More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on lord of the flies by William golding
The lords of flies by William Golding essay
Summary of Lord of the Flies by William Golding
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“That was murder,” (Golding 156). Survival. As humans, we gravitate towards perceiving ourselves as superior to most other animals. Are we really though? What happens when we are pulled away from the technology filled society and placed into the wild, barely enough to live off of? Will we look out for people in the same situation, having to go out every day and wonder if they will make it through until sundown? These were some of the many events that happened in the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding. In this book, by using tone, imagery, and setting, Golding showed how when innocence was lost, it could not be regained.
The setting surprisingly enough, was a good example of how innocence was slowly, but surely lost, the characters not
…show more content…
only changing themselves, but also their surroundings. The once fresh and new island, glistening with both beauty and mystery, was dimmed, the reader thinking that the boys being the primary influence on this. “Color drained from trees and pink surfaces of rock, and the white brown clouds brooded,” (Golding 145) allowing the reader to imagine the life that had been so fresh at the beginning, slipping away, falling deep into a bottomless pit. The boys were driven out of sanity at times approaching the final moments on the island. Dealing with the constant reminder that they were stuck, and had been stuck since what seemed to them, as an eternity of time. The scar, the last piece of society that they are left with, being the last memory of what was once a normal life at the time. It was a visual representation of the events that had happened “the undergrowth at the side of the scar was shaken and a multitude of raindrops fell pattering,” (Golding 1). The island was enough for them to survive, but at the same time had little aspects that gave the boys the push they needed for their ethical judgement to shift into something that they didn’t know they had in them.` Golding uses a variety of ways for reader’s to receive his overall tone of disgust towards the alternate side of the human race. He uses Piggy to portray sensible thinking in this book, and although Piggy’s thoughts are very reasonable, as soon as the boys see him as unathletic because of his appearance and asthma, he is immediately rejected, and the boys’ primitive thinking takes over, having the outsiders who wouldn’t join them killed. As Piggy tries to talk some sense into the boys, “what are we? Humans? Or animals? What’s grown ups going to think?”, the author shows a disapproval to how they make the choice to use the other boys as slaves (Golding 79). In the end of the book, as the boys increase in violence, they grow farther and farther away from the innocent individuals that they once were. On another side of the author’s tone, “Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man's heart, and the fall through the air of the true, wise friend called Piggy,” presents a wistful tone, the author sympathizing for Ralph’s realization of his loss of innocence (Golding 202). Lastly, Golding used imagery to show the contrast between innocence and the loss of it.
There was a drastic change in attitude towards certain individuals when they started turning to Jack’s violent ways. Ralph, once respected, became ignored, and treated as if his ways of survival were lesser to Jack’s. Always seeming to be nagging the other boys, Ralph experienced exclusion rather suddenly. Golding managed to paint a picture of this sudden change, showing the reactions to the modifications to Ralph’s original plans that Jack had made. “That was why the place looked so different. Normally the underside of the green roof was lit by a tangle of green reflections, and their faces were lit upside down,” shows Ralph noticing the difference in the boys’ views on him (Golding 77). Golding also used imagery to describe the sorrow in which followed with the loss of innocence. “Softly, surrounded by a fringe of inquisitive bright creatures, itself a silver shape beneath the steadfast constellations, Simon’s dead body moved out toward the open sea,” paints a picture in which Simon, an individual who had a deeper understanding than everyone else of what was going on, was killed because he was thought to be the beast, just moments after his death, lonely, no one caring for the wise little boy, who understood mankind better than pretty much everyone else on the island (Golding 154). The boys, having walked off fully aware of the deed that had just been done, walked off to kill another being. To kill such a boy, who had done nothing but be kind and help out, had made innocence
extinct. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a picture was painted of the distinction between innocence present and the loss of it. The boys, who beforehand, the thought of taking a being’s life had never crossed their mind. In this book, by using tone, imagery, and setting, Golding showed how when innocence was lost, it could not be regained. Even though at the end they recognized what they had done, the innocence lost, was still lost, and the lives that they took would forever be gone, only them knowing what went on during their stay at coral island.
the novel, Lord Of The Flies by William Golding, the idea of cruelty is shown through many brutal actions that the characters find pleasurable.
Ralph is the novel’s protagonist and tries to maintain the sense of civility and order as the boys run wild. Ralph represents the good in mankind by treating and caring for all equally, which is completely opposite of Jack’s savage nature. Jack is the antagonist in the novel and provokes the most internal evil of all the boys. Jack is seen at first as a great and innocent leader but he becomes t...
1961, Stanley Milgram conducts an experiment on participating adult males utilizing the power of authority and electric shocks to examine two common underlying principles in humanity: blind obedience to authority and the fear of the repercussions of contravening. Similar to the focus of this study, the dreading of consequences and trusting higher authority are the basis of the plot in The Lord of the Flies, where William Golding depicts a large group of boys (aged twelve and under) stranded on a desolate island that are left to configure their own law and order. The essence of this novel is clear; the blind trust of authority in societal situations, which will tarnish the conditions of a person’s life, and the
Shortly after the boys’ rough arrival at the unknown island, Ralph blows a conch to summon all the boys for a meeting. Ralph reminds them that they must all work together and collectively to be able to create a good society. But as time passes by, without the education of adults, the boys, especially the younger ones, begin to lose their instinct to be civil. The younger boys, instead of working together and hard to re-create the society they have lost, they begin to follow their instinctive drift to be savage and play around. “That little ’un that had a mark on his face–where is–he now? I tell you I don’t see him.” The boys looked at each other fearfully, unbelieving. “–where is he now?” Ralph muttered the reply as if in shame. “Perhaps he went back to the, the–”Beneath them, on ...
Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies the major theme shown throughout is innocence. For the duration of the novel the young boys progress from innocent, well behaved children longing fir rescue to bloodthirsty savages who eventually lose desire to return to civilisation. The painted bloodthirsty savages towards the end of the novel, who have tortured and killed animals and even their friends are a far cry from the sincere children portrayed at the beginning of the novel. Golding portrays this loss of innocence as a result of their naturally increasing opened to the innate evil that exists within all human beings. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! . . . You knew, didn’t you? I’m par...
It’s one of the most famous stories to ever exist, the story of how two people changed what defines us as humans. It’s the story of Adam, Eve, a serpent, and the unbecoming of mankind, the Fall of Man. This iconic account has been the premise for many works over the centuries. Today, Lord of the Flies by William Golding is considered one of the most influential novels of our time, not only for its adventurous story of stranded boys on a lost island, but also because of its allegorical tale of the true fault in man’s soul. William Golding leans heavily upon the Biblical account of the Fall of Man to highlight man’s depravity in his novel, Lord of the Flies.
“Earth is abundant with plentiful resources. Our practice of rationing resources through monetary control is no longer relevant and is counter-productive to our survival.” - Jacque Fresco. Lord of The Flies explores how a group of boys ultimately become savage after trying to ration resources. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a group of English boys are shot down while on a plane that crash lands onto an Island during World War II, where without any adults must survive on their own. They must overcome themselves and figure out how maintain a successful society. Through characterization and symbolism, William Golding asserts that man is innately savage and must be controlled through a civilized society.
What would happen if a group of children were set free without adult supervision? Set in World War Two, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies depicts a group of British schoolboys that are left stranded on an island after their plane is shot down during the battle. While no adults are left to supervise them, their poor decisions lead to horrifying outcomes as Roger, Piggy, Samneric, Ralph and Jack continue to fight with each other over the most effective way of survival and their inner savage self. Throughout the book, the boys’ loss of innocence can be seen through Roger’s actions towards others, Jack’s changed view towards violence, and the tribe’s overall change in morality.
As Ralph is trying to hide from them overnight, he wonders, “Might it not be possible to walk boldly into the fort… pretend they were still boys, schoolboys who had said, ‘Sir, yes, sir’- and worn caps? Daylight might have answered yes; but darkness and the horrors of death said no” (186). No matter how hard Ralph tries, he cannot discard his new knowledge of Jack and his tribe’s potential for evil and corruption. For a long time Ralph seems to be in denial; like many others, he seems to want to stay true to his belief in the overall goodness of the human heart. Ralph’s expectations for human kindness are finally challenged to the point of irreversibility when Jack attacks him and tries to pursue him on a vicious manhunt. When Ralph collapses on the beach and a naval officer arrives, “With filthy body, matted hair, and unwiped nose, Ralph wept for the end of innocence, [and] the darkness of man’s heart...” (202). One might think it strange that rather than rejoicing over rescue, Ralph and the rest of the boys cry out in grief. The young schoolboys come to understand the enormity of human greed and evil, and unfortunately it is a lesson that they will not be able to ignore or forget. They witness and play a role in their own loss of innocence, and the time they spend on the island teaches them what
Circumstance and time can alter or determine the different paths a group of young boys will take. These paths can have the power to strip children of their own innocence. Such a statement can be explored in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as it ventures into the pros and cons of human nature. William Golding’s tale begins with a group of English school boys who crash land on a deserted tropical island during World War II. In Lord of the Flies, the island that the boys crash on is beautiful, glamorous, and magnificent; yet, it proves to become a dystopia by the horror of the cruelty, violence, and inhumanity.
Jack only cares about hunting and having fun. Hunting and having fun are two human instincts that everyone has. This attracts many boys to his tribe, but after a short period of time, the boys descend into savagery because they do not have the social stability that Ralph creates at his tribe. Ralph often grows impatient with Jack because all Jack cares about is hunting. Jack becomes so focused on killing a pig that it is all he can talk about. Ralph and Jack are having a conversation about building shelters when Jack completely misinterprets what Ralph is saying and thinks he is talking about killing a pig. Ralph says to Jack, “‘I was talking about smoke! Don’t you want to be rescued? All you can talk about is pig, pig, pig!’ ‘But we want meat!’” This quote clearly deciphers that Jack cannot even focus on a simple
“I think that’s the real loss of innocence: the first time you glimpse the boundaries that will limit your potential” (Steve Toltz). In the previous quote, Steve Toltz discusses the transition from innocence to corruption. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies illustrates the loss of innocence through various characters: Jack, who struggles with pride and a thirst for power; Roger, who revels in the pain of others and uses fear to control the boys; Simon, who represents the demise of purity when humans are at their most savage; Ralph, who illustrates the struggle people endure when attempting to be civilized near the savage; and Piggy, who suffers because he has the only technology necessary to survive. Golding enforces the theory that true innocence will often pay the price to sustain true evil by arranging the characters' personalities and actions in a way that correlates to the effects of Darwin's evolution theory, "survival of the fittest" (). Jack is a good example of this as he exerts power over the weak and uses his skills in hunting to survive. The thirst to prove his masculinity overrides his innate purity, effectively corrupting him. Jack’s loss of innocence begins a domino effect that begins to influence the others.
What I found most interesting about The Lord of the Flies was the William Golding’s decision to use male children as the main characters. He easily could have written the same book with male adults, but he decided to use young children to explore human nature, even what we consider the most innocent human nature, that of a child. It would make far more sense to most authors to use grown men on the island. After all, it would almost be expected in our culture that adults would revert to some sort of primal nature when stranded on an island together. Adults in our society are considered to be world-worn, battle scarred beings. Adults are thought to have lost their innocent, child-like thoughts somewhere along the way when the real world came crashing upon their shoulders. Children, however, are the peak of innocence.
Without authority and rules man will slowly lose their innocence to be able to survive. Throughout Lord of the Flies William Golding evaluates how if you leave children alone without rules innocence will be replaced with violence. In Lord of the Flies, Golding examines the loss of innocence in man. This exploration is seen in the characters including Jack, Ralph and the hunter’s throughout the novel and shows the violence created from these characters losing their innocence.
1. Coast Guard leadership has been called to action in response to the ever increasing presence of individual destructive behavior throughout the Coast Guard. The following correspondence outlines the framework of my strategic plan. a. Action: Revitalize our organization’s commitment to producing young Coast Guardsmen and women who are exemplary citizens and who will act honorably and intelligently, whatever their situation or level of responsibilities. Honor, Respect, and Devotion to Duty are not just words; they frame the way we live and act.