Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative effects of inclusive education
Positive and negative effects of inclusive education
Positive and negative effects of inclusive education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative effects of inclusive education
According to Salvia, J., Ysseldyke J. E., & Witmier, S., (2017), individuated educational program, least restrictive environment, protection in evaluation procedures, and due process are all key legal components under IDEA that must be considered when assessments on students are being carried out. An individualized Education Program (IEP) is a legal document that describes the services that are to be provided to students with disabilities who qualify for special education services. Those detailed services are based upon the findings of the child’s assessment results. A multidisciplinary team performs a comprehensive assessment of the child through various tests, interviews, and observations, and the information collected from those findings …show more content…
is evaluated and organized to set the foundation for the types of services each disable child will need over a period of time. A list of long and short-term goals and objectives are developed and complied into an instructional program for the child. The program must detail how and when progress towards accomplishment of the goals and objectives will be monitored and evaluated. In addition, the multidisciplinary team must include parents in the process of setting up the child’s individual program. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) as defined in IDEA mandates that schools educate students with disabilities in integrated settings, alongside students with and without disabilities, to the largest extent appropriate according to Salvia et al., (2017).
Special classes, separate schools, or removal from the general education class should only happen when your child’s learning or attention issues such as his “disability” under IDEA is so severe that supplementary aids and services can’t provide him or her with an appropriate education as stated by Salvia et al., (2017). Salvia et al. (2017) went on to explain that during assessments, it is vitally important that educators must look at ways to incorporate the child in learning with his or her non-disabled peers as much as …show more content…
possible. Protection in evaluation procedures under IDEA is a legal obligation to protect students’ rights to ensure that procedures are fair, equitable, and nondiscriminatory.
In addition, testing or evaluations selected and administered to children with disabilities must be racially and culturally nondiscriminatory according to Salvia et al (2017). To the highest extent that is feasible, students must be assessed in their native language or primary mode of communication. When a test is given, it must be validated for the specific purpose for which it is being used, and it must be administered by trained personnel in conformance with the instructions provided by the test producer. Tests must include those designed to provide information about specific educational needs, not just a general intelligence quotient. Evaluations should be made by a multidisciplinary team that includes at least one teacher or other specialist with knowledge in the area of suspected disability. Children should be assessed in all areas related to a specific disability, including where appropriate health, vision, hearing, social emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communicative skills, and motor skills. Overall, a fair and comprehensive assessment should be made on each child that strikes a balance so that so decisions about the child are based on more than their performance on a single test or evaluation and is fair and
equitable. Parent rights are paramount in decision making. When any decisions that affect identification, evaluation, or placement of students with disabilities are to be made, parents and legal guardians must be given the opportunity to take part in the decision making and the right to have an impartial due process hearing if conflicts between the parents and the school personnel arise according to Salvia et al. (2017). Schools must give parents the opportunity to inspect their child’s records and oppose any of the contents that they feel should not be made a part of their child’s records. If parents are not in agreement with psychoeducational decisions made by school personnel, they have the right to have their children independently evaluated. In addition Salvia et al. (2017) also stated that before any evaluations that may result in placement changes for students with disabilities occurs, parents must receive written notice.
In this case, the IEP requirements of the child Frank Evans were not met by the school and the district. The reading and the facts provided in the case show that the district did not have any IEP for the child prepared at the beginning of the school session (Wrightslaw - Caselaw - Evans v. Rhinebeck (S.D. NY 1996), n.d.). The IDEA states that the IEP has to be prepared in a meeting where the child’s parents, a qualified spokesperson from the concerned school, the child’s teacher and when possible the child himself. With the consensus of the people mentioned here a detailed document about the assessment of the child’s educational needs and an action plan to meet the same is devised. Frank Evans was within his legal rights under IDEA to have an IEP for himself which was not provided and hence severely undermined the child’s performance levels in the school (FindLaw's the United States Supreme Court case and opinions,
The IEP team may include the student, their parents, a regular teacher, a special education provider and other representatives, such as a social worker or relative child care provider. These meets are required to be held within 30 days of the student’s acceptance into the special education program. Every IEP has the two main goals of setting reasonable learning goals and establishing academic services that the school will provide. The IEP should state which state and district-wide assessments that the student will or will not participate in and why.
IEP Development. In developing the IEP, the team should determine the child’s present level of academic achievement and functional performance and project whether any additions or modifications to the instruction or services are necessary to enable the child to meet measurable annual goals and to participate, as appropriate, in the general education curriculum. IDEA requires that the team considers the student’s strengths; parents’ concerns; evaluation results; and academic, functional, and developmental needs of the student. The IEP team must also consider individual circumstances. One special consideration is whether the student’s behavior impedes that student’s learning or the learning of other students. If so, the IEP team must consider the use of positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS), and other strategies, to address the behavior.
I chose to do my paper on students with Individualized Education Program’s for this fact alone. The majority of these students do not look any different from the other students. They want to be a part of the general education classroom setting. They may have mainstreaming and inclusion with IEP’s which makes the lives for these students more thriving. The main goal I have discovered in my reading of Individualized Education Program is placing the student at the center. The student is the main priority and their IEP focuses on meeting their educational needs. In reading, Inclusion and Mainstreaming I learned in the past, physically and mentally disabled children were often stricken form society and placed in separate institutions. This ended on November 29, 1975 when the Education for all Handicapped Children Act was signed. The Act required the government to provide ample funding for all handicapped children from ages 3-...
Parents play a critical role in the planning of educational programs for their children. In efforts to increase parental involvement, instructions were added to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that mandated active parental participation during the preparation of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). According to Lo (2008), when IDEA was reauthorized in 2004, additional parental rights were added that required the attendance of parents and every member of an IEP Team, unless both the parent and school agree to an absence and document that agreement in writing. That mandate emphasizes the importance of parental participation in educational programming for their children.
IDEA 2004, placed laws and policies that required for students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to be education in the school and classroom that they would be in if an IEP was not present (Blackenship, 2007). This move called inclusion was meant to not segregate students from their non-disabled peers and be able to integrate them in social settings. IDEA 2004, meant to provide special education students additional rights as a student with special education needs such as additional services, inclusion, and specialized school placement. School placement dependent on if the current neighborhood school the student enrolled in could not provide the student’s IEP services by implementation. Many students with IEPs, were unable to receive their specialized services due to the lack of school resources and supports. Therefore, many students with IEPs in public sectors were then relocated to schools that had funds to allocate more resources or private schools settings. These placements in private schools were all financed by the school district due to their requirement to provide students with special needs appropriate services academically. School placement in private schools gave students with specialized education an upper hand in achieving their IEP goals that may not of been feasible in their current schools. These private placements that were funded by the
The Individualized Education Program is developed by a team that includes the parents of the student, a general education teacher, a special education teacher, a school representative (principal), a person knowledgeable about evaluation (school psychologist), and others at request of IEP participants. The primary job of the IEP team is to plan a program of special education and related services that is reasonably calculated to provide a meaningful education benefit. The IEP Process includes a review of assessme...
Pierangelo, R. A., & Giuliani, G. A. (2013). Assessment in special education: A practical approach. (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Inclusion of all students in classrooms has been an ongoing issue for the past twenty-five years (Noll, 2013). The controversy is should special education students be placed in an inclusion setting or should they be placed in a special education classroom? If the answer is yes to all special education students being placed in inclusion, then how should the inclusion model look? Every students is to receive a free an appropriate education. According to the Individual Education Act (IDEA), all students should be placed in the Least Restrictive Learning Environment (Noll, 2013).
Assessments must be worth taking for the students. These assessments should present useful information and questions to push the students to think and gain valuable experience when taking these tests (Testing Action Plan 1). The tests should be made with high quality. Test with high quality result in actionable, objective information about the student knowledge and skills (Testing Action Plan 1). Students will only spend a certain amount of class time taking standardized tests. Schools should recommend the state to come up a time limit of no student should spend more than two percent of her classroom time taking these tests (Testing Action Plan 2). Also, letting a parent know when their child is about to hit their limit would have the parents involved in what is happening with their child at school. Tests should be made so they are fair for everyone in the school. A fair measure of student learning for students with disabilities and English learners should come into accountability (Testing Action Plan 2). Teachers should be able to help students that have a learning disability or English learners on the test so they have a fair advantage like the rest of the
IEP stands for Individualized Education Program. An IEP is a written document required for each child who is eligible to receive special education services. It is provided to a student who has been determined first to have a disability, and second, to need special education services because of that disability. An IEP is very important and should never be overlooked by anyone. The purpose of an IEP is to make sure that only students whose educational performance is affected by a disability receive special services. An individual program plan is designed to make sure that students get the kind of educational experience that they deserve; an experience that results in success. The end goals for students who are on an IEP are to be involved in
It is important that teachers give children a fair chance to show their knowledge when assessing. “The purpose of assessment is to provide feedback that can be used to improve student performance” ( Orange 2000). Teachers assess children to ensure that they are understanding the material, and to make sure they are learning. For young children especially tests should never be the only criteria of assessment. Instructors should always make sure that their assessment is fair. When testing a child, make sure that the testing method used is appropriate for that child. For example, if giving a test that relies on visual aids to administer the test it is important that the teacher is certain that all the children have good enough vision to clearly see the aids.
There are many different opinions on this issue, as would be expected. Whether those opinions are from parents of healthy children, parents of children with learning disabilities, teachers, principals, the list goes on. “It has been more than 30 years since the federal government first declared that children with different abilities shouldn’t be automatically separated from one another in school,” says Shah, in her article about the idea of mainstreaming students. The way society will feel about the idea depends a lot on how you present the argument. People may believe that students should not be mainstreamed just because the disabled children are not good enough to be in classes with all the other students in the school. Some people may have the opinion that pupils with the learning disabilities should be sent to different school and/or classes, simply because there the students would be able to receive the help specifically catered to their disability. In her article, Shah also quotes Whitbread, who says, “Is the child breathing? Then they belong in a regular class. I think that people respond to the civil rights argument, that it’s wrong to separate children. Would you put all the blue-eyed children in one classroom? Of course you wouldn’t,”. Of...
Exceptional students are able to advance and grow with individualized provisions and accommodations set forth by a team of people. Heward (2013) explains that special education is set in place to help children be able to become functioning and contributing members in school and in humanity. All students learn differently and should be treated as individuals. I have four children and they all learn in different ways. By understanding how each of my children learns, I can better help them to excel in school. Exceptional children should expect the same treatment as those in the general classroom. They too learn differently and should be treated as individuals. Educators need to understand an exceptional child’s assets and struggles and teach to their strengths in order to improve their weaknesses. According to Heward, teachers should use teaching methods that are backed by research and should measure student performance in an effort to make sure children are receiving a great education. Making sure that every child’s needs are being met and that they are receiving a quality education is a teacher’s biggest
Individuals with Disability Act has greatly impacted the way education has been taught across the United States. IDEA was put in place, to better the way education is taught to children with disabilities and to children without disabilities. Special education as a whole, has faced many challenges. Educators have been working on to reduce the gap between effective teaching practices and what exceptional children experience in the classrooms. Components of IDEA has also greatly impacted educators’ roles within the American system and the lives of individuals with disabilities.