Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the industrial revolution on other countries
Industrial revolution and european imperialism continuities
International effects of the industrial revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, Europe went through two industrial revolutions. These revolutions were, in part, dependent on raw material coming from both Europe itself and its colonies. Before the Second Industrial Revolution, Europe was unable to conquer Africa, but with new military technology and medicinal discoveries, it became possible for these countries to gain territory in Africa. This time also brought with it new ideas like social darwinism and the idea of “survival of the fittest”. European countries obtained colonies in Africa to strengthen themselves, to provide for themselves, and because they believed it was their right or duty as “superior races”. Europe was motivated to acquire colonies in Africa in order to strengthen …show more content…
In 1888, Joseph Chamberlain gave a speech saying that Britain would starve without the food provided by its colonies. By saying this, he shows that colonies were also founded natural resources. The purpose of his speech was to justify the conquest of Africa by saying it helped British people, which also proves that. In 1900, the German Social Democratic Party Congress said that the purpose of colonies was “capitalist exploitation” of the foreign markets. Although money isn’t necessarily a natural resource, it’s still a resource that Europe was striving to gain from Africa. The point of view of the GSDP congress was that countries engaged in conquest were greedy, which further proves the fact that Europe was there for economic gain. Industrialization feeds off of natural resources, so when Europe couldn’t provide them for itself, it had to go looking …show more content…
In 1900, Lord Roseberry sent a letter to the London Times stating that strong nations had a right to conquer other countries.This is the exact ideology of social darwinism. The use of the phrase “survival of the fittest” is a direct reference to the work of Herbert Spencer, who was a social darwinist that took Charles Darwin’s scientific theory and applied it to society. The fact that Roseberry truly believed that the “fittest” would survive shows his belief in this ideology. In 1919, Henri Merlin stated that civilised races have the right to conquer “barbarous” races, and that when they did, it was their duty to aid those inferior races. This is also the exact beliefs of social darwinists. European countries believed that conquering Africa was not only their right, but their
The Industrial Revolution began in England during the late 1700s, and by the end of its era, had created an enormous amount of both positive and negative effects on the world in social, economic, and even political ways. The revolution began to spread across the world, raising the standard of life for the populations in both Europe and North America throughout the 1800s. However, even with all of its obvious benefits, its downsides are nonnegotiable, forcing workers into horrendous living and working conditions, all inside of unkempt cities. While some might argue that Industrialization had primarily positive consequences for society because of the railroad system, it was actually a negative thing for society. Industrialization’s
The factory whistle blows right in the middle of your favorite dream. You wake up in a startle as you glance at the clock. 5:30 am. You rush to get out of bed, seeing that you have to get to work in 30 minutes. You splash some water on your face, brush your teeth, put on some fine factory clothes, pull your hair back, grab an apple and run as fast as a gazelle. The Industrial Revolution had both positive and negatives on the lives of adults and children during that time period.
Throughout the 19th century, European Imperialism had a major effect on Africa. As countries expanded in terms of wealth, resources, and innovation, more territory and workers were needed. The first solution to solve these problems was to begin colonizing in Africa. The driving force for imperialism in Europe and Africa was mainly economical. This economical approach was established through many ways including cultural and nationalistic ideas.
The Industrial Revolution was an era between 1780 and 1850 where new inventions and machinery flourished, replacing human labor with machines in the production and manufacturing of goods. The Cottage Industry helped give rise to the Industrial Revolution with its inventions such as the flying shuttle, spinning jenny, water frame, and spinning mule, all of which were mainly operated by women. This opened new opportunities for women in the working industry but this also introduced working class injustices, gender exploitation, and standard-of-living issues. Women 's experiences in factories reflected the profound social changes of the revolution and continuities with traditional working-class ways of life through their poor working conditions, demoralization, and little reward for their hard work.
The impact of the Industrial Revolution was a positive experience for some, but it was a great difficulty for others. Because of the demands for reform and protection for workers arose, government and unions began to take place. That was how the evils of the Industrial Revolution addressed in England in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Africa is a land of riches like no other, so as expected, European countries would have some sort of desire to conquer properties in whatever way they did. As stated in African Colonies and their Exports Chart, countless of natural resources are found in different areas in Africa. Not only does the data show plenty of resources, but also a variety (Doc D). This confirms that Africa is a wealthy land that Europeans grew fond of and hoped to take over. Specified in Imports and Exports Graph, following the 1900’s, after the conference to divide up Africa was held, Britain decided to use Africa’s natural resources and specialize in many industries. The imports doubled from 4 million pounds, while the exports boosted from 2.5 million all the way to 21 million pounds (Doc. E). With this lucrative increase in trading and selling, it is fair to conclude that not only were resources a factor of beginning imperialism in Africa, but also a successful result.
The results of European colonialism shows that the aim of colonialism is to exploit the human and economic resources of an area to benefit the colonizing nation. As a result, the nation that is colonized is affected negatively. In reality, how Europe really affected Africa as a whole is much
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting a land grab on the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economic, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation. Europe in this period was a world of competing countries. Britain had a global empire to lead, France had competition with Britain for wealth and so did other nations like Germany and Russia.
America had a huge industrial revolution in the late 1800”s. Many changes happened to our great nation, which factored into this. The evidence clearly shows that advancements in new technology, a large wave of immigrants into our country and new views of our government, helped to promote America’s huge industrial growth from the period of 1860-1900.
Everyone is aware that the Industrial Revolution occurred during the 1830’s and has been more or less consistent since then. However, it seems the issues and the problems between then and now have shifted in a direction that is both beneficial yet harmful. In the 1830’s, the conditions were atrocious but manageable for most people, meaning that they were not deadly and were worth it, which allows for improvement. Also, for the 1830’s, things were packed very tightly on the factory floor and child labor laws were non-existent. In contrast, today, there are many cases of lack of benefits, poor quality of life, improper safety training, and gender and race discrimination. However, there are many intriguing and grand ideas that are deep within
Before the Europeans began the New Imperialism in Africa, very little was known about the inner parts of the continent. However, after some explorers delved deeper into the heart of Africa, the Europeans soon realized how economically important this area was, and how much they could profit from it. At the time, Britain had only small occupations of land in Africa, but after they realized that they could make money from the rich resources from the inner regions of Africa, they wanted to invade the African countries and take over. This led to the scramble and ultimately, the partition of Africa. During the Age of Imperialism, from 1870-1914, Britain was a major country, which proved to be true in the “carving up” and division of Africa. Britain was one of the strongest of the European countries, and had the power to take over much of the most valuable lands with the most rich and abundant supplies of raw materials and other resources. There were five main reasons for their imperialism. They were political and military interests, humanitarian and religious goals, ideological, exploratory, and lastly, but most importantly, economic interests.
Africa has had a long and tumultuous road of colonization and decolonization; the rush to colonize Africa started in the 17th century with the discovery of the vast amounts of gold, diamonds, and rubber, with colonization hitting a fever pitch during World War I. However, the repercussions of colonization have left deep wounds that still remain unhealed in the 21st century. Early on, European nations such as Britain, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Germany and Belgium scrambled for territories. Countries wanted land so they could harvest the resources, increase trade, and gain power.
The Scramble for Africa, named for the speed at which Africa was partitioned and colonized, began with King Leopold II 's conquest of the Congo. However, it did not end with the Belgian occupation of the Congo. Just as Leopold 's Congo was demarcated by the vast extraction of raw materials, most notably rubber, other European powers used African colonies as resource markets. However, economic motivations were not the sole stimulus for colonial expansion into Africa during the late 19th century. The causalities of the Scramble for Africa, and subsequent partition, are the result of a complex interplay between social, political, and economic forces both within Africa and within Europe. The colonization of Africa could not have been as extensive
The Scramble for Africa is one of the best examples of colonization in world history. Europe alone managed to colonize the entire African continent in a period of roughly twenty five years, spanning from 1875 to 1900. The quest for power by European nations was only one of the driving forces for this race for colonization. The geographical location and the natural resources to be exploited in certain regions of the continent were important factors in the race for land. Another factor that contributed to the colonization of Africa was the end of the slave trade. The need for new capitalism to exist between Europe and Africa after the call for the abolition of slavery became great. European traders were searching for new avenues for making money, as well as new ways to exploit of the natives of Africa, due to their perceived weakness as a people, made the quest for occupation relentless by European nations. Political, economical and social ambitions all led Europe to partition Africa into separate colonies and the race to see what country could establish a monopoly in Africa became a European obsession.
The “scramble for Africa” many may call it. This push for amplification and extension has allowed historians to decipher the underlying impacts and revisions it has caused on the course of these mass continents. This imperialistic mindset Europeans had and the sense of “white man’s burden” were seen in the actions taken when taking the small African countries. The effects of European Colonialism in Africa had great impact that shaped the life and history of African people as well as the European imperialist. These European countries imposed on the African tribes yet created commercial growth, bureaucratic policies and social advancements towards better living in the process.