Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negotiation processes
Distributive and integrative negotiation
Importance of negotiation skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negotiation processes
A company’s negotiation system should be integrated within its organizational culture. Negotiation is a considered as a win-win situations such as those that occur when two different parties are trying to find a mutually acceptable solution to a complex conflict (Lewicki, 2011.pg 6) According to Lewecky there at different types of negotiations where each [party can explain why bone side should get more than other. The distributive negotiation is mostly based on the premise that company’s resources are limited and often times can not distributive equally. Preparation, teaching, modeling and concluding are the main flow process for distributive negotiation. This specific type of negotiation will have a great impact within an organization especially …show more content…
Integrative negotiation has a set of guidelines in order to negotiate. , And the guidelines are The Acronym SHIFT:
- Study position, Interest, and reasons. -Honor other’s possible roles. –Incorporate both interests. - Find Rules of fairness. –Temper the size. (Lecture 6, slide 8,9). Furthermore, the integrative negotiation approach has also key steps that can be combined with the guidelines previously mentioned in order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the problem as well as a more detailed action plan. The key steps are: Identify and define the problem, surface interest and needs. Generate alternative solutions, and evaluate and select alternatives (Lewicki, 2011,
…show more content…
Auto dealers are well known for being experts on negotiation, and they also have the experience to convince costumers to pay for overpriced vehicles. I knew it was a negotiation that was going to take a long time. My idea was not to overpay based on the market value of the car that I wanted to buy. As I approached the place I asked about the model, year, mileage, and price. I decided that since I was so new to the whole thing I was just going to show a very honest, and vulnerable, low-income student who is looking for a fair price. The suggested price was overpriced and after a shocked face he made an offer. An offer counts as an attempt by the speaker to commit himself to perform a future action if the hearer accepts this. Offers are similar to promises, but they differ from the latter in that the commitment to perform the future course of action is always conditional on the hearer’s acceptance (Ihnen, 2016,pg 148). The offer was still overpriced but it was not much, so I decided to established my price based on the argumentation that the amount was my three year saving. The strategies were focused on a distributive negotiation. After a couple of hours he finally settled with my set price. I was relief and amazed on how many arguments or reason you can think of while negotiating. In conclusion, negotiation is a never ending
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
Negotiations are supposed to begin in a positive way in which the negotiators consider the needs and wants of the others involved and their shared interests and interdependencies.... ... middle of paper ... ... References Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practice.
Negotiation is a fundamental process used in resolving conflicts, making business deals, and in managing working relationships with others. Negotiations occur for two reasons: (1) to resolve a problem or dispute between parties, or (2) to create something new that neither party could do on its own.
Integrative bargaining strategies contrast heavily to that of distributive as Integrative involves what is essentially a joint initiative attempting to find a
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
Fontaine and Mr. Gaudin were not effective for what they were trying to accomplish. The style of Fontaine and Gaudin was an integrative bargaining style. The textbook illustrates integrative negotiation as managing “both context, and the process of the negotiation in order to gain the cooperation and commitment of all parties” (Lewicki, Saunders, & Barry, 2011).
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
The topic for my real world negotiation is to come to an agreement with my supervisor for a promotion as well as an increased salary. I currently work as a student assistant at the student services Planning, Enrollment Management, and Student Affairs (PEMSA) department. My goal is to increase my hourly pay from $10.15 to $12.70, a 25% increase. Having worked in this department for three years, I have taken on tasks not part of my job description such as processing return mail, data entry, and supervision.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Conflict is a difference in opinion. The leader must devise ways of dealing with conflict in the team. The focus is to promote a healthy discussion that does not lead to division in the team . The team members come from different department and thus may have differing opinion on tackling the problem. The leader should be able to reconcile the different opinions into one strategy. In such cases, the negotiation skill becomes vital (Harrison, 1971). The leader must negotiate with the team member to strike a balance on the decision. Furthermore, the decision made by the team must be presented to the management and approved. The leader must convince the management that the proposal is viable, and its implementation will be beneficial to the organisation. The ability of the leader to negotiate for resources will enhance the success of the
The negotiation revolved around three main individuals, Terry Hardel, Josephine McNair, and Joe Abernathy. For this negotiation, my partner played the part of Joe while I played Terry. We were both given the same general instructions. However, an additional set of secret instructions were given to each of us separately.
Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris, an entrepreneur, is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanted to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass.
Negotiation has been used as a vital communication tool not only in business but also in social intercourse. It helps people make common agreement and avoid conflict. So we need to use the tactics which we learned from this course and books to do more practice, only in this way we can gain advantages in negotiation.
Sia’s maximum that he would be willing to pay, is $12,000 and Mike’s minimum he would be willing to accept is $10,000. An agreement, if one is reached, will create $2,000 in integrative value compared with no deal, because Sia one-sidedly values the car $2,000 more than does Mike. How that $2,000 is divided between them whether, let 's say, the price agreed to is $10,000, $11,000, or $12,000 is a matter of distributive negotiating: any gain for Sia means pain for Mike, and the other way around. It’s, therefore, fair to describe this as generation of $2,000 in distributive value, distributed in accordance with distributive negotiating skills. On the other hand, what if Mike is an exceptional mechanic and enjoys spelunking in his spare time. Sia, conversely, can’t fix anything, and he hates having to take his car to unfamiliar mechanic shops since he fears that they will take advantage of him. These details propose that more integrative value might be created by the sale of the car if Mike will guarantee to repair any item that breaks for 9 months after the transaction. Let’s assume, for example, that this would cause Sia’s maximum price to increase to $12,500, while Mike minimum price would increase only to $10,200. Any deal that incorporated the repair agreement would be collaborative because it would generate more integrative value than the parties could achieve through the sale of the car alone. The additional $300 can be explained as the value that can be created by the negotiators’ integrative negotiating skills. “In addition, positive emotions make the parties less contentious and more optimistic about the future, which, in turn, increases the chances they will search for multiple alternatives and find a better integrative—win–win—agreement.