Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A thesis on Indian Child Welfare Act
Racial disparities in the US judicial system
Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A thesis on Indian Child Welfare Act
In most adoptions, the biological parents control almost every single part of the adoption process. This includes getting to choose if it will be an open or closed adoption, and even who the adoptive family will be. One of the biggest flaws in the American adoption system is the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The Indian Child Welfare Act gives the American Indian tribes the right to take over the adoption process and place American Indian children with a family of Indians, the Indian Child Welfare act has also removed children from Non-Native homes and While race plays a significant role in the adoption process, the Indian Child Welfare Act should be revoked because many of the children affected are being taken away from their loving homes …show more content…
Naomi Schaefer Riley wrote an article titled”Put the Kids First”, and explained how much power the ICWA gives the Indian tribes, “...this has meant that if parents voluntarily put such a child up for adoption, tribal governments can block the child's placement with a non-Indian family--even if that child has never set foot on a reservation…”(Riley, Put The Kids First). It is shown that even if this child is given to the adoption program, the ICWA allows the tribes to choose where the child should live. The child might not have been raised around the Indian culture, but the tribes will still place them with people immersed in the Indian culture. That would be like putting a Catholic Pakistani with Muslim Pakistani’s. The child would have to completely change their views and practices in life. The ICWA lets tribes overlook over the whole reason of adoption and takes the best interests of the child and removes it in place of stability of the Indian culture.Timothy Sandefur and Aditya Dynar wrote about this in their article “For this 6-Year-Old, the Law Sees Only Race”, “Normally, adoption law tries to serve the best interests of the child. But the Indian Child Welfare Act forces courts to disregard that rule and place children, regardless of their individual needs, with members of Native American tribes:”(Dynar and Sandefur). What is the whole point of putting Indian children into the American foster home system and adoption system when the ICWA will interfere and let the tribes intervene? These children are being denied the right to possibly live with a non-Indian,willing and loving family
The term “Sixties Scoop,” was created by the writer, Patrick Johnson, to describe “the taking of thousands of Native children from their families, communities, and peoples during the 1960s to early 1980s” (Steckley and Cummins, 2008, 274). In the 1960’s, the government generally believed that an extension of child welfare services to reserves would be a practical approach to solving some of the problems on reserves. Although the social services may have had good intentions, “little attention was paid to the effect that extending provincial services would have on Indian families and communities [and there did not appear] to be any concern that provincial services might not be compatible with the needs of Indian communities” (Lloyd 2009). The majority of children that were placed for adoption were relocated to distant communities, different provinces and some were also placed in the United States to the dwellings of middle class Caucasian families.
Each year, there are thousands of children that are misplaced from their families and are seeking a permanent living placement. Their permanent placement may be found with family members or friends, or even through a private adoption. There are federal laws and state mandates that are implemented to ensure that the best interests of all children involved in an adoption or placement proceedings are heard. The best interests and needs of a child may include educational needs, medical needs, housing/placement preferences, or finding a family that reflects the ethnic and cultural heritage of the child in question. One federal mandate ensures that the heritage and familial background of children is protected and the best interests of the children are served. The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978 is a federal law that seeks to keep Indian-American children with Indian-American families. This law was created in response to an overwhelming population of Indian-American children being displaced from their families. This law was created to protect youth and help keep Indian-American children with their native tribes. In this paper, we explore the historical factors leading to the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act and the purpose of this Act. Further, we explore the development of this law, implementation of this federal law, and the contemporary debates that relate to the implementation of this law.
Before the Indian Child Welfare Act was passed, Congress discovered a startling statistic. 25-30% of all American-Indian children were taken from their families custody and placed with non-Indian families (Fletcher). It is impractical to believe that that many American-Indian families were inadequate to have children in their care. Even after they were taken away, the government took no interest in the child’s cultural identity and placed them with families outside the tribe, where they were never exposed to their native culture. After the ICWA was passed and Indian families were kept together, many long-term benefits appeared: Security, pride in heritage, and participation in the use of cultural norms (Cross). When the Indian children were being placed within their tribes instead of with people of other ethnic backgrounds, the children grew up immersed in their families culture and grew up to practice it themselves. They learned where their
Each year, there are thousands of children that are misplaced from their families and are seeking a permanent living placement. Their permanent placement may be found with family members or friends, or even through a private adoption. There are federal laws and state mandates that are implemented to ensure that the best interests of all children involved in an adoption or placement proceedings are heard. The best interests and needs of a child may include educational needs, medical needs, housing/placement preferences, or finding a family that reflects the ethnic and cultural heritage of the child in question. One federal mandate ensures that the heritage and familial background of children is protected and the best interests of the children are served. The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978 is a federal law that seeks to keep Indian-American children with Indian-American families. This law was created in response to an overwhelming population of Indian-American children being displaced from their families. This law was created to protect youth and help keep Indian-American children with their native tribes. In this paper, we explore the historical factors leading to the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act and the purpose of this Act. Further, we explore the development of this law, implementation of this federal law, and the contemporary debates that relate to the implementation of this law.
"On Indian Removal." Social Policy: Essential Primary Sources. Ed. K. Lee Lerner, Brenda Wilmoth Lerner, and Adrienne Wilmoth Lerner. Detroit:
Our Indian legislation generally rests on the principle, that the aborigines are to be kept in a condition of tutelage and treated as wards or children of the State. …the true interests of the aborigines and of the State alike require...
The Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994 (MEPA) (P. L. 103-82), was enacted on October 20, 1994 by President Bill Clinton ("Multi-Ethnic Placement Act," n.d.). The MEPA was passed to prohibit any agency or individual receiving Federal assistance that is involved in the adoption or foster care programs from delaying or denying the placement of a child based on the race, color, or national origin (RCNO) of the child or the adoptive or the foster parent (Civic Impulse, 2017). According to the Department of Human Services Online Directives Information System, adoption is the social and legal process designed to establish a new legal family giving children the same rights and benefits of those who are born into a family (2016). According to the Department
Why would an Indian choose to live on a reservation? An Indian may choose to live on a reservation because they have grown up there their whole lives and so have their parents, grandparents, and even their ancestors. They want to share the same values, morals, and traditions and keep their culture and beliefs alive. What are some of the challenges in being in this subculture?
Many potential adopted parents have experienced heartbreak, anguish and other problems that can be associated with adoption. There is an imbalance in the Nations foster care system and the system needs to be strengthening and the quality of services improved.
When I heard the clicks of heels in the hallway, I sat up attentively on the waiting couch. A pleasant looking woman came to greet me. She was in her mid fifties and introduced herself as Celeste Drury. She worked with the children home society, an adoption agency that is located in Oakland. I found Celeste through a family friend. The family friend knew my interest in learning about adoption and the criteria used for adoption processes. I was excited to meet Celeste and to learn about what she did. Settling in my chair, Celeste slightly cheered me. Celeste orphanage was licensed under the adoption agencies act. It has been in existence for many years. Children home society is in charge of providing adoption services in the entire state of California. I asked Celeste of its role and she said that it “helps parents to make informed decisions about their children, and also give tips on the adoptive parents” (Drury).
For a mother or father to learn that their adopted child, who they believed was an orphan, actually has a caring and loving family is heartbreaking. Adoptive parents feel guilty. The children yearn for their true home. The biological family feels deceived and desire for their child to return. This situation is far too familiar within intercountry adoption cases. Many children are pulled away from home, put into orphanages, and painted as helpless orphans. The actions perpetrated by adoption agencies reflects an underlying network of corruption and exploitation. This is not for the purpose of discouraging international adoption, but to shed light on the horrific practices taking place behind the scenes. Intercountry adoptions are often tangled
In the United States there are approximately 397,000 children in out-of home care, within the last year there was about 640,000 children which spent at least some time in out-of-home care. More than 58,000 children living in foster care have had their biological parental rights permanently terminated (Children’s Rights, 2014). Due to the rising number of children in foster care and the growing concerns of the safety, permanency, and well-being of children and families, the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 was signed into law. On November 19, 1997, President Bill Clinton signed the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, to improve the safety of children, to promote adoption and other permanent homes for children who need them, and to support families (Child Welfare League of America). The Adoption and Safe Families Act also promotes adoption by offering incentive payments for States. During the FY of 1999-2003 the payment to states which had exceeded the average number of adoptions received $20 million (Child Welfare League of America). The ASFA improved the existing federal child welfare law to require that the child’s health and safety be a “paramount” concern in any efforts made by the state to preserve or reunify the child’s family, and to provide new assurances that children in foster care are safe (Shuman, 2004).
Adoption is the complete and permanent transfer of parental rights and obligations, usually from one set of legal parents to adoptive parents(Ademec 27). Not until the late 19th century did the U.S. legislative body grant legal status to adoptive parents. This is when children and parents started to gain rights and support from the government. Through the years new laws have been passed and amended to keep the system fair to all adoptive parents. In 1994, Congress passed the Multiethnic Placement Act, making it illegal to delay the placement a child to find a racially matching family. In 1996 the Multiethnic Placement Act was amended to say, “One can not use race as a routine consideration in child placement”(Lewin sec.A). Before 1994, it was difficult to place a black child with white adopters. Last year 5,000 children were adopted from Europe, and 6,000 from Asia, while 183 came from Africa.(Lewin sec. A). The number of out-of-country adoptions are so high because of the requirements and regulations one must follow in the U.S. The requirements include being 21, and include being committed and loving. The home income must be adequate enough to support the family. Passing all of the medical exams and filling out the personal information is mandatory. But the main reason people adopt from overseas is because it is much quicker. A person can adopt a child from another country in a matter of months. In the U.S. the wait can exceed 5 years, which is why some people choose international adoption.
The Indian Child Welfare Act oversees the “order of preference for adoption priority descended from a member of the child’s extended family, an enrolled member of the tribe, Indian families not of the same tribe and finally, non-Indian adoptive parents” (Holt). These preferences for adoption referred those who were to be adopted as well as those in foster care. “These priorities dramatically reversed the federal and state policy that had led to the loss of thousands of Indian children from their tribal communities”
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), while important during its inception, is no longer necessary or in the best interest of the child, because its application has proven to be arbitrary with no uniform application. This paper will discuss the history and purpose behind the implementation of the ICWA, as well as the jurisdictional and procedural issues of ICWA. Further, I will discuss the primary reasons why the ICWA is no longer necessary in its current state. Lastly, I will propose a uniform system that would limit the reach of ICWA while still protecting the Native American culture. I. History and Purpose of the Indian Child Welfare Act.