can become hard data i.e.
The effective reduction of crime and quality of life abatement is of prime importance in the COMPSTAT model is and is one of the four core principles in the COMPSTAT paradigm. This essay will examine the impact that the implementation of COMPSTAT has had, specifically the process of Data-Driven Problem Identification and Assessment, and model it against the Newark Police Dept., New Jersey, USA. In doing so it will determine what changes in strategy, structure and operations have taken place as a result of the implementation process.
Solutions used to deter and prevent crime in the film End of Watch (Ayer, 2012) focused on police and the duties officers perform while on patrol. In the movie police officers played a central role in the capture of many gang and drug cartel members. This was told through the perspective of officers Brian Taylor and Mike Zavala. Therefore, the solution to crime concentrated on the police involvement, in this case Taylor and Zavala, through their presence, protection, arrests, and investigations. This solution could be generalized and would be possible through the hard work of dedicated police officers.
...Territo, L., & Taylor, R. W. (2012). Intelligence, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. Police administration: structures, processes, and behavior (8th ed., pp. 90-99). Boston: Pearson.
In looking at the Kansas City Patrol Experiment, it appears that adding more police officers has little or no affect on arrests or the crime rate. Please review the study and explain why more police does not mean less crime. Due Date March 11, 2005
By approaching these ideas with solid research goals and planning, researchers have come up with two basic crime fighting strategies that can increase police effectiveness. The first strategy Community Policing, which addresses immedia...
Having been in operation since 1857 it has established substantial patterns and trends of actual crimes reported to the police. It is used to improve crime prevention methods, analyse crime and show police ef...
The purpose of stop and search, an investigative tool to prevent crime is arguably different to the current practice of this procedure, current research suggests that it is used to gain intelligence and for social control (Bowling and Phillip, 2007). Following this, there is substantial evidence suggesting that thirty police forces have no understanding of how to use their powers to complete a stop and search (HMIC, 2013). Furthermore, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (1984, c60) states that a police officer can only stop and search a citizen if they have reasonable grounds to suspect they have stolen or prohibited items on their person. However, statistical evide...
There are four main principles of the compstat process including accurate and timely intelligence, rapid deployment of resources, effective tactics and relentless follow-up. Accurate and timely intelligence is the part of the process that entails obtaining correct data on crime incidents. Essentially officers are required to give a report on crime. This report should be able to inform others office...
Muncie J, Talbot D and Walters R, (2010) ‘interrogating crime’ Crime: Local and Global, William Publishing, (Devon). The Open University. pp. 16 – 17.
...T., Reiner, R. (2012) ‘Policing the Police’ in The Official Handbook of Criminology. Ed. By Maguire, M., Morgan, R., Reiner, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 806- 838
There are different principles that makeup the crime control model. For example, guilt implied, legal controls minimal, system designed to aid police, and Crime fighting is key. However one fundamental principle that has been noted is that ‘the repression of criminal conduct is by far the most important function to be performed by the criminal processes’. (Packer, 1998, p. 4). This is very important, because it gives individuals a sense of safety. Without this claim the public trust within the criminal justice process would be very little. The general belief of the public is that those that are seen as a threat to society, as well as those that fails to conform to society norms and values should be separated from the rest of society, from individuals who choose to participate fully in society. Consequently, the crime control model pro...
Problem-oriented policing presents an alternative approach to policing that has gained attention in recent years among many police agencies. Problem-oriented policing grew out of twenty years of research into police practices, and differs from traditional policing strategies in four significant ways.
We can all agree that an important goal of the American criminal justice system is rehabilitation. It expects that most, if not all, offenders to learn from his or her wrongdoing and become productive members of society (Ballenstedt, 2008). It is this thinking at the heart of a community-based initiative that is designed to bring law enforcement officials together to form a single concerted effort to identify and address patterns of crime, mitigate the underlying conditions that fuel crime, and engage the community as an active partner (Wolf, Prinicples of Problem-Solving Justice, 2007).
Information technology has advanced in multiple ways in society, where organizations has implement the structure into their work environment. Industries have outsource their manufacturing to other places in the world and rely on telecommunication to keep the marketing. The geographic distribution has changed significantly by reducing the distance it takes to complete an operation, due to information technology. These are just a couple of examples of how this advanced technology has reshape our society and continuing.
Approaches to crime prevention have emerged over time and are demonstrated in different solutions, practices, and policies executed by law enforcement, courts, corrections, family, and community. Some of the dominant approaches to crime prevention currently used by law enforcement, courts, corrections, family, and community are: situational crime prevention, crime prevention through social development, crime prevention through environmental design, community crime prevention, reduction of recidivism, and policing. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the dominant approaches used for crime prevention and analyze which approaches are most effective. I will identify and apply at least four approaches used in law enforcement, legislation, courts, corrections, family, and community within the crime prevention programs.