Individuals That Contributed To The Civil War
The Civil War was brought about by many important
people, some that wanted to preserve and some that wanted
to eradicate the primary cause of the war, slavery. There
were the political giants, such as Abraham Lincoln, and
Stephen Douglas. There were seditious abolitionists such
as John Brown, escaped slaves such as Dred Scott, and
abolitionist writers like Harriet Beecher Stowe. These
were the people who, ultimately, brought a beginning to the
end of what Lincoln called “a moral, a social, and a
political wrong”(Oates 66).
Southern states, including the 11 states that formed
the Confederacy, depended on slavery to support their
economy. Southerners used slave labor to produce crops,
especially cotton. Although slavery was illegal in the
Northern states, only a small proportion of Northerners
actively opposed it. The main debate between the North and
the South on the eve of the war was whether slavery should
be permitted in the Western territories recently acquired
during the Mexican war, which included New Mexico, part of
California, and Utah. “Opponents of slavery were concerned
about its expansion, in part because they did not want to
compete against slave labor”(Oates 15).
In 1851, a literary event startled the country.
Harriet Beecher Stowe, an American writer and abolitionist,
wrote an antislavery novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, that was
published serially in a newspaper and in book form in 1852.
“It was a forceful indictment of slavery and one of the
most powerful novels of its kind in American literature.
The success of the book was unprecedented, selling 500,000
copies in the United States alone within five years, and it
was translated into more than 20 foreign languages”(Oates
29). It was widely read in the States and abroad, and
moved many to join the cause of abolition. The South
indignantly denied this indictment of slavery. “Stowe’s
book increased partisan feeling over slavery and
intensified sectional differences. It did much to solidify
militant antislavery attitude in the North, and therefore
was an important factor in the start of the American Civil
War”(Oates 31).
In 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act,
which created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, and
stated that each territory could be admitted as a state
“with...
... middle of paper ...
...
Instead they joined the lower South with the secession of
Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee. This
secession by the South lead to the opening to the American
Civil War.
The war over slavery was brought about by many
important people, who used many different ways to express
their points of view. Some exhibited their dissatisfaction
with slavery by debating, some by using violence, some by
suing in court, and some by writing a story. These were
all effective strikes against the South, and primary causes
of the war. In conclusion, these people ultimately brought
a beginning to the end of what Lincoln called, “a moral, a
social, and a political wrong”(Oates 66).
Bibliography
Bradford, Ned. Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Appleton-Century Inc., New York. 1956.
Oates, Stephen B. The Whirlwind of War. Harper Collins Publishers, New York. 1998.
Woodworth, Steven E. Davis and Lee at War. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 1995.
“Emancipation Proclamation”. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/Lincoln/emancipate. html
“Jefferson Davis to Congress of the Confederate States”. http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~pjdavis/620225.html
Weigley, Russel F. History of the United States Army. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1st Edition, 1984.
For the beginning, in the middle and in the ending of the Civil War in the United States, the Black Americans were central as soldier and civilian. At first, people tried hard to get around this fact. Even President Abraham Lincoln administration sent Black volunteers home with an understanding that the war was a ''White man's war". The policy was eventually changed not because of humanitarianism but because of the Confederation's battlefield brilliance. The South brought the North to a realization that it was in a real brawl that it needed all the weapons it could lay hands on.
On the topic of environmental impacts due to “industrial farming”, Bill McKibben and Blake Hurst share completely different perspectives. McKibben believes that industrial farming has simply left an unexcusable bad impact on the environment, saying that it is unethical and that the meat we eat is potentially killing our environment and us as well. McKibben states that “we should simply stop eating factory-farmed meat, and the effects on climate change would be one of the many benefits.” (page 201). McKibben addresses that the techno fixes brought in industrial farming are simply not enough to help our environment.
African Americans helped shape the Civil War from various perspectives. Actually, they were the underlying foundation for the war if you think about it in depth. African Americans were slaves and had been dealt with like property since they arrived in America. The likelihood of opportunity for these slaves created an enormous commotion in the South. The issue of equal rights for African Americans brought on a gap between the states. The United States Civil War began as an effort to save the Union, and ended in a fight to abolish slavery. The Civil War, frequently known as the War Between the States in the United States, which was a Civil War battled from 1861 to 1865, after seven Southern slave states proclaimed their severance and framed the Confederate States of the United States. More Americans died in the Civil War than in World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War combined. Two thirds of the individuals that were killed in the Civil War died of disease. The medical world at the time of the Civil War and advanced disinfectants, did not exist which could have enormously lessen the spread of disease and illnesses. After years of bloody combat that left over 600,000 soldier’s dead and destroyed much of the South's infrastructure, the Confederacy collapsed, slavery was abolished, & the difficult Reconstruction process of restoring national unity and guaranteeing rights to the freed slaves began. By December 1865 the 13th Amendment had abolished slavery throughout the United States (Waldstreicher).
Leahy, Stephen M. "The Historical Battle over Dispatching American Troops." USA Today (Farmingdale). July 1999: 10-12. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 07 May. 2014.
African Americans were very questionable at first in the Civil War. The Union Navy had been already been accepting African American volunteers. Frederick Douglass thought that the military would help the African Americans have equal rights if they fought with them. Many children helped in the Civil War also, no matter how old they were. Because the African Americans were unfavorable, black units were not used in combat as they might have been. Nevertheless, the African Americans fought in numerous battles. African Americans fought gallantly. Northern leaders also saw another reason to have African Americans in the Civil War is that the Union needed soldiers. Congress aloud them to enlist them because they thought they might as well have more soldiers.
Mental retardation or suspects with low intelligence quotients (IQ) are easily manipulated by police comments and interrogation tactics. Those suspects usually do not understand the law or the consequences of a confession. They may want to please the police officer by being accommodating or agreeable. They may just wa...
There has been considerable debate worldwide, regarding the accuracy of eyewitness testimony in the criminal justice system. Particularly, arguments have surrounded wrongful convictions that have resulted from incorrect eyewitness evidence (Areh, 2011; Howitt, 2012; Nelson, Laney, Bowman-Fowler, Knowles, Davis & Loftus, 2011). The purpose of this essay is to consider psychological research about the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and its placement in the criminal justice system. Firstly, this essay will define how eyewitnesses and their testimonies are used within the criminal justice system and the current debate surrounding its usage. Secondly, the impact of post-identification feedback will be used to show the affect on the confidence of a witness. Thirdly, studies around gender related differences will show how a witnesses gender can affect memory recall and accuracy. Fourthly, empirical studies will be used to highlight how a psychological experience called change blindness can cause mistakes in eyewitness identification. Finally, the effect of cross-examination will be used to explore the impact on eyewitness accuracy. It will be argued, that eyewitness testimony is not accurate and highly subjective, therefore, the criminal justice system must reduce the impact that eyewitness testimony is allowed to have. Developing better policies and procedures to avoid wrongful convictions by misled judges and jury members can do this.
One of the most persistent stereotypes of (dis)Abled individuals is that they are evil or villainous and as such are predisposed to criminality due to some type impairment. Nothing is farthest from the truth.. Although, people with intellectual disorders and mental health issues are a growing population within the criminal justice system, they are still more often than not victims of crime as a result of their circumstances. People with developmental and cognitive impairments or significant mental health issues in many cases lack impulse control or display inappropriate emotions that the criminal justice system may misinterpret, thus bringing criminal charges for such offenses as causing a disturbance or mischief. When the police are confronted with a situation that involves a cognitively impaired or mentally ill person the police do not know how to respond in an appropriate manner. This image is seen throughout the media over the past few years. One has to look at the tragic death of Sammy Yatim or Michael Eligon to see these image.
Every day a child is called on to testify in a courtroom. Children who have to testify in open court are easily influenced by outside sources. This paper will show the reasons children should not be used as witnesses in a courtroom. I will show all the different influences that a child receives and prove them uncredible. The interview process can influence a child greatly. Ceci and Bruck (1995) found a study that shows that child witnesses may be questioned up to12 times during the course of an investigation. The questioning process can take up to a year and a half to be completed. Children are not capable of remembering exact details for that period. Their answers to questions will change each time he or she is asked. This is because they do not retain information in the same way as an adult. Most studies have shown that children start to lose their ability to recall an event accurately only 10 days after the original event has happened. Another factor in a child’s ability to recall an event is stress. A child can go into a shock stage and repress all memories of what has happened to them. These memories may not resurface for many years. This affects a child’s ability to identify the suspect in photo and live line-ups. The amount of stress a child goes through affects their ability to answer questions in an interview, if they cannot remember what has happened, how are they supposed to answer the myriad of questions the interviewer will ask them.
Another interesting fact about Lake Baikal is that more than 1,700 species of animals and plants live in the body of water. Of the 1,700 species, approximately two-thirds of those animals are unique to Lake Baikal. In other words, nearly sixty-six percent of Lake Baikal’s animals cannot be found in any other body of water in the world (Saving Lake Baikal). Species found in Lake Baikal include arctic grayling, Baikal sturgeon, and freshwater seal. Due to the huge selection and uniqueness of species in the lake many people do not know of or do not see numerous species that exist in our world. 1,700 different species in one lake is...
Human beings are confronted with numerous issues throughout his or her lifetime that would require him or her to examine the best action to take to avoid the damaging consequences. In most cases, individuals restrain his or her action to take into consideration the consequences that may lead to the right or wrong behavior. One’s ethical and moral standards are first learned at an early age from his or her culture, how he or she is raised, religious background, and social system. Scientifically, there are various ethical theories, such as the virtue theory, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism (Boylan, 2009). By understanding these theories one can compare, contrast and uncover the reasoning behind his or her ethical and moral standards.
O’Neill, William L. World War II A Student Companion. 1 ed. William H. Chafe. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
...is increased to a total of 19 when the researchers presented them with a concrete example (what their name is). The data shows how there is a correlation between IQ score and ability to be a witness and understanding the truth. Prescreening victims and also incorporating an understanding of the truth and knowing the difference in the truth and a lie should be something that is implemented in some of the programs that assist the intellectually disabled. The study also noted that there is currently no program that includes any training in relation to the law. So there is a possibility that we can increase their knowledge and expose individuals with intellectual disabilities to courses that help them understand what a truth and lie are and hopefully reduce the amount of false memories and misinformation that these individuals are exposed to and may come across.
Poultry is by far the number one meat consumed in America; it is versatile, relatively inexpensive compared to other meats, and most importantly it can be found in every grocery store through out the United States. All of those factors are made possible because of factory farming. Factory farming is the reason why consumers are able to purchase low-priced poultry in their local supermarket and also the reason why chickens and other animals are being seen as profit rather than living, breathing beings. So what is exactly is factory farming? According to Ben Macintyre, a writer and columnist of The Times, a British newspaper and a former chicken farm worker, he summed up the goal of any factory farm “... to produce the maximum quantity of edible meat, as fast and as cheaply as possible, regardless of quality, cruelty or hygiene” ( Macintyre, 2009). Factory farmers do not care about the safety of the consumers nor the safety of the chicken, all the industrial farmers have in mind are how fast they can turn a baby chick into a slaughter size chicken and how to make their chicken big and plumped. Factory farming is not only a health hazard to the well-being of the animals, but the environment, and human beings ;thus free range and sustainable farming need to be put into practice.