Importance Of Communication In King Lear

684 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: King lear communication essay

In King Lear, letters seem to act as the main means of communication amongst the characters, playing a vital role in the play. In particular, the method of communication between the Duke of Kent and Cordelia is peculiar, as both seem to have information on each other that they possibly couldn’t have had.

When King Lear disowns Cordelia, the Duke of Kent is soon banished afterwards for defending her. After this, Cordelia and Kent begin to communicate through letters sent by messengers. These letters seem to be circulating in high speed, reaching Kent even when he is in disguise and on the move. These letters, sent from a king’s disowned daughter to a banished Duke, could be very dangerous if intercepted, therefore, the messenger would have had to deliver them directly to the individual, and not the place they were staying at. This brings up the question of how the messenger, or Cordelia, could have known about Kent’s disguise and his whereabouts, when he had yet to disclose them.

In act II, scene 2, Kent, in the stocks at Gloucester’s house, and calls on the “warm sun” (2.2 line 177, page 95) to “approach, thou beacon to this under globe,| That by thy comfortable beams I may| Peruse this letter” (2.2, lines 178-180, page 95).

I know 'tis from Cordelia,
Who hath most fortunately been inform'd
Of my obscured course; and shall find time
From this enormous state, seeking to give
Losses their remedies. All weary and o'erwatch'd,
Take vantage, heavy eyes, not to behold
This shameful lodging.
Fortune, good night: smile once more: turn thy wheel! (2.2, lines 181-189, page 95).

There is no real answer to how Kent has the letter in his possession, and how the messenger knew where to find him. It is possible that Kent could have mentioned...

... middle of paper ...

...s intercepted.

Cordelia doesn’t send a reply to Kent’s letter through the gentleman, making Kent ask him about her reaction when she read it. Kent therefore asks if “made she no verbal question” (Act 4, sc.3, line 28, page 187) and if the gentleman had “spoke not with her since” (4.3, lines 41-42, page 187). This indicates that Kent and Cordelia also communicate through verbal messages sent through the same messengers, which would explain the discrepancies and gaps in written communication.

The reader is unable to follow the timeline of the scenes through Cordelia and Kent’s letters because of the missing pieces in the play. The play’s plot, in a way, is developed based upon the various letters. Due to the inconsistent method of Cordelia and Kent, can the reader read the play based on the letters, or must they look beyond the play itself for its full meaning?

Show More
Related

  • Letter from Birmingham Jail Analysis

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    King begins his letter by establishing his credibility to the clergymen in order to assist in making his arguments stronger. His first words to the clergymen are “My Dear Fellow Clergymen.” By addressing the men in this way, King is implying that he is equal ...

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Letter From Birmingham Jail

    902 Words  | 2 Pages

    By using the description of personal events and being extremely open about his feelings, King is open in creating a sense of responsibility in the readers for not standing up and saying or doing something. His concrete examples aid in the pathos of the letter because they invoke feelings of liability in the readers.

    Read More

  • Comparing Reality In King Lear And The Wars

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    Timothy Findley and Shakespeare use the theme of appearance versus reality in their texts: The Wars and King Lear. Characters in the novel and the play: Robert, Goneril, and Regan, intentionally appear to be something they are not in order to achieve a goal. However, they differ in where it leads them by the end, as in King Lear the characters die, unlike in The Wars where Robert cannot escape his true self and goes back to follow his personal morality.

    Read More

  • Allusion In Letter From Birmingham Jail

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    The tone of the letter changed as you got more in-depth. Beginning the letter, King was respectful to the clergymen because he acknowledged that he did not usually answer to criticism, but since they were good men, he would

    Read More

  • Dimmesdale's Guilt and Internal Struggle in Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Mr. Dimmesdale finally confesses to the townspeople in the last hour of his life, he reveals what many saw to be a red A on his chest. Whether the letter was carved by him in an act of self-mutilation, if it was merely a figment of his guilt-ridden imagination, of if it was indeed created by Chillingworth’s torture, it is a symbol of the guilt that Mr. Dimmesdale endured. While it may seem like a poor mockery of Hester’s letter, which was visible to everyone, Mr. Dimmesdale’s caused him much more pain than Hester’s caused her. Over time, Hester’s letter came to be accepted by the townspeople, and once Hester had been accepted there was discussion of allowing her to remove it. In contrast, Mr. Dimmesdale’s letter was not visible to the public, though it caused him much pain.

    Read More

  • Analyzing MLK's Refutation of Alabama Clergymen's Criticisms

    1241 Words  | 3 Pages

    King begins his letter with an appeal to ethos. By saying “My dear Fellow Clergymen,” King forces himself to be

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr. versus Henry David Thoreau

    911 Words  | 2 Pages

    King's letter, written while in jail, is in direct response to a letter written by a group of "fellow clergymen". His letter clearly and effectively responds to each of the five examples given by the clergymen. He opens his letter by recognizing that he believes their complaints to be "sincere" and of "genuine goodwill". The respect given to these men in the first few sentences immediately present King as a man of equal standards and beliefs. It also has a subtle and maybe subconscious affect as he asks for the same respect in return. The letter is noticeably divided into 6 major components. The first five sections are in direct response to the letter from the clergymen, and the last is his final plea for justice. He opens each section by conceding to the clergymen, and uses direct quotes from their letter to support is argument. Following this opening, he uses a...

    Read More

  • The Tragedy of King Lear Analysis

    2095 Words  | 5 Pages

    In The Tragedy of King Lear, particularly in the first half of the play, Lear continually swears to the gods. He invokes them for mercies and begs them for destruction; he binds both his oaths and his curses with their names. The older characters—Lear and Gloucester—tend view their world as strictly within the moral framework of the pagan religion. As Lear expresses it, the central core of his religion lies in the idea of earthly justice. In II.4.14-15, Lear expresses his disbelief that Regan and Albany would have put the disguised Kent, his messenger, in stocks. He at first attempts to deny the rather obvious fact in front of him, objecting “No” twice before swearing it. By the time Lear invokes the king of the pagan gods, his refusal to believe has become willful and almost absurd. Kent replies, not without sarcasm, by affixing the name of the queen of the gods to a contradictory statement. The formula is turned into nonsense by its repetition. In contradicting Lear’s oath as well as the assertion with which it is coupled, Kent is subtly challenging Lear’s conception of the universe as controlled by just gods. He is also and perhaps more importantly, challenging Lear’s relationship with the gods. It is Kent who most lucidly and repeatedly opposes the ideas put forth by Lear; his actions as well as his statements undermine Lear’s hypotheses about divine order. Lear does not find his foil in youth but in middle age; not in the opposite excess of his own—Edmund’s calculation, say—but in Kent’s comparative moderation. Likewise the viable alternative to his relationship to divine justice is not shown by Edmund with his ...

    Read More

  • The Secret Diary of Lady Macbeth

    1506 Words  | 4 Pages

    Later that day Macbeth received a message from the King saying he was to become Thane of Cawdor. He called me his "dearest partner of greatness" and plans to share the glory of the golden round with me. He sent the letter by messenger despite the danger of the contents being read by others, when it could have waited until he arrived here.

    Read More

  • King Lear - Family: A Medium For A Betrayal

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Love is whatever you can still betray. Betrayal can only happen if you love." (John LeCarre) In William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of King Lear, characters are betrayed by the closest people to them. The parents betray their children, mostly unintentionally. The children deceive their parents because of their greed and power hunger. Their parents were eventually forgiven, but the greedy children were not. Parents and their children betray one and other, and are only able to do so because they are family, however, the children betray for greed while the parents betray through the credulity caused by their children's greed.

    Read More

  • Birmingham Jail Argument

    404 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout this letter, King uses elaborate diction and complex rhetorical strategies. He addresses his audience directly; makes frequent use of balance and parallelism, understatement, and metaphor; and makes many historical and religious allusions. What effect do you think King intended these rhetorical strategies to have on the letter’s original audience of clergymen? Does King’s elaborate style enhance his argument, or does it just get in the way?

    Read More

  • Social Values in King Lear

    1221 Words  | 3 Pages

    In King Lear, Shakespeare portrays a society whose emphasis on social class results in a strict social hierarchy fueled by the unceasing desire to improve one’s social status. It is this desire for improved social status that led to the unintentional deterioration of the social hierarchy in King Lear. This desire becomes so great that Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall were willing to act contrary to the authority of the social hierarchy for the betterment of their own position within it. As the plot unfolds, the actions of the aforementioned characters get progressively more desperate and destructive as they realize their lack of success in attaining their personal goals. The goals vary, however the selfish motivation does not. With Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall as examples, Shakespeare portrays the social hierarchy as a self-defeating system because it fosters desires in its members that motivate them to act against the authority of the hierarchy to benefit themselves. A consideration of each characters actions in chronological order and the reasons behind such actions reveals a common theme among the goals for which morality is abandoned.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Horatio In Hamlet

    1337 Words  | 3 Pages

    Here’s the letter. You can read it all you want. It even has the official stamp of the king. Anyways, let me continue on with the story. Knowing that my “friends” were on a mission to kill me, I revise the letter

    Read More

  • A Compare/Contrast Analysis of Plot Development Between Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and King Lear

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare’s dramatic theatre performances have long endured the test of time. His tales of love and loss, and even some history, make a reader think about events in their own life and what they wish to accomplish in life. Though written for the stage, Shakespeare’s plays have life lessons that readers of the great works can take put into effect in their own lives. Some may say that his plays are out dated, and are something of the past; though they were written in the 1600’s, they have morals and themes that can apply to life. “You've got to contend with versification, poetic license, archaisms, words that we don't even use any more, and grammar and spelling that were in a state of flux when the works were written,” says Pressley in an attempt to explain how to read Shakespeare. Once read and understood, however, one can start to compare and contrast different plays. The ways in which Shakespeare’s two plays King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing are similar out numbers the instances they are different, even though one is a Shakespearian tragedy while the other is a comedy.

    Read More

  • The Role of the Fool in King Lear

    2166 Words  | 5 Pages

    It would be impossible to label all the roles that Fool plays to his king. His only assigned brief - an entertainer of the court - is most likely the fool’s least important. Fool acted far more importantly than a mere source of entertainment, being Lear’s informative protector and friend. By far his most significant role was that of a moral instructor to his king. Fool teaches Lear that humans are unable to know themselves completely.

    Read More

More about Importance Of Communication In King Lear

Open Document