Important Conclusions in Centesimus Annus
The encyclical letter Centesimus Annus, was written on
the one hundredth anniversary of Pope Leo XIII encyclical
letter Rerum Novarum. Centesimus Annus was written to honor
Rerum Novarum, but to also honor the encyclicals and
documents that helped Rerum Novarum become such an important
part of history. Pope John Paul II writes that the purposes
of Centesimus Annus are to look back at Rerum Novarum, to
look at the new things that surround us, and to look to the
future for it is hard to tell what will happen in the next
millennium. Centesimus Annus has many very important points
and the Pope concludes them with lots of different reasons
on why they are so significant. Over the next few pages I
will give the three most important conclusions, do the best
to my knowledge to try and give reasons that the pope gives
to support his claims. The three conclusions range from how
a business can be successful, to the roles that businesses
have their countries to grow, and to government, businesses
and society's role in human growth.
The first of the three important conclusions that the
pope draws upon starts with the assumption that profit is
the goal of every business and that a business is successful
if they make a profit. This is true, but according to the
pope in Centesimus Annus, the business will be truly
successful if they place more emphasis on the following
topics: placing more stress on worker to worker relations,
the dignity of work, and the developing of skills as well as
virtue. The pope first stresses his argument in section 35
saying " It is possible for the financial accounts to be in
order a yet for the people, who make up the firms most
valuable asset, to be humiliated... the purpose of a
business firm is not simply to make profit, but is to be
found in it's very existence as a community of persons."
This restates his conclusion, saying that of course the
purpose is to make a profit, but the workers must all be
able to work together and be paid well, and not have their
dignity revoked.
When people work, it is somewhat of a way of expressing
themselves, showing their gifts and talents while working
together with other people. This is one of the reasons why
the dignity of work is so important in this world, as the
pope says in part 6, " Work thus belongs to the vocation of
every person; indeed, man expresses and fulfills himself by
working. At the same time work has a social dimension
This paper focuses mainly on the sincereity as well as the passion with which we do our job. Human body is a very sophisticated machine created by God himself. It can do all sorts of things but there are a few things at which the human body gets very perfect.And that perfectness comes from practice, devotion,love,sincerity and responsibility towards that particular thing. Let me associate the word "thing" in the previous sentence as working. Working for living. Reason I chose to write on this topic was that the Poem " Singapore" written by author Mary Oliver that I read in the book by John Schilb and John Clifford influenced me alot. The Poem narrates the life of a woman which works on an aeroplane and is cleaning teh restrooms which are very dirty. She visually and physically finds the job dirty. But while cleaning that restrooms she sees it in her own world.She finds her hands working in pleasure as she is wondering the scenes of rivers. She realises the truth of life that she has to work to earn her living.
When the play Oedipus The King is mentioned, what do you think of? I think of a very ignorant man that tries to escape his fate-- a man that had so much confidence in himself that he would put false accusations on people and defy his gods just because he thinks he is right. During the play, Oedipus realizes his own flaws while he investigates who the "true killer" of Laius is.
"You have your eyes but see not where you are in sin, nor where you live, nor whom you
Currently, human beings are thinking more on the line of they need work in order to make a living. For that reason, work has become meaningless, disagreeable, and unnatural. Many view work as a way to obtain money and not a meaningful human activity that one does for themselves. The author states that there are two reactions of the alienated and profoundly unsatisfactory character of the modern industrial work. One being the ideal of complete laziness and the other, hostility towards work. Fromm believes the reason why people have animosity regarding work is due to their unconscious mind. Subconsciously, a person has “a deep-seated, hostility towards work and all that is connected to it” says Fromm. I believe what Fromm is saying to be true, after all I witness it everyday. Millions of people each day goes to a work which they are dissatisfied with and that can negatively impact their attitude
Additionally, King aimed to connect with the audience using rhetorical devices such as anaphora,repetition, and syntax. For instance, anaphora could be seen in paragraph 10 as King vividly repeats the phrase “when you have …”, attempting to show the audience that he’s had to endure a long list of grievances. Furthermore, repetition is visible in paragraph 9 as King continuously repeats the word “wait” seeking to intensify his message. Syntax is another rhetorical devices that King utilizes to get his message across. Notably within paragraph 10 as MLK states “Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say wait… then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait.” MLK chose not to give the
"Behold this Oedipus, --/ him who knew the famous riddles and was a man most masterful;/ not a citizen who did not look with envy on his lot-- see him now and see the breakers of misfortune swallow him!" (Oedipus the King, 1524-1527). Now that Oedipus has lost everything-- his wife, mother, kingdom, and all power-- his existence rests entirely on the aid of his two daughters. However, that dependence is not evenly distributed between Antigone and Ismene. Even though both daughters provide assistance to Oedipus, the relationship that Oedipus has with Ismene is weaker in comparison to the firm and unwavering relationship that he has with Antigone.
The famous Greek philosopher Aristotle outlined the requirements for a good tragedy, and he based his ideals on the classic Greek play Oedipus Rex, written by Sophocles. As Aristotle stated, the perfect tragedy must be an imitation of one’s life, realistic and narrow in its aspects. Such is the case with the play Oedipus Rex, a Greek play revolving around the tragedies of the life of King Oedipus. Oedipus Rex, the protagonist of the first of the three Oedipus plays, has a life of luxury and promise. However, because of the life fate has dictated him and the obstacles he has faced, Oedipus has been proven to have three hamartias, or tragic flaws. His attributes of determination, impatience/disrespect, and hubris greatly contribute to his downfall.
Oedipus’ tireless search and determination to find King Laius’ killer is what drives the audience’s feelings of pity towards hin. Oedipus sought to help his people by ending the plague, learning that he must vanquish the murderer of the former king. In doing so he learned not only that he himself was the murderer, but Oedipus also learned horrible things about his true identity. From the audience’s point of view at first, Oedipus had a very opulent life as king, and came from a royal family. To see details of his life unravel into shameful lies and horrible truths takes an emotional toll on the audience. It would be very hard for the audience not to have pity on a man has learned such abominable things about his origins and the tampering of
In the play Oedipus Rex, the main character Oedipus has many personal flaws that cause him to be innerly blind. Oedipus’ inner blindness lead to his status as a static character and his downfall by not seeing his flaws , and not understanding the consequences of not understanding himself.
Who cared for Oedipus when he was a child? Who taught him right from wrong? Who loved him unconditionally? Oedipus’ biological parents certainly did not. Oedipus had lived his whole life without his parents just because of a prediction of Oedipus’ fate. Oedipus Rex is trying to fight the plagues in Thebes. The only way to do that is to find the killer of the last King, Laius. Oedipus realizes that he killed Laius and leaves Thebes for what he has done. Oedipus’ parents, Laius and Jocasta, are to blame for his downfall because they did not raise him, they were going to kill him, and did not care about him.
Heraclitus was a Pre-Socratic philosopher who believed that logos was the nature and account for the universe (22B1-B2, 31). He describes that “[t]his kosmos… none of gods nor humans made… is and shall be: an ever-living fire” (B30, 34), making a connection of how fire is the “stuff” (Corner) that is the source of creation in the universe. He also mentions that “[f]ire is want and satiety” (B65, 35), indicating that fire is a force consisting of two opposites. Heraclitus believes that the unity of opposites consists of two forces pulling on each other to achieve harmony like a guitar and the tightness of its strings.
The Greek gods were believed to be invincible, all-knowing, and influential in people’s everyday lives, and it was thought that the gods would wreak havoc in the lives of those who did not obey. These beliefs coincide with an overall theme of Oedipus The King, which is to show reverence and fear towards the Greek gods. Initially, Jocasta is prideful towards the oracles and their validity, but her words and actions mask a lack of confidence; once her prophecy comes true, she becomes extremely regretful and respectful towards the oracles demonstrating an awareness of her own weakness.
In the play The Oedipus Play of Sophocles, by Paul Roche, the antagonist, Oedipus, unknowingly commits two dreadful crimes. One of the crimes was murdering his father and he unknowingly married his mother Jocasta. During the marriage, Oedipus, blindly searches for the dead king’s posse of assassins. Ultimately Oedipus begins to question his recalling of the murder he committed and and wonders if he actually killed the king himself. Although Oedipus’s destiny would remain the same his tumultuous past would alter his journey to the final outcome.
Oedipus did not have a fair start in life. His father, Laius, heard prophecy that Oedipus would one day kill his father and sleep with his mother. In order to prevent this, Laius gave Oedipus to a shepherd to be killed. Fortunately, through a string of events, Oedipus's life was saved, and he even went on to become the honored king of Thebes. Despite this feat, Oedipus still managed to make several decisions that ultimately fulfilled the original prophecy told to Laius, and inevitably sealed Oedipus?s fate.
Sophocles’ tragic drama, Oedipus Rex, presents to the reader a full range of conflicts and their resolution after a climax.