Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The call of the wild book buck essay
How does Buck change throughout the Call of the Wild
An essay on the change of buck in the call of the wild
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The call of the wild book buck essay
First off, Buck shows an act of heroism when he backs up and defends John Thornton at a bar. A very evil-tempered and malicious man named Burton was trying to pick a fight with the tenderfoot at the bar, and John Thornton came in between the two men. Without warning, Burton struck Thornton across the face. Instantly Buck hurled himself into Burton. “Those who were looking on heard what was neither bark nor yelp, but a something which is best described as a roar, and they saw Buck’s body rise up in the air as he left the floor for Burton’s throat” (87). Buck had to be pried off of Burton, so he didn’t kill him. Buck almost killed a man who only punched Thornton. If Buck had no civilization in him like critics said, he wouldn’t have defended his master. It even said in the book, “But his reputation was made, and from that day his name spread through every camp in Alaska” (87). This reputation he made was, “If you set a finger on John Thornton and Buck was around, be ready to get your head ripped off”. The only reason he had this reputation was because of the intense love he had for his owner, and a …show more content…
truly barbaric dog would never in a million years have this type of love for a person. Not only did Buck have courage, but he had a noble quality called love. How could anyone see these two qualities and say Buck is not a hero. Secondly, Buck also shows great heroism when he wins an almost impossible bet for John Thornton.
John Thornton is challenged with a bet of $1,600 that Buck cannot pull a 1,000 pound sled 100 yards. Because it normally took ten dogs to pull a sled of that size, the chance of Buck winning the bet was very slim. “He had caught the contagion of excitement, and he felt that in some way he must do a great thing for John Thornton” (93). There were many men who believed that Buck could not pull such a load, but because of his courage and strength like true heroes posses, he persevered and he pulled the sled 100 yards. Buck could have easily given up because the prize of winning had no benefit for him, but because he wasn’t a barbaric beast, he did it for his master. He accomplished a feat many dogs can not even come close to doing, and this is why Buck is actually a true
hero. Finally, Buck shows a humongous amount of heroism when he saves John Thornton’s life from rushing rapids. John Thornton and his two partners, Hans and Pete, were lining a long narrow poling-boat when suddenly the ice broke and, John Thornton was thrown into the rapids. “Buck had sprung in on an instant; and at the end of three hundred yards, amid a mad swirl of water, he overhauled Thornton” (88). Unluckily for Buck, he could not drag Thornton out of the rapids the first or the second time. It took Buck three tries, and during those three attempts, he put his life in danger just so he could save his beloved master. If Buck was truly barbaric and not a hero, why would he have put his life on the line for his master. Buck had adapted and had the ability to survive on his own without a master, but he still ran back to his master and saved him. This act of heroism shows great courage and noble qualities like bravery and attachment toward his master.
When comparing the characters we meet in The Oxbow Incident with Erik Baard's list on attributes a cowboy should possess, we find out that there are quite a few discrepancies. The novel as a whole is the story of a group of men who decided to form a lynch mob and go after a group of men who are responsible for murdering a townsman and for apparently stealing cattle from Drew's ranch. The lynch mob sets and tries to track the rebels who are responsible, they come across three men who they have decided are the trouble makers and all in all they decide to hang them men. At the end of the novel we find out that these three men were not the rebels, in fact they were wrongly accused by the mob, and now the mob were murdered because they did kill them wrongfully. The story is full of contradictions on what a cowboy should be, when it is being compared to Baard's list. In Baard's article he had a quote from Bonnie Wheeler who stated, "The idea of the American cowboy is the direct lineal descendant of the chivalric knight." While we could argue that the mob traveling out to find the rebels was brave, it did not make up for them acting as if they were the final law and judgment instead.
In her book, Limerick describes the “idea of innocence” that permeated the American West (36). According to the author, the underlying motive for every action was pure (even when it really was not). According to Western American folklore, early settlers did intend to victimize Indians and trespass on their land, but instead came to America to pursue new opportunities and improve their lives (Limerick 36). The same ideological theory may be applied to the motivations of the sensationalized outlaws from the time. For example, in her book Limerick details the life of John Wesley Hardin, an outlaw, who began his violent life of crime at the age of fifteen (36). According to the story, Hardin shot and killed a black man (Limerick 36). However, idolized as the son of a preacher, Hardin hid his crimes behind the veils of “bravery” and “honor” (Limerick 36). He claimed that he actually shot the man --...
Because of the outlaw hero’s definitive elements, society more so identifies with this myth. Ray said, “…the scarcity of mature heroes in American...
One aspect of the novel in which Twain uses satire is the idea of family feuds. Mid-way through the novel, Huck meets young Buck Grangerford. Huck soon learns of an everlasting feud existing between the Grangerfords and the neighboring family, the Shepherdsons. Buck explains to Huck his fierce hatred for the Shepherdson family, but also that he truly doesn’t know why there is a feud or how it came to be. The reader finds out that the two feuding families essentially switch off killing members of the opposing family. As Huck experiences first hand a skirmish between Buck Grangerford and Harvey Shephardson, in which Buck tries to shoot Harvey, he asks Buck what Harvey had ever done. Buck responds with, “Him? He never done nothing to me(120).” Confused, Huck then asks what he wants to kill him for. Buck answers, “Why nothing- only it’s on account of the feud(120).” In this instance, Huck questions the logic behind such foolishness. He is young, but he understands that this feud has no point. He represents Twain’s own questioning of man’s preoccupation with brutality, and his illusion of false honor and chivalry. Taken at face value, the few Shepherdson-Grangerford scenes seem nothing more than a meaningless cameo on Twain’s part, however with closer inspection, we see the true motiv...
The deer season last fall was my most successful season ever. I have been deer hunting since I was fourteen. Each year I have shot at least one deer, but none were that special because they were all does. This year because I was going to college and wrestling I didn't think I would have a chance to get the big buck.
For instance, when Buck shoots Harney from behind a bush, Col. Grangerford, Buck’s father, said, “‘I don’t like shooting from behind a bush. Why, didn’t you step into the road, my boy?’” (Twain 111). This gives insight to what the characters really value, pride, but at the cost of one’s safety to bring harm to another due to fear and selfishness. Twain uses the Grangerford and Shepherdson feud to show that man, as a whole, tends to be inhumane to man due to selfishness and fear.
Buck had been raised in California, on the ranch of Judge Miller. There he had the run of the place and was loved and pampered by all. Unfortunately, one of the judge's workers had a gambling problem and stole Buck to sell him for fifty dollars. Buck fights being tied, caged, and beaten, but his efforts only frustrate him. He is put on a train and a boat, being shipped to Alaska to be used as a sled dog. Although he is miserable on the journey, Buck learns an important lesson - the law of the club. If he does not obey, he will be beaten.
What really happened at the Battle of the Little Big Horn has spawned countless books and opinions as to why General Custer attacked the Sioux and Cheyenne on June 22, 1876. The books and online articles that recount the facts, timeline, and who survived were written based on facts but are not all unbiased in perspective. Most of these writers want to prove that Custer was either a hero or a villain. From the perspective of the general’s men, they saw him as a fearless leader, one of the few who would ride out in front of the battle, while those on the political end interpreted the general’s actions as selfish and reckless. Custer’s last stand gave him immortal status at the price of not only his own life; but also those of his entire brigade involved due to a tactical blunder. Unfortunately, the magnitude of this “mistake” cannot be over-looked, but to negate what he accomplished in the Civil War and Indian Wars is the argument that continues to rage on. Was General Custer really an American hero or an over aggressive general who was looking for fame and glory?
In The Call of the Wild, Buck finds comfort in his relationships with man. When he is initially removed from Judge Miller's house in Santa Clara Valley, he is given his first exposure to the wild where, "every moment life and limb were in peril" (London 31). But soon he finds himself not entirely ready to leave civilization and answer the call of the wild, because he must first experience love. Buck establishes a relationship with John Thornton, and "love, genuine passionate love, was his for the fir...
In life, things will happen, and I can promise you that. Good or bad? There’s no telling, but in either one, you must always persevere. In The Call of the Wild, Buck must keep going and never lose hope. If he does, there is a slim window for survival. When you get badly hurt sometimes you just want to break down and cry, but in my dad’s position that wasn’t an option. While Buck is a dog and my dad is a human, they both can relate. Perseverance is a hard trait to have but in life threatening situations, it can go two ways. We can be broken, but nothing is immendable. We can always be fixed no matter what happens. Buck and my dad can prove that.
Can you envisage acquiring anything you want in life? For instance, having a huge mansion, servants serving you at your command and an extravagant garden behind your mansion, which has an orchard that has all types of fruits you can imagine eating. In this novel, The Call of the Wild, Jack London, invites you to exploit the life of Buck who is half St. Barnard and Scotch Shepherd dog. His life was luxurious, but one event changes his whole life. He used to live with Judge Miller in an extravagant house in San Diego, California, but one day a greedy gardener abducted and sold him to northward as trained sled a dog.
While both Walt Longmire and Vonnie are sitting at the local bar they begin to talk about the mounted Antelope behind the bar.“Pop used to speak in biblical terms, but what he said was that the brutes of the field don’t feel pain like humans. That’s the price we pay for thinking.” (Johnson 23) She is saying that because they are animals they don't feel the normal guilt that humans do everyday. The boys that were found guilty might have felt invincible at the time but as time went on they began to figure out that because of the crime that they committed it began to tear their families apart and almost immediately destroyed their reputation.Custer had the same problem when he lost his battle to the Native Americans. But instead of everybody knowing about his failure as an American Army Colonel little was ever really spread about the fact that he lost to Native Americans. “Even today, most Americans are familiar with the fact that our army once went down to a devastating defeat at the hands of wild indians. Beyond that , little is actually know about Custers debacle by the average citizen.” (Henry VII) It not only damaged Custers reputation as an American Colonel because of the massive underestimation he made about the Native Americans but it would have damaged the reputation of the rest of the American Army so they described the Indians as “wild” and “savage” making it look as Custer's battalion was incredibly overmatched so it didn't damage their reputation as the greatest military power in the world. Now Cody and Jacobs reputation wasn't covered up what so ever as they were being judged by the community that knew them and where the crime had happened, but at the time of Custer’s debacle there was no one around at the time for his reputation to be as incredibly slashed because there was no community to judge him other than his fellow comrades he died
Certain individuals have a drive that can lead them to achieve what they desire most. In the Short story “The Rocking Horse Winner”, D.H Lawrence showcases this through character motivation and symbolism. He further this using pursuit of desire, and how if you take it to a certain extent it can result in tragedy if the individual chooses not to conform. Paul wants to please his mother because his mother feels that there family has no luck, but Paul proclaims that he is lucky. Paul suddenly becomes consumed with this sudden spree of good luck and feels this is the only way he will be able to gain to the affection of his mother. D.H Lawrence reveals that Paul has a certain flaw that turns him to believe that the only way he will be able to gain his mothers love and affection is by winning money in the horse races. He leads this pursuit of desire to the standards he thought he wanted to, but not to the standards that would have achieved what he wanted, which leads to his down fall. When individuals desire love from another, they may choose to conform their beliefs and actions to that person. At first they may feel successful, however if they sacrifice everything, in pursuing this kind of goal, they may pay a heavy price instead of gaining there hearts desire.
Buck is a great example of this; he is a smart, passionate, loyal, friendly, tireless, fierce friend. When Buck was with Francois and Perrault, they tried to show Buck who the boss was by beating him with a club. This made Buck angry, “Bitter rage was his, but never blind rage.” Buck showed he had good virtue of humanity because despite being beaten, he still hung in there and lead the team of dogs. Buck also jumped into a river to save John Thorton’s life on page one hundred twenty eight; this was an act of selflessness and sacrifice because Buck almost lost his own life in the process. “The rope thus tightening on him in the sweep of the current, he was jerked under the surface and under the surface he remained till his body struck against the bank and he was hauled out. He was half drowned.” Page one hundred thirty seven shows that Buck has a good virtue of humanity because he was willing to do anything to make sure his owner was happy. Thornton bet that Buck could pull a sled one thousand pounds from a stationary position. Buck did this for the love of his owner and he took this challenge with pride. “Muscles writhing and knotting like live things under the silky fur.” And he did not fail to impress his owner. At the end of the story when Buck moved on after his owner was murdered that showed that Buck loved his owner. Buck turned to rage because his owner was inappropriately killed. He also showed that Buck knew that it was time
survive was to listen, watch and learn. Buck wanted to be the leader and fought for what