Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Purpose of foreign policy
Purpose of foreign policy
What is the most important foreign policy goal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Purpose of foreign policy
Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) is Essentially the Study of Actors and Agency
Module: Comparative Foreign Policy: Issues and Cases
Code: 13Eup603
Tutors: Professor Lee Miles
Student: Kaiyue Luan
ID: B325596
Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) is Essentially the Study of Actors and Agency
Due to the increasing domestic and foreign affairs and they are more intertwined, the growing of public interest, areas always has multiple goals. This is a focal point for the debate, to discuss how the country may act the world, what effects may be caused and which peril need to avoid. Foreign policy will be provided through political agency which involved many persons and some organizations. Obviously, the largest beneficiary in the foreign policy making is its actor. However, principal actor in international politics is the state. Thus, foreign policies only conducted by the state. Foreign policy analysis is a tool to evaluate the foreign policies. In other words, foreign policy analysis is essentially the study of actors and agency in a certain extent. In this article, we will have an analysis to evidence foreign policy analysis is essentially the study of actors and agency in a certain extent rather than totally.
Foreign policy has been the subject of reflection for diplomacy, for more than 2,000 years, from Thucydides through Machiavelli to Grotius (Christopher Hill, 2003). Nowadays, in politically foreign policy has been given more attention. Although, the study of interstate relations has already existent, and developed to the international relations, until World War II, FPA has been as a distinct and consciously theoretical enterprise ((Valerie M. Hudson and Christopher S. Vore, 1995). At first, during 1950s-60s, the ...
... middle of paper ...
... Foreign policy as a site for political action. International Affairs, 79(2), 233-255.
Hudson, V. M., & Vore, C. S. (1995). Foreign policy analysis yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review, 209-238.
Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor‐Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1-30.
Webber, M., & Smith, M. (2014). Foreign policy in a transformed world. Routledge.
Singer, E., & Hudson, V. M. (Eds.). (1992). Political psychology and foreign policy. Westview Pr.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (Vol. 3). New York: Free Press.
Steinbruner, J. (1976). Beyond rational deterrence: the struggle for new conceptions. World Politics, 28(2), 223-245.
Steinbruner, J. D. (2002). The cybernetic theory of decision: New dimensions of political analysis. Princeton University Press.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. Global Politics: A New Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.
It is the intention of this essay to explain the United States foreign policy behind specific doctrines. In order to realize current objectives, this paper will proceed as follows: Part 1 will define the Monroe Doctrine, Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 will concurrently explicate the Roosevelt Corollary, Good Neighbor Policy, and the Nixon Doctrine, discuss how each policy resulted in U.S. involvement in Latin American countries, describe how it was justified by the U.S. government, respectively, and finally, will bring this paper to a summation and conclusion.
Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake, and Kenneth A. Schultz. World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2013. Print.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Shiraev, Eric B., and Vladislav M. Zubok. International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Silver, Larry.
Psychology and Historical Interpretation. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. Print.
" Journal of International Affairs 52.2 (1999): 691. Academic Search Elite -. Web. The Web. The Web.
Mearsheimer J. J. (2010). Structural Realism. International Relations Thoeries, Discipline and Diversity (Second Edition), p.77-94
To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. 71-81. Print.
Kent, J. and Young, J.W. (2013), International Relations Since 1945: A global History. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mingst, K. (2011). Essentials of international relations. (5th ed., p. 70-1). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company
War.” Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War. Eds. Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999. 1-27.
The chosen level of analysis and international relation theory to explain this event are the individual levels of analysis and realism. This level of analysis focuses on the individuals that make decisions, the impact of human nature, the behavior of individuals acting in an organization, and how personality and individual experiences impact foreign policy decisions.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Balaam, David. Introduction to International Political Economy, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2005.
Weber, Smith, Allan, Collins, Morgan and Entshami.2002. Foreign Policy in a transformed world. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.