Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Victorian era essay
Books being banned essay
Literature of the victorian age essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Victorian era essay
Throughout history, books have repeatedly been challenged, banned, and censored by all types of people and organizations for purposes such as self-preservation, and for a multitude of reasons such as presence of witchcraft to violence and age inappropriateness. Call of the Wild follows the life of Buck, a pampered dog who lives a luxurious lifestyle in California until he is thrown into the unrelenting and harsh environment of dog slavery in Alaska, a result of the gold rush. The novel has since been the target of totalitarian governments ruled by fascist dictators in Europe, primarily Yugoslavia, Nazi Germany, and Italy. These such countries imposed their absolute power through the promotion of conformity and dismantling signs of individualism …show more content…
London, being raised in a challenging and difficult setting, learned to succeed on his own which began to reflect greatly on his stories and attitudes he displays in his novels. From the start of the novel, London wastes no time in showing the reader that he embodies himself- “I was a rampant individualist. It was very natural. I was a winner” (Thor 1), with Buck- “Additionally, abuse by masters requires self-defense. Buck quickly learns that he needs to protect himself if he wants to survive” (Thor 1). London’s ideals strongly correlate with the foundations of rugged individualism, which is more or less the polar opposite of social conformity. This, in turn, outed London as an enemy to be handled and crushed by the totalitarian dictatorships- which they attempted to do through burning, censoring, and banning. Furthermore, the underlying idea of enduring and persisting through life’s challenges no matter how hard they may turn out to be develops and strengthens Buck’s independent mentality. As a result of this, Buck symbolizes the author himself (Thor 1). Another reason for Call of the Wild’s suppression is due to the recurring examples of dark tones and bloody violence. These such examples contain gruesome descriptions and have been argued as age inappropriate for middle school readers. Although there are quite gory descriptions, such as when “[the …show more content…
As Call of the Wild was published in 1903, it was essentially set up to be challenged, only a couple of decades before the rise of the totalitarian governments, whose primary goals consisted of ceasing the work that opposed their theories and ideals. Through “the indirect promotion of individualism and socialism, London [became] a cocktail for revolution against the dictatorships of Europe” (Thor 2). Because individualism and socialism is taught to the followers of European dictatorships as a corrupt force, it is so forcefully influenced to the point that books are suppressed in a multitude of forms. As the main ideal of European dictatorships at the time, the government's went to extremes to make sure that their followers wouldn’t have access to media that might have a chance of affecting their ideology, leading to them deeming thousands of books, such as London’s Call of the Wild, radical and illegal to possess or read. Even though it may seem hard to read at times, London’s genuine and new style of writing is what allowed him to be such a great author. He used this to stand out from other authors at the time, by writing in an unorthodox method and insinuating radical
Being said so, parts in the book where violence such as wolf attacks, gunshots, and potential homicide is clearly depicted through simple yet powerful vocabulary. The book also contains parts about kissing and a sexual act which was depicted through a fade-to-black style. Although the book contains such scenes, the depth of the words that were used to elaborate a particular scene was not too strong and was in fact in a moderate level. The book can therefore still be suitable for young readers. At the same time, the characters within the book are also of the same age range which made it easy to understand and relate to the story as it progresses and
John Burroughs accused Jack London for being a ‘’Nature Faker’’. Some Critics even said London animal hero’s are men in fur. There is an article about writers like him that was asked can any writer create a believable and compelling nonhuman character without being a nature faker? Why might Jack London have chosen to attempt this difficult technical feat and what is he trying to communicate to readers through his portrayal of Buck? Richard E. Miller called Jon Krakauer’s critique of London vehemence. Krakauer’s fury was for authors whose life and words don’t line up. Since Mc...
London teaches us the harsh effects that nature can have on someone who is unprepared. We see that simple mistakes, like not traveling with a partner, or not bringing enough food, can bring down the whole trip. It shows us that pride can be the ultimate downfall of a man. Pride leads to overconfidence in oneself, which can lead to illogical decisions, which can lead to disaster. As was the case with the man in London’s story, his pride overtook him and led him to make choices that were senseless. We must learn from his actions and don’t think too highly of ourselves, but instead make informed and logical decisions. This includes asking the opinions of others and taking their advice, especially those far wiser and experienced than us. We must heed the warning that London gives us, and strive to live with
Christopher McCandless had always admired the works of Jack London. He even went as far as naming Jack London “king”. McCandless relished the naturalisitc elements of London’s writings, elements that he chose to ignore in his own life. Jack London often depicted men as being controlled by their environment and being unable to withstand any heavy circumstances. He depicted themes about the frailty of man and man’s inability to overcome nature. But McCandless clearly did not take away any of the valuable lessons from these stories. He hailed London as “king” but never truly learned from London’s stories, dying in a tragically ironic way when he came to meet the same fate as the protagonist in Jack London’s “To Build a Fire”. Christopher McCandless
First off, Buck shows an act of heroism when he backs up and defends John Thornton at a bar. A very evil-tempered and malicious man named Burton was trying to pick a fight with the tenderfoot at the bar, and John Thornton came in between the two men. Without warning, Burton struck Thornton across the face. Instantly Buck hurled himself into Burton. “Those who were looking on heard what was neither bark nor yelp, but a something which is best described as a roar, and they saw Buck’s body rise up in the air as he left the floor for Burton’s throat” (87). Buck had to be pried off of Burton, so he didn’t kill him. Buck almost killed a man who only punched Thornton. If Buck had no civilization in him like critics said, he wouldn’t have defended his master. It even said in the book, “But his reputation was made, and from that day his name spread through every camp in Alaska” (87). This reputation he made was, “If you set a finger on John Thornton and Buck was around, be ready to get your head ripped off”. The only reason he had this reputation was because of the intense love he had for his owner, and a
The Call of the Wild by Jack London was published in the year 1903. This book was a great piece of writing in which it shares the story of a dog named Buck that went from an area of safety and comfort to a place of hard labor and darkness. The Call of the Wild was inspired when he visited Yukon during the gold rush and he saw how the owners treated the dogs. “Jack London's experiences during the Klondike gold rush in the Yukon were the inspiration for The Call of the wild. He saw the way the dog sled teams behaved and how the owners treated them.”( Library of Congress,June 25). Then after the book was published it was banned, according to online books page by the online library from the University of Pennsylvania, “ Jack London’s writing was censured in several European dictatorships in
To begin with, portrayals of death and violence in young adult literature provide essential information to
Jack London wrote the novel The Call of the Wild; it was also his first success (Feast). The Call of the Wild is an exciting beast fable which dramatizes the unforgiving harshness of existence but shows that suffering can lead to heroic self-awareness (Buckner). London was big on the philosophical idea of Naturalism. As well as having links with literary naturalism, "The Call of the Wild is also a mythical book informed throughout with such traditional myths as the Myth of the Hero." Although Buck is always a dog throughout the story, his predicament is highly relevant to the human condition in a novel beginning with concise patterns of description and moving toward an increasingly lyrical style (Williams). The protagonist of The Call of the Wild is a dog named Buck. He's part German Sheppard and half Saint Bernard, he's labeled the "hero" of the story. The story takes place primarily in the Klondike region of Alaska except for in the first chapter it takes place in the Santa Clara Valley of California. The story is centrally focused around Buck; if it wasn't for him not having any speaking parts the reader would think he was a human because of the personality traits he possesses. In this paper we will discuss traits such as Buck's ability to adapt, Buck's bravery, his mental and physical strength, his loyalty and love and his instinct of the wild.
In The Call of the Wild, Buck finds comfort in his relationships with man. When he is initially removed from Judge Miller's house in Santa Clara Valley, he is given his first exposure to the wild where, "every moment life and limb were in peril" (London 31). But soon he finds himself not entirely ready to leave civilization and answer the call of the wild, because he must first experience love. Buck establishes a relationship with John Thornton, and "love, genuine passionate love, was his for the fir...
Throughout the novella London uses various figurative language techniques to portray Buck’s gain of knowledge of the wild. From the beginning of the novella Buck’s life is easy and calm, then when he is forced to become a sled dog he is disorientated and is confused to what is happening. He progressively learns more things about the real world and starts to understand it. At the start of the novella London shows that at Judge Miller’s house he is the king and he is the one in charge. This is show when London writes “And over this great demesne Buck ruled.”. Lat...
(28) First, Buck begins by hunting wild game. (29) For example, Buck kills a black bear and a bull moose and eats from their corpses. (30) Since Buck can kill his own meat and consume it, he is nearly wild. (31) Second, Yeehat Indians attack John Thornton’s camp unleashing Buck's wildness. (32) For instance, Buck, who no longer recognizes Man’s laws, slaughters the Yeehats despite their weapons, “…they heard a fearful roar and saw rushing upon them an animal the like of which they had never seen before. (33) Buck, a hurricane of fury, hurled himself on them in a frenzy to destroy.” (35) Since Buck can attack and kill Man, he is now wild. (36) Last, Buck joins a wolf pack. (37) For example, Buck is confronted by a wolf pack and must battle his way into the pack. (38) Since Buck will eventually lead and pack and pass on his superior natural traits to his offspring, Buck, a descendant of the wild, has answered the call of the wild. (39) In conclusion, Buck has found his true identity as a wild animal.
In this story ,Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives presenting imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals. He is using the elephant as a symbol of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. He uses a large and very powerful animal to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.. In doing so he leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. Orwell?s moral values are challenged in many different ways, ironically enough while he too was the oppressor. He is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If he lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the...
Jack London brings man versus nature discussion into his story. The environment, however doesn't play against him for say, but does warn him from the very beginning. The audience can conclude that just like “the man” everyone is alone in the world - fighting for ourselves and the things we wish to acquire. The character created by London is isolated from the universe and fooli...
As for sexual references and so on, I agree that there are a few mildly disturbing referencing to sexual organs in the human body, but as a middle school student, the person reading this should not be surprised or afraid to delve a little into this topic because it is merely the human body. I don't think that parents should ban or censor books of this nature from there children at this age, I believe whether its a violence, sexual content or religious problem in the book, the parent should just explain it as it is before they allow their child to read it that way they know the “proper” perspective the parents would like to set for their child. for example, if it is a religious problem (Atheism), instead of saying the book is “taboo” and
The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.