Institutional Review Board Pros And Cons

310 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a group of people established to evaluate and monitor all research involving human subject. This group have the authority to approve, require changes to obtain approval and disapprove research. The group review a crucial role to provide perfect protection of human research subject. The primary purpose of IRB is to protect people who participate in the study and to make sure the steps are right. Consent form is one of the important part in the IRB approval to be given to the person who will participate in the study. Also, explain the benefit and risk of the study.

2- In fact it is notorious clinical study. The patients should know the purpose, benefits and risks of the study. The patients had been mislead

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of UCR And NIBRS

    596 Words  | 2 Pages

    Crime data is a resource being used to help understand who the victims are, their age, race, what type of crime they have committed. The more information someone has about crime the more prepared they can be to deal with the victim, evaluate programs that help prevent crime. There are several official sources used UCR, NCVS, NIBRS that are used. There are pros and cons to each source and the following information will include some of the positive and some of the negatives points of each report. This is not inclusive by any means, there are many different various pros and cons of each report.

    Read More

  • Marcia Angell Research Ethics

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    Therefore, he states he wants to “focus the paper on the arguments offered in support of the claim that these trials were unethical,” (302). The first criticism states,” injustice was done to the control group…second, the participants in the trial were coerced into participating…third, the countries in question were exploited,” (302). Against the first criticism, he argues that if the clinical trials were not conducted the participants would not have received proper treatment. For the second criticism, he states that coercion, “involves a threat to put someone below their baseline unless they cooperate with the demands of the person

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of A Civilian Review Board

    1154 Words  | 3 Pages

    Civilian review boards have become an essential in many states dealing with an indecent use of police force. A civilian review board consists of people that are appointed to special boards to review the task of the police deciding whether to incriminate them or withdraw any/ all consequences. The first review board was established in 1950 when 18 organizations created the “Permanent Coordination Committee on Police and Minority Groups” to regulate the police brutality amongst Hispanics and African-American (CRCB History). Three years later New York City took action and created what we know as a Civilian Review Board, however it consisted of three deputy police commissioners that investigated resident complaints. In 1965 Mayor John Lindsay

    Read More

  • The Process of Research: The Institutional Review Board

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    IRBs review all aspects of the researchers' project: the study design, the recruitment process, the participant population, the informed consent document and process, the risk/benefit ratio, privacy and confidentiality, data storage and protection, and safeguards for vulnerable participants (University of St. Francis, n.d.). In this way, participants' rights are protected because the effort is made even before the research begins. The review process ensures that participants are chosen fairly and adequately and the information collected during research is safeguarded through collection, use, and storage. Research using human participants is such an important part of medicine that it is imperative it is performed in a way that its intrigue is not compromised. The Institutional Review Board Process Applying for exempt research study approval from the IRB at the University of St. Francis involves submitting a copy of the work, an application, and a statement explaining why the researcher believes the study would be exempt from expedited or full-level IRB review approval.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Judicial Review

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    as it does supporters. But, if we do not allow the Supreme Court to translate

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Fda

    892 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is a federal agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, one of the United States federal executive departments. The FDA is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the regulation and supervision of food safety, tobacco products, dietary supplements, prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs (medications), vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions, medical devices, electromagnetic radiation emitting devices (ERED), cosmetics, animal foods & feed and veterinary products.

    Read More

  • Managed Health Care Issues

    3218 Words  | 7 Pages

    With the high degree of variations in health care, patients can be under or over treated or even treated with the wrong treatment for their illness. These unwarranted care techniques can be categorized into three different situations. The first category of unwarranted care is the use of evidence or lack thereof, based on other medical care. The way to explain this category is that a care plan for a patient is proven effective without any proof as to why. The example given by Kongstvedt (2007) is the use of beta blockers post heart attack. Beta blockers prove to be effective in nearly one h...

    Read More

  • Is It Ever Ok To Lie To Patients Essay

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    Truth in medicine is a big discussion among many medical professionals about how doctors handle the truth. Truth to a patient can be presented in many ways and different doctors have different ways of handling it. Many often believe that patient’s being fully aware of their health; such as a bad diagnosis, could lead to depression compared to not knowing the diagnosis. In today’s society doctor’s are expected to deliver patient’s the whole truth in order for patients to actively make their own health decisions. Shelly K. Schwartz discusses the truth in her essay, Is It Ever Ok to Lie to Patients?. Schwartz argument is that patients should be told the truth about their health and presented and addressed in a way most comfortable to the patient.

    Read More

  • Informed Consent

    1909 Words  | 4 Pages

    Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering informed consent, the patient must be aware and should be able to give a voluntary consent for the treatment and testing without being coerced, even if coercion is very little. Being coerced into giving consent is not voluntary because others people’s opinions account for part of his decision. Prisoners and the poor population are two areas where coercion is found the most when giving consent. Terminally ill patients also give consent in hope of recovering from their illness. Although the possibilities are slim of having a successful recovery, they proceed with the research with the expectation of having a positive outcome. As stated by Raab, “informed consent process flows naturally from the ‘partnership’ between physician and patient” (Raab). Despite the fact that informed consent is supposed to educate the patients, it is now more of an avoidance of liability for physicians (Raab). Although the physician provides adequate information to his patient, how can he ensure that his patient properly ...

    Read More

  • Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... be in the patient’s best interest and getting the best results for the trial.

    Read More

  • Genetic Cloning

    1547 Words  | 4 Pages

    In conclusion, all three of these practices offer the opportunity for great medical advancement but struggle with ethical issues and possible risks as well as questions of their viablity as legitimate treatments to benefit medical problems.

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues In Tuskegee Studies

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    Researchers failed to take precautions to protect the subjects from harm and to promote their

    Read More

  • Immunizations Cause Autism

    1305 Words  | 3 Pages

    discovered that the article described false evidence. It is crucial to trust the medical claim that

    Read More

  • Informed Consent Essay

    1386 Words  | 3 Pages

    Informed consent is a very serious decision a patient has to make when it comes to their health and consenting to procedures that are believed to cure or treat their current health status. It is important to address the effectiveness of the role a physician play in the informed consent process assuring that the patient has given truly informed consent and what safeguards can be put in place to assure the patient is exercising informed consent. Informed consent is based on the fact that the person consenting is a rational individual that is aware of the action to which he/she is consenting. Allen and McNamara (2011) notes that "On the standard understanding, the important elements of informed consent are the provision of information, the voluntariness of the choice and the competence of the chooser to make the choice— so the potential research participant should be provided with information relevant to the decision to participate, they should be able to choose freely about their participation and they should be competent to decide.

    Read More

  • Clinical Trials are the Gateway to Medical Treatment

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...f patients’ doctors recruited participants, patients may not ease to refuse participating a trial. Therefore recruitment may be better to be done by a person who does not normally treat the patients.

    Read More

More about Institutional Review Board Pros And Cons

Open Document