Intelligence In William Golding's The Way Of Thinking

1166 Words3 Pages

Human beings are gifted with one thing that no other creature in this universe is: the ability to think. Thinking is one of the best things we as humans get to experience and share. That being said, I never grokked the concept of thought; how it held so many layers beneath its surface. Through reading different articles about it and its similar concepts, my thought about thought—no pun intended of course— has become more complex, to say the least.
Throughout our course of life, the way we think changes as we go through different points in our lives. This was briefly explained by William Golding in his article, The Way of Thinking. He smartly classified people based on their way of thinking and embodied the three groups in the statuettes found …show more content…

The same goes for Isaac Asimov in his article, What is Intelligence, Anyway? He wrote about how being book smart doesn’t necessarily mean you are smart in all. In this article, Isaac talks about his mechanic and how he challenged him with a very easy but yet tricky question. The mechanic said being too educated can strip you out of your natural instincts and thinking abilities given to you as a human. It can decrease your flexibility in logical aspects of day to day life. One quality of his I admired was, though he thought highly of himself, he was humble enough to admit that he wasn’t good at …show more content…

Some might think that the thinking process comes before the writing process and others might think the reverse. Same goes for William Zinsser, a lifelong journalist and nonfiction writer, and William Stafford, an American poet, and pacifist. In his article—A Way of Writing—Stafford believes that the writing process comes first. He relates the idea with the daily conversations we have with our friends, not needing to plan what we are going to say but still confidently say what we want to say. Same thing can be applied to writing. From his whole article, the sentence “We can’t keep from thinking.” Stood out to me the most. Knowing that something always occurs in our mind is the key to get the ideas flowing. The other idea he had was the willingness to fail. We should trust and forgive ourselves as for everyone has the “luck” and it’s about knowing how to sustainably use the language skill we have. On the other hand, Zinsser believes that the thought process proceeds the writing process. He believes that clear thinking becomes clear writing. One can not exist without the other. The common thing these two writers have is that they both think that the more minimalistic the better. Zinsser believes that clutter is a disease that is spreading through every writer's mind. Eliminating it will cure the society of the word chaos it is in. I appreciated his

Open Document