Insanity Vs. Unnatural In Shakespeare's Hamlet

243 Words1 Page

Reynaldo is attempting to find out about Laertes naturally, indirectly asking people around Paris about him.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were acting unnaturally when conversing with Hamlet; and while claiming they were there to see him, Hamlet sensed something suspicious, and a result, confronted them on the matter, and consequently learned that they were sent to see him by the King and Queen.

Hamlet plans on trying to get Claudius to confess to the murder of his father by having the actors do a play involving murder, in an attempt to get Claudius to confess, naturally rather than if Hamlet had burst through the palace doors in a fit and demand that Claudius had killed his father. If, however, Claudius did admit to the murder of King Hamlet, it would’ve been unnatural since Claudius would’ve felt pressured into confessing. Toward the conclusion of Act II, Hamlet is quoted as saying “…I have heard that guilty creatures sitting at a play have, by the very cunning of the scene, been struck so to the soul that presently they have proclaimed their malfunctions”, reassuring the idea that the play could guilt Claudius into confessing the murder of Hamlet’s father. …show more content…

Unnatural also ties into Sanity vs. Insanity because an insane person wouldn’t be able to act naturally. An example of this can be shown when Hamlet introduces his antic disposition, going from both sane and natural to suddenly being insane and

Open Document