Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of the indian mutiny
The consequences of the indian mutiny
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The consequences of the indian mutiny
The Indian Mutiny of 1857 has been one of the most popular events in Indian history; many historians dispute over the origins of the fight debating whether the event was a militaristic matter or a national uprising. Historians also argue about the intentions of the mutiny. Was it an abrupt reaction, or had the Indian rebels been planning and organizing the event over time? Evidence has been given from both sides stating the opinion of the causes of the mutiny. It could have been a number of reasons from racial inferiority, religious differences, and suppression. Indians attempt to rise against the British Raj but failed in their attempt due to a lack of organization, power, and help from foreign aid.
India was clearly suppressed by the British
…show more content…
Some historians say that there was an evident lack of organization, preparation, leadership, and direction. They also argue that the leaders were not men of high ideals, with selfish motivation and low competence. On the opposing side, historians will argue that the mutiny had been planned long before it happened. Savarkar believed that independence would best be achieved through violence. He attempted to show how effective a unified front could be towards the British. Indian nationalist looked at Savarkar’s work as the interpretation of the Indian Mutiny since it was the first account that showed the Indian perspective of the uprising. It displayed the rebels as heroes and the British as the villains. This interpretation was different from others because the other perspectives mainly came from British historians, which exuded a sense of pride and superiority. Although many debate over the military power and effects of the mutiny, Disraeli argued that the mutiny was actually not only a military uprising but a national effort to rid the British rule in
Much like chapter two, chapter four provides an overview of the East India Company's Bengali sepoy regiments. Chapter five addresses the major causes of the Sepoy Rebellion, and summarizes its events and participants. Chapter six provides a short historiographical review of three Indian texts on the Sepoy Rebellion, exposing the reader to Indian interpretations of the events. Finally, part three consists of chapter seven, which is a comparison of the major similarities and differences of Batavian Revolt and Sepoy Rebellion, and serves to highlight key aspects of both.
These improvements and benefits from British rule eventually led to Indian nationalism. The exposure to European ideas caused an Indian nationalist movement, the people dreamed of ending Imperial rule.
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
In the beginning of the 1600's, the East India Trading Company first landed in India. Once the EIC landed they immediately decided that they would take direct control of the area. Meaning that they had no regard for the inhabitants. After complete domination of India the EIC later had to deal with the Sepoy Mutiny; therefore, there was death and a change in leadership soon to fallow. Britain then took control of India by kicking out the smaller version of themselves, but over 50 years later history repeats itself with another massacre. Although Britain imperialism can be looked at positively by advances made in India, it is outweighed by its negative counterpart which crippled the country through India's economic shutdown, High death tolls,
Khan, Syed Ahmed. "The Causes of the Indian Revolt." In Meridians: Sources in World History., edited by Mark Kishlansky, New York: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010.
A schoolteacher tells Irie to “Never read what is old with a modern ear” (Smith 272). Though this is mentioned in reference to a Shakespearean sonnet, it is emphasized by the teacher and works in tune with the didactic tone of the book. The teacher tells her students that “it will serve as today’s principle” and tells them to write it down. This is Smith reiterating that one cannot dwell on the past from a modern viewpoint because one will have a warped perception of it. The same can be said for Samad Iqbal, who despite popular belief, insists on heralding his great-grandfather as the hero of the Indian mutiny.
This investigation seeks to discover whether or not the Sepoy revolution in 1857 had a sufficient impact on India’s rise to independence and separation from the British Empire. The Sepoy revolution was a revolution of the Sepoy soldiers in 1857, and complete independence from the British Empire was not achieved by Indians until 1947. Therefore, did the Sepoy revolution catalyze their rise to independence, or was independence inevitable? The impact of the Sepoy Revolution will be found by looking at the effects of the Sepoy revolution and determining whether or not they were key factors in the rise to independence. A variety of sources will be used. Two important sources that will be used during this investigation are Indian Summer by Alex Von Tunzelmann and Empire: How Britain Made The Modern World by Niall Ferguson.
During the first century of Britain many unique and abnormal events occurred which eventually would shape and mould it for centuries to come. Boudicca’s revolt is the pinnacle of Britain’s first century evolution, Boudicca was the Celtic queen of the Iceni tribe located in east Britain, and after her family had unspeakable misfortunes happen to them she instigated the revolt against Rome.
Under British rule in India, the British were harshly oppressive and only interested in exploiting products from India for their own use, causing many Indians to become extremely poor. They became so oppressed they were on the verge of violent civil disobedience, when Gandhi appeared to negotiate with the British threw non-violent tactics such as sit-ins and hunger strikes. The people were supportive on Gandhi and were set to become violent if anything happened to him. Things were resolved without violence.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
The French and Indian War was one of the devious, and devastating times for the planet. During this time period, many countries were involved in a global war that stretched even to North America. Europe was torn between Britain and France as their allies surged to back the feuding superpowers. The Indian inhabitants soon picked sides with either Britain or France. The war quickly escalated and became a global disaster and soon after, it came to North America. The colonies soon backed their mother countries as the French and the English again fought. The Seven Years’ War, or the French and Indian War, saw hundreds of Indians and thousands of innocent soldiers killed for power, pride, money, or land.
The mutiny lasted thirteen months: from the rising of Meerut on 10 May 1857 to the fall of Gwalior on 20 June 1858.The sepoys were quickly joined by large numbers of civilians supporting the reinstatement of both a Moghul and a Maratha emperor and by landlords, particularly those of Oudh, penalised by the new administration and its policy of exporting raw materials for manufacture in Britain. Historians agree that the mutiny was characterised by violent reprisals on either side but, at least in British historical tradition, the most significant events are the massacres at Meerut, Cawnpore and Lucknow; post-mutiny literature dwelling on the fate of women and children especially.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. From positive affects to negative affects, British colonized India. It all started around the 1600’s when the British East India Company entered India. Only as traders, they entered what was known as the Mughal Empire. Around the 1757 Battle of Plassey the Mughal empire fell (Carrick) and it was only a matter of time until the British Raj took their once in a lifetime chance.
There is a distinct difference between popular Indian nationalism, that is the nation believing in a state independent of Britain, and Indian nationalist movements, for example the Muslim League or the Hindu revivalist movement. These movements fought for independence but were far more religiously orientated and were fighting in their own interests. Although Indian nationalism initially found expression in the Mutiny of 1857, its deve...
As a direct result of the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian presence in the British army was reduced to almost a half of what it had been. Also whereas before Indian regiments had been allowed to exist separately, they were now incorporated to be part of larger British regiments. High caste Hindus and Brahmins were stereotyped as dishonest, because of their role as provokers and their nationalist sympathies. The opposite can be said of such groups as the Sikhs, who were portrayed as model citizens and soldiers.