Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bipedalism in evolution
Importance of bipedalism to man
Essay of bipedalism and bipedal hominids
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bipedalism in evolution
The development and Significance of Bipedalism in Early Hominids to Human Evolution
Clearly bipedalism is important and has some significant role to human evolution; if it didn’t have such importance modern day humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) would not be bipedal. There are many vital stages of human evolution that’s leads to us humans being successful at adapting to their environment and by extension surviving; one of these vital evolutionary stages is bipedalism. What is bipedalism? This is the ability to move around on two legs upright instead of moving around on all fours. Bipedalism played a very significant role in the development of early hominids in evolution.
According to M. Friedman, ‘the development of bipedalism was the first significant adaptation that distinguished hominids from other apes.” This quote shows that bipedalism was truly a revolutionary development and it had great influence on human evolution. Dictonary.com explains a hominid as ‘any of the modern or extinct bipedal primates including all species of the genus Homo and Australopithecus.’ The first bipedal hominid would have been the Australopithecus anamensis. Australopithecus anamensis tibia fossils which were found showed strong bipedalism, the tibia found had a right angle between the shaft and the proximal surface and dates back to 4.2-3.9 million years ago.
Australopithecus aferensis is another species that exhibit bipedalism; they lived about 4 to 2.8 million years ago and evolved from the Australopithecus anamensis. Lucy which happens to be one of the well-known fossils is a member of the species Australopithecus aferensis. There is substantial information about early bipedalism found in this species. According to elucy.org ‘Australopithecus afere...
... middle of paper ...
...ppear bigger to other species and probably intimidate them. Another advantage that bipedalism would have brought was thermoregulation(the ability to keep the body temperature in a certain environment), according to elucy.com ‘a taller upright posture in the hot savanna environment enabled more heat to escape from the sides of the body because a lot more surface areas is exposed to the cooling wind and air.’
All of the developments of bipedalism and the advantages it bought along with it allowed hominids to evolve into the Homo sapiens sapiens were are today. Without bipedalism we wouldn’t be able to walk upright, use our hands which we use for a vast amount of things or keep our bodies at the right temperature in harsh conditions. Bipedalism had a significant role to play in the development of human evolution and by extension gave us a greater chance of surviving.
...“Sexing fossils: a boy named Lucy?,” a peer-reviewed article by James Shreeve, and the article “Lucy’s kind takes humanlike turn” address subjects including sexual dimorphism, sex-based behaviors, and speciation of Australopithecines. While the two articles differ in the research and findings presented, they share a main, significant conclusion about Australopithecines, which is the sexual dimorphism in body size. Male A. afarensis are evidently larger than females, although there is some disagreement as to how much larger (the degree of sexual dimorphism).
Lucy was bipedal and her brain was smaller than that of modern humans. Lucy resembled an ape and was able to make tools to find food and weapons.
After analyzing the remaining family group, their appeared to be a difference in size among the discovered fossils. Johanson claimed that all the remains found belonged to one species; however, other anthropologists and scientists disagreed and believed that two or more were from different species. The analysis of Lucy’s knee joint indicated that cranium, mandible, dentation and postcranial skeleton contained unique characterizes, which resembled in a large degree the ones in a human being, and also indicated bipedal locomotion. After analyzing the remaining family group, their appeared to be a difference in size among the discovered fossils. Johanson claimed that all the remains found belonged to one species; however, other anthropologists and scientists disagreed and believed that two or more were from different
Australopithecus afarensis who existed 3.5 million years ago and a 4.4 million year old skeleton of an Ardipithecus ramidus are the closest science has come to discovering the human lineage. Shattered Ancestry an article written by Katherine Harmon discusses the remains of two hominids found within Ethiopia. These skeletal remains have created a huge controversy within the topic of evolution questioning many assumptions that have been made referencing the human lineage. The skeleton of the Australopithecus afarensis was named Lucy and was discovered in 1974. The evidence of her walking upright on her two feet essentially guaranteed her a spot in the human lineage line. Lucy was a chimplike ape that was said to walk upright making scientists believe the human ancestry was simple. The complete skeleton found in Ethiopia of an Ardipithecus ramidus named Ardi completely changed all assumptions made from scientists about the complexity of the human lineage. These remains have encouraged researches that the human line is not the only lineage to have evolved but the chimpanzee line has undergone drastic changes as well. There are many traits that researchers have always directly linked to the human lineage however since these discoveries occurred researchers are reconsidering. The recent discoveries that have shattered what has always suggested what linked a species to the human lineage have changed the certainty of whether it is possible to confidently identify the human’s last common ancestor. Majority of scientist had forgotten that there would have been many hominid species living together at one time. New theories have been suggested since scientists revealed that the foot of a hominid found called the Burtele site was found ju...
If you were to live during the tertiary period, this would be one of the things you would often see. All of the mammals that existed during that time period were terrestrial. They all were land dwelling mammals. Before J. G. M. Thewissen and colleagues’ discovery in Pakistan, many scientists believed, since the constant new discoveries twenty years ago, in what the numerous fossils from North America, Pakistan, and Egypt have revealed, “…these early cetaceans had mobile elbows and external hind limbs with articulated knees. However, they were fully aquatic, except for Ambulocetus, which was amphibious-much like sea lions” (Walking with Whales).
If Shipman is correct and humans evolved from animals that were primarily scavengers, previous explanations for human evolution would have to reviewed and compared to the new evidence. Current understanding of the development of bipedalism as an evolutionary advantage would change. Standing upright would be considered an advantage to finding carcases for scavaging, instead of a predatory reason. This small change in our understanding of human ancestors, would change how human understand themselves. Shipman uses tool and teeth marks on bone and early hominid's physical biology to support her claims.
Australopithecus afarensis existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago. The distinctive characteristics of A. afarensis were: a low forehead, a bony ridge over the eyes, a flat nose, no chin, more humanlike teeth, pelvis and leg bones resembled those of modern man. Females were smaller than males. Their sexual dimorphism was males:females; 1.5. A. afarensis was not as sexually dimorphic as gorillas, but more sexually dimorphic than humans or chimpanzees. A lot of scientists think that Australopithecus afarensis was partially adapted to climbing the trees, because the fingers and toe bones of the species were curved and longer than the ones of the modern human.
Many factors could have played a part in the evolution to bipedalism. Some of these are adaptation to environment and the need to have free hands to handle tools and weapons. These factors were the basis of Charles Darwin's theory of the evolution of quadrupeds to bipeds. (Hawks). Advantages of bipedalism include the ability to see farther and wider distances because you can see from a higher vantage point; the ability to carry food, tools, and weapons; and more efficient movement.
Bindon, Jim 2004 Fossil Hominids. ANT 270 Notes. http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/bindon/ant270/lectures/ hominids1.pdf Delson, Eric 1981
There is great debate over the concept of primate evolution. Some research supports the idea that evolution occurred linearly as a continuum while other research supports the idea that fossils found to date should be separated into individual species. Through morphological, and geological evidence this paper explores this topic and provides concise arguments to further develop the understanding of human primate evolution.
extinct for 4000 years, it is difficult to tell exactly what they lived on, but
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
Throughout the long winding road that is human evolution; many species have helped shape who we are today. There was the early Australopithecus africanus which began to walk bipedally-upright with two feet and the Homo habilis which drastically developed the construction of handmade tools. But there is one species who is to be credited for the most critical advancements in human evolution; Homo erectus. Not only did Homo erectus advance us the most biologically, but also the most geographically.
The members of the Homo genus possess a combination of unique features that distinguish them from other related species. At the time that each respective species was alive, they were able to walk upright on two legs, use their large brains for the benefit of their species, and could thrive in many geographically and climatically diverse areas of the world. One of the most mysterious quandaries in science is how the lineage of the Homo genus became so different from their primate relatives. Bipedalism, brain size, and location diversity all have a common link that may explain this difference – dietary evolution allowed humans to adapt to their surroundings, and in turn, become a more advanced species. The Homo diet evolved in relation to food availability and nutritional necessity. With the ability to maintain a proper diet, the species of the Homo genus were able to flourish and advance toward the development of modern Homo sapiens.
The evidence for human evolution begins with the australopithecines. All the australopithecines were bipedal and therefore possible hominines. In details of their teeth, jaws, and brain size, however, they modify enough among themselves to be divided into five species: Australopithecus anamensis, A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. robustus, and A. boisei. Genus Homo are also divided in five different spices: Homo erectus, H. habilis, H. sapiens, and H. sapiens sapiens.