'Innovation Imperative: Change Everything'

587 Words2 Pages

Education is an important aspect in order to have a successful career. In the past few months, many students across the nation have engaged in a new learning alternative instead of the traditional public school system: online schooling. According to Glenn Reynolds’ article, Consider alternative schooling, online school is convenient for students. In contrast, the article, Innovation Imperative: Change Everything by Clayton Christensen and Michael Horn states that online schooling isn’t affordable for every student. There has been a growing number of students using online school programs who claim that it is a better way to learn. Although online schooling is a great alternative, I strongly disagree that online schooling is more beneficial for …show more content…

Author Reynolds believes that students should consider switching to online schooling. He describes online schooling as “a way of escaping the often-poor instructional quality and questionable discipline of public schools … of escaping the rigidities they bring” (1). This author makes the assumption that all traditional schools aren’t meeting up to educational standards. However, most traditional schools are actually high quality in content, with well-trained teachers and effective learning systems. Since Reynolds makes this assumption, it detracts the reader from his main point and strengthens the opposing argument. In response, authors of the article “Innovation Imperative: Change Everything” believe that students are better off in a traditional public school setting. These authors state, “as concepts and skills are taught more effectively online, it’s unlikely that face-to-face interaction will cease to matter” (1). Christensen and Horn clearly demonstrate that social interaction between a student and their teacher is essential for learning. This facet gives public schools an advantage. I profoundly agree with their statement because in-class interaction enhances my own social skills and opens up to new thinking. The authors show that an online education experience will never relatively equate to a traditional public school experience. These points make Christensen and Horn’s argument more compelling and

Open Document