Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of war
Negative effect of war
Effects of war [social, economic, military, political]
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of war
Inordinate Killings What could a story about a teacher student affair have in common with a story about a revenge killing? Both,“Ind Aff or Out of Love in Sarajevo” and “Killings,” focus on war as a theme (which may seem like a stretch). “Ind Aff or Out of Love in Sarajevo,” focus on the subject of war explicitly by rehashing the events that end up starting world war one. “Killings” theme of war is a bit difficult to notice since it doesn’t deal with war in a traditional sense. “Killings” focus on a war between two individuals this is where “Killings” and “Ind Aff or Out of Love in Sarajevo” differ. In “Ind Aff or Out of Love in Sarajevo,” going to war for the greater good of the many is noble, whereas in “Killings” going to war for selfish …show more content…
Like Princip, the father feels he must kill his oppressor. That however is where the similarity between Princip and Matts motives end. Princip believed his intentions were just while Matt feels uneasy about his decision to go to war with someone he has deemed to be worthy of death. Once Matt had found Strout (his sons killer) he took his gun and “pressed the muzzle against Strout’s head, pressed it harder than he wanted to” (102). Matt’s uneasiness is caused by the feeling that his actions will benefit no one. Matt’s choice to kill Strout leads to an emptiness, that only comes from doing something he doesn’t really believe is right. War ruins an individual if they make the decision to go to it for themselves. After Matt has killed Strout, he goes home to his wife. While Matt lies in his bed “he shuddered with a sob that he kept silent in his heart” (108). Unlike Princip, Matt has to hide his act because he feels to ashamed of it enough to face the consequences. Matt went to war for himself and it brought him nothing but an even sharper pain than he had to begin with, a decision that alienates him from the rest of the living individuals in his
What kind of stories have you read? Have you read of any that in a way have similarities and differences with one another? The two short stories in this essay are "the cask of amontillado" and "the killings". These short stories are ironically the same but with different perspectives. Both authors have a different meaning for why they wrote the stories. One of the similarities are that both stories have to do with killing someone. In "the cask of amontillado the narrator kills due to madness an the narrator in "the killings kills to avenge his sons death. Another difference is that after Montessor kills his "friend", he feels no remorse or guilt and Matt fowler from "the killings" feels empty and remorse after the killing.
The two short stories had many differences like time period, but had a huge common similarity, murder. The murder in the “Full Circle” was done out of jealousy and “The Most Dangerous Game” was done for sport. Some of the most
“Every war is everyone’s war”... war will bring out the worst in even the strongest and kindest people. The book tells about how ones greed for something can destroy everything for both people and animals leaving them broken beyond repair, leaving them only with questions… Will they ever see their family again? Will they ever experience what it’s like to
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
Having a to bury a child is hard. Letting the killer run free is harder. “Killings” has different types of feelings and personalities mixed into it. It starts out deep and depressing the around the middle, gets dark the gets back to being depressing but more relaxed. It has hot tempered personalities mixed with jealousy. A man is in grief and early stages of depression over his son’s death. Someone just wants to be a friend and help out the family.
He may not know what exactly a clone is, but he does know that everyone despises and hates him for it. At the Alacràn estate, matt is taken care of, but not in the most luxurious way possible. He gets cooped up like a wild animal in an minisculic room where Rosa, a maid for the Alacràn Estate, treats him like a dirty monster. The people of the Alacràn Estate start off with a deep hatred for Matt because they know he’s a clone.
“Killings", written by Andre Dubus in 1979, involves several aspects such as revenge, morality, and murder. Elements, such as the story’s title, the order of events, and the development of the characters, are very unique. It successfully evokes emotion and suspense as the plot unfolds in sequence. Though it seems easily overlooked, the title “Killings” is very important due to the fact that the thrill of suspense is left in the mind of the reader. The title encourages readers to question who and what. It is also an intricate setting for the plot’s mood. It implies that a murder has taken place, but that is all the reader knows. The chronology of the story uses a style called "in media res”, a term used to describe the common strategy of beginning a story in the middle of the action or entering on the verge of some important moment (Meyer 2198). In this story, the readers are shown that murder not only takes a life, but it can also take away a living persons sense of self worth, their spirit.
The characters have to face many fears in the House of the Scorpion. Keepers feared Matt since they knew nothing about him and he threatens their authority by being recognized as the leader of the Lost Boys. Often times people fear or dislike others that aren 't like them. Matt was not like other people because he was El Patron’s clone. The Alacrans dislike Matt since he 's a clone. They believe Matt is filthy like other clones since they knew nothing about him and is blinded by their prejudice. El Patron put a lot of fear into lots of people. Everyone fears him because he is so powerful. He is lord over the country called Opium--a strip of poppy fields between the U. S. and what was once called Mexico. ”Vampire! thought Matt. El Patron would have enjoyed that description. He loved to inspire fear”(pg.139). Fear helps the reader better understand El Patron and Matt because El Patron puts fear into everyone to gain power and
After an event of large magnitude, it still began to take its toll on the protagonist as they often “carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die” during the war (O’Brien 1187). The travesties that occurred with the brutality of war did not subside and began to affect those involved in a deeply emotional way. The multitude of disastrous happenings influenced the narrator to develop a psychological handicap to death by being “afraid of dying” although being “even more afraid to show it” (O’Brien 1187). The burden caused by the war creates fear inside the protagonist’s mind, yet if he were to display his sense of distress it would cause a deeper fear for those around him, thus making the thought of exposing the fear even more frightening. The emotional battle taking place in the psyche of the narrator is directly repressed by the war.
...the battlefield by one of his comrades, Robert experiences difficulty trying to get to sleep. All he wanted was a dream. Escape. But nobody dreams on a Battlefield. There isn’t any sleep that long. War is something soldiers go to in hopes of escaping or leaving their lives back in their home land. For some people relatable to Robert, trying to “find” who you are in war is considered to be an option. Going to war does not mean that you are a man, and sadly is viewed upon as a “manly” duty. Roberts struggles are based on his personal and family life, which he is unable to find his true calling or meaning in life throughout all of the chaos within his life. War should not be a result of a person trying to find who they are. War can only cause more mental and physical problems that can be traumatic for the soldier themselves just as Robert had experienced first-hand.
Usually when someone is murdered, people expect the murderer to feel culpable. This though, is not the case in war. When in war, a soldier is taught that the enemy deserves to die, for no other reason than that they are the nation’s enemy. When Tim O’Brien kills a man during the Vietnam War, he is shocked that the man is not the buff, wicked, and terrifying enemy he was expecting. This realization overwhelms him in guilt. O’Brien’s guilt has him so fixated on the life of his victim that his own presence in the story—as protagonist and narrator—fades to the black. Since he doesn’t use the first person to explain his guilt and confusion, he negotiates his feelings by operating in fantasy—by imagining an entire life for his victim, from his boyhood and his family to his feeling about the war and about the Americans. In The Man I Killed, Tim O’Brien explores the truth of The Vietnam War by vividly describing the dead body and the imagined life of the man he has killed to question the morality of killing in a war that seems to have no point to him.
One may have heard the simple saying that “Love can make you do crazy things.” Many adults can confirm that the saying proves true; one could even spend a few hours watching CSI type of shows that portray the stories of two love-struck people becoming cold-hearted killers just to be with their significant other. Why would they be so desperate to be together that they would kill anyone who got in between them? Desperation so serve that they would even kill a loved one? It could be that as children they were deprived of love and nourishment that children normally receive. This deprivation of love led them to cling to anyone that made them think they were being love. In A Rose for Emily and Tell-Tale Heart a character murders someone who they love. The two works, share similarities and differences when it comes to the characters, the narratives point of view and reason for killing a loved one.
The major theme of Andre Dubus’ Killing,s is how far someone would go for the person they love. It is important to note the title of the story is killings and not killers, for the reasoning that the story does not just focus on two deaths or two murderers but rather the death of marriage, friendship, youth, and overall, trust.
Soon after he begins watching him, Tam Lin explains how choices affect one's character to Matt. "…you can choose which way to grow. If you're kind and decent, you grow into a kind and decent man" (70). This confused Matt at the time, but he listened and it stayed with him. He diverges from El Patron many times with his choices. A good example of this is when he and Chacho fall into the pit. Using an enormous effort, Matt crawls out, but Chacho can't. He doesn't respond when Matt calls to him, so Matt doesn't even know if his friend is alive. Physically, Matt cannot do anything to rescue him, so he talks. "…he couldn't leave Chacho behind, either… He talked until his throat was raw, but he didn't stop because he felt this was the only rope he could throw to Chacho" (336). Matt is injured, exhausted, and scared. He doesn't know if one of his only friends is alive or not, but he keeps talking, keeps trying to help him, because it is the right thing to do. El Patron would not have done this. El Patron would have gotten out himself, and then disregarded his friend, because he always puts himself first. Matt shares his DNA with El Patron, but not his
Vincent Millay is a poem about death. Its told from the point of view of Millay who is observer in the shadows that watches a man prepare to go out and kill people. How she no long will be helping the man continue to carry on the heinous acts. She wants to make life better for her people. Soft power by Joseph S. Nye Jr. In this essay by Nye talks about how soft power is the power of getting people to do what you need without using any force. Nye brings up the point of how powerful countries need to find the balance between hard and soft power. A way that country’s display their soft power is with the help of companies, universities and churches of their country. Culture, ideals, and values have been a huge part the US attracting partners and supporters. Nye’s message is that the U.S cares about gaining the hearts and minds of others as it does on winning war. Neither victims nor executioners by Albert Camus in the essay Camus discusses violence, murder and the impact that is has on the victims and people who are involved in them. Albert wants to live in a world were murder is not legitimate. Albert wants to understand his point of view that he sees the world