Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Blackfish movie analysis
Orcas in captivity pros
Orcas in captivity pros
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Blackfish movie analysis
Blackfish A documentary is an informative film that aims to position readers to accept one version of the events or topics expressed. All documentaries posses the ability biased and present an altered version of reality to persuade audience positioning. ‘Blackfish’ is a captivating and inspired documentary released in 2013 concerning the inhumane captivity and domestication of Orcas at SeaWorld for pecuniary advantage. The film, directed by Gabriella Cowperthwaite positions viewers to adopt a dominant reading position on the topic of whale subjugation. The documentary utilises techniques such as expert verification, emotive language and the humanisation of whales to position dominant viewers to accept the ideology that captivity is deleterious …show more content…
to the mental state of whales. Through the consolidation or former trainer interviews and expert opinion, the documentary supports the ideology that the captivity or Orcas leads to depleted mental health.
The verification of the information that is communicated through the documentary by the former trainers acts as expert opinion and persuades dominant viewers to connect with the films point of view. Jeffrey Ventre tells the audience “This is a multi-billion-dollar corporation that makes its money through the exploitation of Orcas and trainers” (Blackfish, 2013). To a dominant viewer, this quote signifies that the only justification for SeaWorld’s captivity of Orcas is for monetary purpose and that they have no compassion for the whales. This quote can be further verified by the John Hargrove novel, Beneath the Surface: Killer whales, SeaWorld and the truth behind Blackfish. Hargrove states ‘Since water work was now proscribed by OSHA, the company explained, trainers weren’t swimming with whales anymore and shouldn’t be paid extra.” This statement summarises to viewers of a dominant reading position that SeaWorld only paid their trainers ‘extra’ to perform water work and since that was now prohibited due to safety risks, the wages were dramatically decreased. If SeaWorld really cared about their staff, the wages wouldn’t be cut because of a small decrease in park revenue when the job still has …show more content…
risk. Emotive language is another key technique used to convince viewers to take a dominant viewpoint of the documentary.
Compelling language selection throughout the narrative pressures readers into believing phrases and comments made, presenting all information as the truth. Perhaps one of the most persuasive quotes in ‘Blackfish’, Lori Marino, the resident neuroscientist explains, “All whales in captivity have a bad life. They’re all emotionally destroyed, they’re all psychologically traumatised. So, they are all ticking time bombs.” This quote dynamically enforces readers to believe Lori’s ideology that all whales have the ability to take a life. Due to Marino’s title as neuroscientist, dominant viewers will credit the assertion and doctrine of the scientist. Another inflammatory phrase from the text that ensures dominant viewers to believe the philosophy that Orca captivity is psychologically scarring to Orcas is, “You’ve got animals from different cultural subsets that have been brought in from various parks. These are different nations. These aren’t just two different killer whales. These animals- they got different genes. They’ve got different languages.” (‘Blackfish’, 2013) This persuasive quote encourages a dominant audience to see that even though the whales are advertised as a family, they do not hold the same culture or languages and it isn’t okay for parks to mix the different breeds of Orcas when in the wild, the different regions don’t collide. The strong emotive
language connects dominant viewers to the text to believe in the ‘Blackfish’ philosophy. A major aspect in connecting dominant viewers to the documentary is the humanisation of the Orcas. Throughout the entirety of the text, various quotations personify the killer whales to bring about a deeper understanding for dominant viewers. In the first part of the film, John Jett, former trainer at SeaWorld states, “When you look into their eyes you know someone is home.” This indicates that whales have a human like emotion system and that Orcas have a ‘soul’ that can be seen through their eyes. Dominant viewers accept that whales do have complex emotions and agree with John Jett’s ideas. Through the use of expert opinion, emotive language and the humanisation of whales, the 2013 documentary ‘Blackish’ successfully informs viewers to take a dominant reading position and accept the ideology that whale captivity is inhumane and destructive to the psychological well-being of killer whales. For dominant viewers of ‘Blackfish’ the bias in the film leads to the accepting of the information set forth. This proves the statement that all documentaries have the potential to be biased and can represent one version of reality.
Since whales are normally peaceful in the wild and they only seem to attack while in captivity, the argument is that captivity is wrong and dangerous for killer whales. This argument is supported by detailed facts about how the whales are tortured and agitated by other whales with no outlet. Both female and male whales are confined to a swimming pool where they are in a way being forced to try and mate. The female whales tend to abuse the male whales, which leads the whales to become mentally and physically unhealthy resulting in attacks on trainer. In the interviews with Corinne Cowell and Nadine Kallen, they mentioned that when they visited Sealand of the Pacific that three whales were confined to a “dingy pool”. Another appeal to pathos is when a neurologist that has studied killer whales mentions how the animals are very intelligent and are well-aware of what is going on around them. (SeaWorld) Killer whales have similar brains to humans, but have a bigger part of their brain where emotions are processed. With this, whales are more aware of their emotions and the bonds they make with humans and other animals. (SeaWorld) With the huge amount of raw footage, first-hand accounts, and true information, the film is able to grasp the attention of the viewers with the amount of emotion that is shown from the former trainers and the whales themselves. With these tactics, the film effectively appeals to the
The documentary Blackfish by Gabriela Cowperthwaite is a gripping documentary about orca whales in captivity at SeaWorld and other sea parks around the world that shows the disturbing effects that can be caused from having these animals in a place where they shouldn’t be.
The captivity of large, wild animals is accepted for theme parks all around the world. Tickets are sold for people to come and watch these animals live and even preform in an exhibit that almost resembles their natural environment. It is impossible for parks and zoos that use animals as attractions to provide the same resources and space they would have in the habitat they are usually found in. They can, however, help injured or ill animals that cannot survive in the wild. This is where I believe they should draw the line for keeping animals in captivity. SeaWorld has gotten a lot of attention in the last few years, especially since the Netflix documentary, Blackfish, was released. This film targets the company for the mistreatment of their orca whales. In particular, it told the story of one named Tilikum and shows the problems he and the other orca whales face while living under the care of SeaWorld. Gabriela Cowperthwaite, the director
Cowperthwaite uses pathos to grab her audience’s attention, but not to a point where they are enraged; she uses just the right amount to persuade them that the animals at SeaWorld are in terrible living conditions and are treated
Millions of people come from across the world to visit Seaworld every day without thinking about the lives of the animals behind the scenes. Why would they have concerns? From Seaworld’s commercials to the website, they convince the general public that Seaworld is the place to go to see the happy sea animals perform. If Seaworld is such an ecstatic place, what excuse does Tilikum, their greatest well known orca whale, have for the three attacks on trainers? The documentary “Blackfish” was created by the director Gabriela Cowperthwaite because she questioned herself after realizing Tilikum's odd behavior over time in captivity, and if there was any indisputable parts to animal captivity?
John Crowe, one of the hunters, is interviewed and tells the story of “the worst thing he’s ever done”. He appeals to the appalled emotions of the audience by admitting to the inhumane way they captured the baby whales. He uses an analogy when discussing the capturing, claiming it was like “kidnapping a kid from its mother”, which pulls at the heartstrings of any parent watching the film, establishing a sense of relatability. The film uses juxtaposition by examining how Crowe, a tough looking man, can be brought to tears by this horrific act. Blackfish then moves to discussing the reason behind Tilikum’s outburst by running a montage of news reports ambushing SeaWorld on the inhumane treatment of whales. The use of the rhetorical question “If you were in a bathtub for 25 years don’t you think you’d get a little irritated, aggravated, maybe a little psychotic?”, grabs the audience’s attention by creating a scenario they can understand. These events create an accusing tone that convinces the audience that SeaWorld is the antagonist of the film. Along with accusations from reporters, SeaWorld has fought many lawsuits against OSHA- the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, due to the way SeaWorld treats their animals. A court hearing is held regarding Tilikum’s behaviour due to pulled video footage of Tilikum lunging towards one of the trainers
...e feel the emotion of pain for these animals and feel how sad it truly is. They also find out the real facts about what happens to both the killer whales and the lobsters. Though not the same thing is happening to both these animals, many members of the audience feel the same way towards them both. Both of these both use real facts to pull their readers/viewers in, knowing that everything they’re saying must be true. Cowperthwaite and Wallace make you feel like you can trust them throughout their whole stories. They make you understand how they feel and gain the audience’s faith from the beginning.
This report aims to make light of certain elements of documentary making that are perhaps more susceptible to influence on the director’s part, and once again explore the effect of these decisions on the audience’s reaction to the information presented.
“Blackfish” has had people thinking about the tragic events happening at SeaWorld and the reasons behind it. SeaWorld tried to cover up the deaths of trainers but, there are always people that find out the truth. The trainers who
Blackfish is a 2013 documentary attempting to elevate public awareness regarding the orca that are being kept in maritime amusement parks, specifically SeaWorld, and the inherent danger of their captivity. The film is effective because it raises a set of important ethical questions for the viewer while presenting with a necessary fact-based style of documentation that does not evoke gratuitous scenes of abuse in order to inspire sympathy, unlike some of the other films that are intended to raise awareness about animal abuse.
In the article “A change of heart about animals” author Jeremy Rifkin uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade humanity in a desperate attempt to at the very least have empathy for “our fellow creatures” on account of the numerous research done in pursuit of animal rights. Rifkin explains here that animals are more like us than we imagined, that we are not the only creatures that experience complex emotions, and that we are not the only ones who deserve empathy.
"Blackfish" might not make an airtight case against training wild animals for our enjoyment, but it very convincingly argues that those animals remain what they are, no matter how SeaWorld or any other corporation invested in presenting them as cuddly attractions tries to say otherwise.
David Attenborough’s The Life of Mammals: Meat Eaters and Steve Irwin’s Africa’s Deadliest Snakes are wildlife documentaries that have similar but different purposes. Attenborough uses a script that is rehearsed and the natural environment is followed, Irwin does not have a script and the animals are disturbed. However, both hosts inform the audience of the animal and how they function. Attenborough achieves this through the use of language and Irwin achieves this by being the presenter. Purpose, audience, context, language and form will be compared between the two texts.
Millions of people visit Sea World each year (The Fate). They crowd into Shamu Stadium to be entertained by the killer whales as they perform. Their eyes widen, and they sit in awe, as these enormous creatures effortlessly propel themselves out of the water. The children in the audience squeal with delight as the orca’s giant tail sends a wave of ice water over the crowd. But these fast-paced, high-spirited shows hide a darker reality. They are designed to mask the reality of the bare, cold concrete walls that the Orcas are forced to call home. It’s time for people to realize the plight of these mammals. Keeping Orcas in captivity is both harmful and cruel.
David Attenborough’s The Life of Mammals: Meat Eaters and Steve Irwin’s Africa’s Deadliest Snakes are wildlife documentaries that have similar yet different purposes. Attenborough’s has a script that is rehearsed and the natural environment is followed. Irwin’s does not have a script and the animals are picked up. However, both hosts inform the audience of the animal and how they function. Attenborough achieves this through the use of language and Irwin achieves this by being a presenter. Purpose, audience, context, language and form will be compared between the two texts.