Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The US civil rights movement
Civil rights movement in the usa
The US civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
An Ignorant Incrimination Most disputes, especially political ones, center around one idea: whether following the precepts of the past or looking to the future is best for a society. In the mid-1900s, Charles Darwin looked toward the future with his own ideas about the world and brought the longstanding argument to the forefront. Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s Inherit the Wind portray how a small town’s myopic view and ignorant attitude displaced it from the world and resulted in a freethinking man’s incrimination. The provincial town’s unawareness of the world around it and condescending nature kept the town at a standstill that imprisoned a man “because he speaks what he thinks” (Lawrence 47). When Mr. Drummond arrived, the townspeople shouted, “It’s the Devil!” (Lawrence 27). Judging Drummond strictly based off of his appearance proves just how closed-minded these seemingly “accepting” Christians were. The sinful mannerisms blinded the people of Hillsboro so much that they refused to believe any modern propositions. For example, Brady refused to listen to any scientist that Drummond wanted to utilize as a witness (Lawrence 53). Furthermore, it was the town’s unheeding of the rest of the …show more content…
Every day the townspeople participated in some type of religious activity, and Mr. Brady stated, “The Bible satisfies me. It is enough” (Lawrence 58). Again and again, the play used the word “enough”, and no one, excluding Cates and Drummond, ever reached for more. Even the sermons were the same and the worshippers “[had] familiar responses” to Reverend Brown’s words like the sermon was some type of well-choreographed dance number (Lawrence 41). By acting out the same homilies never yearning for change, Hillsboro’s people denied the town of change and Bert Cates of his
In Charles Darwin’s life he had helped make a significant advancement in the way mankind viewed the world. With his observations, he played a part in shifting the model of evolution into his peers’ minds. Darwin’s theory on natural selection impacted the areas of science and religion because it questioned and challenged the Bible; and anything that challenged the Bible in Darwin’s era was sure to create contention with the church. Members of the Church took offense to Darwin’s Origins of Species because it unswervingly contradicted the teachings of the book of Genesis in the Bible. (Zhao, 2009) Natural selection changed the way people thought. Where the Bible teaches that “all organisms have been in an unchanging state since the great flood, and that everything twas molded in God’s will.” (Zhao, 2009) Darwin’s geological journey to the Galapagos Islands is where he was first able to get the observations he needed to prove how various species change over t...
Everyone has a great amount of power and influence to change society’s perspective by taking action. In the play, Inherit the Wind, Bert’s trial gained more attention than expected. The trial itself isn’t just about Bert teaching evolution, but the perspective on freedom of religion, and the separation of church
E.K. Hornbeck through his language in “Inherit the Wind” (1955) tries to show the town of Hillsboro the way that their thoughts are harmful and wrong. Hornbeck backs that up by using a sarcastic tone to show them how ridiculous they are being, by using metaphors and similies to give the citizens context from the outside world that they might not always consider due to their closed mindedness, and by using syntax to prove that he is better than them and making himself and his views credible. His purpose is to get the town to change their viewpoint so they can see that they need to move forward with the time. He establishes a superior relationship with his audience of small town people with narrow viewpoints who need to learn to be more accepting.
Starkey, Marion L. The Devil In Massachusetts: A Modern Inquiry Into The Salem Witch Trials. London: Robert Hale Limited.
I had been in the village for all but a week when I realized there was something... wrong. There seemed to be an underlying atmosphere of fear and animosity. Of course, with my wide-eyed, innocent thinking at the time, I assumed the presence of Satan had damaged the townspeople 's trust of one another. Again, I blissfully accepted this, and I was wrong.
Hysteria took over the town and caused them to believe that their neighbors were practicing witchcraft. If there was a wind storm and a fence was knocked down, people believed that their neighbors used witchcraft to do it. Everyone from ordinary people to the governor’s wife was accused of witchcraft. Even a pregnant woman and the most perfect puritan woman were accused. No one in the small town was safe.
Salem in the 1600s was a textbook example of an extremist society with sexist norms and no separation of church and state. Because it had no laws, only people considered authorities on law, it was always a society based on norms laid down by the first settlers and severity on the verge of madness. The power was imbalanced, focused subjectively in the people who had means to control others. Some people attempted to right the wrongs of the powerful, as people are wont to do eventually. Because of them, change indeed came to Salem, slowly and after excessive ruin and death. Before the rebels’ impact took hold, Salem’s Puritan society was a religious dystopian disaster, a fact illustrated excellently by Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible. This religious dystopian disaster carried many flaws and conflicts that can be seen in other societies, both historical and modern.
...ene illustrates. Through the process of developing Brady's character, Kramer questions whether it is possible for religion to exist in politics. Brady can't balance the two, as his ultimate collapse illustrates. Kramer also points out the detrimental, oppressive affect that a small town can have on the truth. The narrow mindedness of the town enabled Brady to take control and prevent any alternative point of view to be considered. Is it possible for a small town to equally consider both sides of an argument? Brady appears to the town as a very strong self-assured man who believes in his ideas. At the climax of the film, Drummond places Brady on the stand, and questions his ideas. This serves as a major theme for the film and as a result it becomes necessary to have a strong development of Brady's character, so that the viewer can better understand his fall.
“Nothing strengthens authority as much as silence” (Leonardo Da-Vince). In Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, there were several problems that led to the downfall and corruption in the town of Salem. The biggest problem was with Reverend Paris and how much he struggled with his authority in the town as a man of god. The reader must understand that although Reverend Paris is supposed to be a man of god he abuses his power to control the church, protect his reputation, and focus too much on material possessions.
The play, set in the 1600’s during the witch hunt that sought to rid villages of presumed followers and bidders of the devil is a parallel story to the situation in the US in the 1950’s: McCarthyism, seeking the riddance of communist ideologists. Miller sets this story more particularly in a village called Salem, where the theocratic power governed by strict puritan rules require the people to be strong believers and forbid them to sin at risk of ending up in hell. However, the audience notices that despite this strong superficial belief in God, faith is not what truly motivates them, but it is rather money and reputation.
The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.
Hawthorne recognizes how structured the Puritan society andis discusses how one’s sins and actions can affect their standing in society. The main element of the novel, Hester’s scarlet letter, greatly attests to how sin alone can change your entire societal position. After receiving her letter, Hester “quote about living outside town” and is ostracized by the small community. Even the children begin to put Hester down, chanting awful things such as “let us fling mud at her”. TNothing about Hester has changed, she still works as a seamstress, the sole reason she moves to the bottom rung of the social ladder is due to her sins in a very religious society. On the opposite side of the spectrum lies Dimmesdale. As the local minister, Dimmesdale wields a lot of power in the town, but he is placed upon a pedestal as a prominent figure because the townspeople believe he is so pure. Even when Dimmesdale confesses that he has sinned, the townspeople only revere him more and believe that they are the ones who have sinned and are unholy. By the end of the book, Dimmesdale has inadvertently gathered enough support because people revere him that many doubted if heDimmesdale had sinned at all or “insert examples of how people think he died”. In a society dominated by religion, ministers, by their very nature, are
In “The Time Machine” by H.G. Wells, the author portrays, for the most part, that the choices humans make now cannot drastically change the outcomes in the far future. The obvious representation of social and political classes, even as the time traveler goes 800,000 years into the future, describes this more. The fact that, even 800,000 years later, there are still apparent classes that can determine an individual’s worth guides the reader towards the conclusion that even if an individual were to change the present, it would be impossible to avoid the very same mistake from being repeated in the future.
This all changes when he is faced with evil and sin for the first time. Much lie “The Crucible”, the story’s climax is when the man goes into the woods to witness and join in a satanic dance much like Abigail did in “The Crucible”. What this man doesn't realize, is that many people from his town are there too, in which he is stunned by seeing so many people who lived in a “perfect” town commit a sin. By seeing so many people in the forest, committing a sin, the man realizes that no-one is perfect. Both of these stories demonstrate that people are not perfect and will never be. The problem with being “a city on a hill” is that, people will never be perfect therefore, creating this dream town and perfect city is
...t is my contention that the application of the theory of natural selection to society and humanity is relatively unimportant, when compared with the application of the theory to evolution. Hawthorne's "The Birthmark" was a very timely interpretation of the events surrounding the emergence of the theory of natural selection. It shows the reader that the academic debate between Darwin and Gamble has a human face, and that all of us can learn from Aylmer's mistake, and Aminadab's nobility.