Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of creation myths
Comparison of creation myths
Comparison of creation myths
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of creation myths
The Egyptians maintained elaborate stories and descriptions in their buildings leaving behind texts that expose the convictions of the time. From the Pyramid Age, the Pyramid Text was carved on walls and sarcophagi. Later they would form the foundation for the Coffin Texts and Book of the Dead. Turning toward the Indus culture, the interpretation methods can be complicated because the Indus civilization’s original script has yet to be deciphered. However, the Vedic-Aryans handed down orally the Veda that consists of poetry regarding various deities, ritual instructions, and explanations of those rituals. Creation The need to explain the origins of existence and creation is fundamental to faith and critical to the practitioner. To the Egyptians the universe was a massive swirling disorder of undistinguishable waters called “Nun.” A primary myth describes the appearance of a mound called the “benben” which was the prototype for pyramids. The god Atum appeared on the mound and created the first deities. In one account, the god Nofertum emerged from a water lily coming out of the disorder. Other myths existed offering differing creation explanations for mankind and deities. Interestingly the Egyptians saw no conflict in this mix of stories. …show more content…
Vedic-Aryan texts also contain multiple creation stories and, as with the Egyptians, some of them are inconsistent yet were accepted. The description is comparable to the Egyptians, a complete darkness and unknown chaos. In one account, the universe was nothing. The divine incarnation of Brahmă known as Prajapati emerges, like the Egyptian god Horus, from a lotus bloom floating on the primordial waters and created such things as deities, men, day, and night. Both stories have a mysterious beginning essence, Nun in Egypt and the Self-Existent Being as described in the Laws of Manu. The two systems contain similarities in the pre-creation explanation of chaos and water, life created by a single entity, and emergence of beings. Good and Evil Gods The Egyptians and the Indus-Aryan saw all nature and life as a constant and eternal dualistic struggle. Both shared a perception that the world is in an eternal conflict of good and evil with the need to appease both the good and bad gods. Recorded from Egypt’s 4th Dynasty (c. 2613–2494 BC) there was a complex polytheistic system with pantheons, chief gods, and “enneads” or gods who existed in animal-headed-human, human, and animal forms. In these texts are found battles between Horus and the Evil-One (Seth) representing the conflict of light and darkness. Aryan hymns in the Rigveda were also deeply rooted in polytheism. They tell of eternal cosmic war between deities of light (Divas) and darkness (Asuras). The similarities continue in the form of common gods and stories.
One of the more interesting is that of Egyptian goddess Hathor and the god Ra who had to restrain her as she rejoiced in slaughtering the enemies of Ra. In the comparable Indus-Aryan story, the goddess Kali was stopped by her spouse Shiva in order to spare the remnant of their enemies. Many of the gods in each culture bear common characteristics. For example, the Indus sun god Surya, like the Egyptian Ra, had three forms. The Egyptian red demon Seth closely resembled the red demon Rakshasa. Addtionally, In an Indus creation myth Prajápati weeps creative tears like the Egyptian sun-god Ra, whose rays are tears from which all things
spring. Journey to the Afterlife In both Egyptian and Vedic-Aryan cultures there exists a concept of eternity and an afterlife. While modern Hinduism derives much of its teaching from Vedic-Aryan thinking, the concept of reincarnation not found in the Veda. The doctrines included in Vedic-Aryan culture point to a heavenly afterlife and required a constant system of sacrifices on earth to “feed” the ancestor who resided in heaven. The Egyptian afterlife consisted of a journey through a complex underworld, transected by a mighty river, containing lakes of fire and snake infested deserts. In the Indus-Aryan version, each person travels a personal path protected by packs of dogs, going through a series of dangers while threatened by various demons. Contradictions While similarity is found between the Egyptian and Indus-Aryan’s religious beliefs, there are also contrasts. The most notable difference was the Pyramids of Egypt. In these massive tombs were the mummies of the ruling pharaohs. This ritual was based on the story of the god Osiris who was murdered and dismembered by his brother Seth. Osiris’s wife, Isis reassembled him by binding him together with linen wrappings. Later this practice expanded when the pharaohs demanded embalming courtiers to help in the afterlife. Eventually even the poorest citizens could have a process of pickling in a bath of natron. Turning to the Indus-Aryan’s, they preferred cremation sending the dead “to the world of those who have done good deeds.” Their building focused on well-structured cities and roads to support trade and commerce. Furthermore, the Egyptian Pharaoh was considered a “Man-God” interceding with the gods on behalf of humanity. The Indus-Aryan’s leader was regarded as a king from royal lineage who kept the armed corps in a permanent state of readiness and supervised royal horse sacrifices.
Creation stories have profound effects on humans. Those associated with ancient cultures/civilizations aim to ensure the successful survival or well-being of themselves and that particular culture/civilization of their association, but not all are beneficial, prosperous, or fortunate. Mesopotamia’s “The Gilgamesh Epic”, Egypt’s “Hymn to the Nile-Documents”, and Mesoamerica’s Mayan and Aztec creation stories/religion are influential to establishing significant relationships within society, whether that is between humans and nature or humans and their “god(s).”
Have you ever wonder how the universe was created? Some people believe in the Earth creation by the Supreme Being, some believe in the scientific explanation of Big Bang explosion theory. Every civilization in the world has its own story of how things are created. Each story reflects how people see and think the world at their time. In this essay, I am going to compare two myths of how man was created – the creation tale of Mohawk Tribe and the Hebrew Bible creation story. There are a lot of similarities as well as differences between these legends. While some differences between the two tales are the development of the stories and the meaning behind the stories, the similarities between them is the concept of creationism.
Creation texts and most early pieces of literature all share many of the same themes, mythology, and to an extent, the same characters. In the days that early texts like The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Bible, and Popol Vuh, epistemology was of high interest to many philosophers and writers. To answer the questions of “How did we get here,” “Why are we here,” “What do we do here,” and other ontological ponderings, texts like these were written to give some reason. One consistent theme from early literature and creation texts is that early people had the tragic flaw of a thirst for knowledge and a lack of willpower, which is shown in The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Bible, and Popol Vuh.
The symbolic world views of how the world was created can be described through the cosmogonies of Genesis and the Laws of Manu. It is through these theories that one can learn how the universe came into existence. Many individuals consider a certain religion to be their ultimate realm of reality, and it is within religion that these symbolic world views come into play. The cosmogony of Genesis began along a sacred history of time where god created merely by speaking. In contrast, the Laws of Manu involve creation through thought. In Genesis, there is only one god and in Laws of Manu there is more than one god. Both cosmogonies have many similarities as they have many differences, yet both of them are significant in understanding and interpreting the philosophy of religion and its traditions. Although god believes that everything he created is good, I believe that the existence of god is questionable when there is so much evil in the universe.
Hesiod’s Theogony and the Babylonian Enuma Elish are both myths that begin as creation myths, explaining how the universe and, later on, humans came to be. These types of myths exist in every culture and, while the account of creation in Hesiod’s Theogony and the Enuma Elish share many similarities, the two myths differ in many ways as well. Both myths begin creation from where the universe is a formless state, from which the primordial gods emerge. The idea of the earth and sky beginning as one and then being separated is also expressed in both myths.
Myths – as they are known to most of the world – give insight into the pasts of various countries and religions as the people saw them. They have been used to explain phenomenons in nature or describe the tales of courageous and important men and women throughout history. Creation myths in particular define how the Earth itself was created, along with the universe, heavens, hell, people, and creatures that exist today. Genesis of Christian mythology, for instance, tells the story of how the single deity God spoke and formed everything from day and night to man and woman. Various African creation myths, such as with the Yoruba, explain the creation of the Earth through at least a couple gods working together and all life sprouting from a seed. But all share a common themes, such as a form of chaos or nothingness before life is created. Joseph Campbell notes that “... the idea of an absolute ontological distinction between God and man – or between gods and men, divinity and nature - first became an important social and psychological force in the near East, specifically Akkad, in the period of the first Semetic Kings, c. 2500 B.C.,” showing another similar trait – a god or set of gods exists to create in each story (626). Joseph Campbell makes a comparison of how both Genesis and the Book of the Dead of Egypt share the same idea of their bodies belonging to their god in some way, or being reabsorbed into them at death (630-631). Others, like the Japanese and Iroquois creation myths, claim the Earth was once covered entirely of water before land was formed. Adam and Eve of Genesis and Izanagi and sister Izanami of Shintoism provide examples of myths that share both a passive and active pair of people who eventually create the Earth's population. In any case, certain popular creation myths, some closely tied to prominent religions, share more common characteristics than others. An entire sub-study, called comparative mythology, gives insight into this subject.
Throughout recorded history, man has sought explanations for the various phenomena that occur in every facet of nature, and when no obvious answer is forthcoming, still a theory is often proposed. These explanatory theories, often taking the form of stories or chronicles, are usually linked to some sort of mysticism or divine intervention. By ascribing that which he does not understand to the gods’ will at work, man avoids facing up to his own lack of knowledge in a given area, and also draws comfort from assuming that the universe does indeed function under the guidance of divine beings. Thus the explanatory accounts that man crafts enhance his own security, quelling the fear of chaos that resides in everyone, and also providing a convenient means of constructing a religion based on such stories.
In this paper I will discuss three similarities and four differences between Enuma Elish-The Epic of Creation (King,1902) and Genesis 1:1-3:24 as described by Michael Fishbane (Fishbane, 1979). These writings are selected to describe the story of creation of the earth and the inhabitants of the earth. However, each author has a very different view and way of explaining what they have interpreted the sacred texts to mean.
Ancient Egyptians tried to understand their place in the universe. This is why their mythology is centered on nature such as the earth, sky, moon, sun, stars, and the Nile River. There are many Egyptian myths of creation, but the Heliopolitan Tradition, Hermopolitan Ogdoad, and the Memphite Theology are the most commonly used. They all have some common elements and gods. For example, many of t...
The questions about the existence of life and the creation of the world are always mind-boggling and fascinating, however, the real answer to these questions may never surface. All there is to rely on are the myths, stories and legends passed on from generation to generation by ancestors and the clues they have left. This essay will try to uncover the ancient Mesopotamian and Hebrew views on existence and creation by looking at sources like the Genesis and other ancient Mesopotamian texts and poems. Mesopotamians and Hebrews had contrasting views on how they explained the events in their lives, and through analysis of ancient sources, those differences will be outlined. In such populated and booming areas, human conflict was inevitable and some of the law codes that were placed in effect to establish order within the society will be examined. Throughout it all, god and religion played a central role in these ancient civilizations.
Every ancient society and civilization has creation myths that were passed down and keep alive throughout the passing of time by word of mouth. These myths are the world’s oldest stories and are vital to these cultures because they explain their beginnings and give purpose to their existence. By analyzing and interpreting different creation myths it becomes easier to understand different cultures and their connections and relationships with heir beliefs and god(s).
Different religions view the idea of how the world was created, or cosmogony, in different ways. China holds many cosmogonies, but they all revolve around the same ideas. Egypt’s cosmogony was motivated by the desire that their God created all other gods. The views of people define the cosmogony in Greece, mostly of Homer. Cosmogony in the Hebrew religion is defined in the first two chapters of Genesis(Brandon 208). Japanese cosmogonic mythology has its beginnings of myths that one can trace way back. Some views of the different religions remain the same, but most views differ from each other.
The ancient Egyptian ideology of the creator and vessel stems from the gendered metaphor of humankind’s creation.
There have been many prosperous civilizations throughout the history of the world. Many of them became very large, and lasted for a countless number of years. The most successful and large scale civilization, however, was that of Ancient Egypt. Although it lies in the middle of the largest desert in the world, egyptians were able to use their intelligence to utilize the Nile River and cultivate the surrounding land for farming. They came up with very unique conceptual ideas that benefitted them greatly, and discovered many new things that would impact society around the world to this day. For all of these reasons and many more, Ancient Egypt was the most advanced civilization of its time.
While the Hebrews and Egyptians creation theories bear resemblances and differences, the study and comparison of both the Egyptian myths and the biblical account allow us to comprehend the religious views of ancient civilizations in a better light. One may come to the conclusion that the Hebrews were influenced by the cultures of Egyptians by creating similarities in their own beliefs, or by drawing a line of defense of what is in their terms true, by separating from the mass ideals of the Egyptians and establishing distinct