An Overview Of Shelley's Incidents Upon Salisbury Plain

1458 Words3 Pages

The poem Incidents upon Salisbury Plain (otherwise known as Guilt and Sorrow) is a prime example of Wordsworth’s political visions of revolution for social equality, being weaved into his poetry. In the poem, Wordsworth writes of a society wrought with war and the misery experienced by a vagrant woman and wandering soldier. The poem captures a sense of despair, loneliness and disillusionment - no doubt a poetic representation of how it felt to live in a time of civil unrest. It could be said that the wanderer is comparable to the lower class, displaced without care, constantly searching for a sense of belonging. Wordsworth effectively exposes the isolation and despondency of the working class in the sense of dejection portrayed by the protagonists. …show more content…

Shelley himself is mostly praised, in a modern day context, for his poetic lyricism. However, when he was alive, most publishers refused to publish his work, fearing that they would themselves be accused of blasphemy or sedition. Though he came from an upper class background - his father was the Whig Member of Parliament for Horsham - Shelley was always preoccupied by visions of “a virtuous enthusiasm for those doctrines of liberty and justice” for mankind. Shelley wrote a number of poems that were intended to evoke thoughts of revolution. However, his desire for revolution was not one based on violence; in fact he believed that “faith and hope in something good” is something that “neither violence nor misrepresentation nor prejudice can ever totally …show more content…

He argues that the poet is a benefactor to humanity and should therefore support social advancement as opposed to repression. Literature, he says, contributes indirectly to moral improvement, and moreover that poetry “awakens and enlarges the mind itself by rendering it the receptacle of a thousand unapprehended combinations of thought.” Shelley adds that the social betterment of man is reliant upon the exercising of the “organ of the moral nature of man”13, otherwise referred to as imagination. In addition to this, Shelley contends that literature acts in response to the social climate; it thrives in periods of prosperity and political reform which endorse creativity. There is clearly a recognised correlation between poetry and politics, but it seems ambiguous as to whether revolutionary literature is actually a precursor of revolution or not. Furthermore, the lines are blurred between that of a rebellious social leader, and a mere social outcast. J. Drummond Bone argues, that “social exile is virtually a precondition of rebelliousness or rebellious social criticism”14

Open Document