Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of assessment in learning
Characteristics of formative and summative assessment
Characteristics of formative and summative assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of assessment in learning
2.1 Assessment
Assessment and evaluation both describe a process of collecting and interpreting evidence for some purpose. (wayne Harlen. 2007)
As brown said in his book "teaching by principle" on 1994 assessment is the necessary element for effective teaching. He said testing has negative meaning and make stressful atmosphere in the class informal assessment give learner freedom to experience and try out their own hypothesis about lg without feeling judged
On the other hand every time learners answer a question, make a comment or use a new word or structure and teacher can evaluate student's performance is assessment. in recent years the view toward educational assessment changed noticeably. Assessment and student learning showed inseparable
…show more content…
Teacher more commonly refer to this form of assessment as formative to indicate that children's ideas and understanding shaped.
2.3 AOL
Devis Hayes in 2010 referred to AOL as summative assessment. Summative assessment are the test which is given at the end of the lesson or semester and also at the end of school year to find out what has been learned summative assessment used to determine the purposes. (Erin D,Caffrey_2009)
2.4 Standardized test The standardized test is perhaps the best known example of a summative assessment ( A lassoed, gy, Micheal, Riverta Wilon,2008)
The Johnson center (child health and development) defined standardized test as " a test that is given in a consistent or "standard" manner.
Standardized tests are designed to have consistent question, administration procedures, and scoring procedures when a standardized that is administrated, is it done so according to certain rules and specification so that testing conditions are the same for all test takers.
As Haladyna and Downing and Rodriguez(2002) mentioned generally standardized tests are as sample of good tests. The definition of good test according to Harris (1989) and Brown (1987) include tree elements _ reliability , validity and practicality (as cited in sofendi,
Current educational policy and practice asserts that increased standardized student testing is the key to improving student learning and is the most appropriate means for holding individual schools and teachers accountable for student learning. Instead, it has become a tool solely for summarizing what students have learned and for ranking students and schools. The problem is standardized tests cannot provide the information about student achievement that teachers and students need day-to-day. Classroom assessment can provide this kind of information.
In conclusion I feel that using effective assessment methods throughout any course allows tutors to give feedback at the right time to allow the correct progress for the learners to achieve. I have experienced feedback many times as coach and more recently as a teacher and feel it has only helped me to improve and to keep wanting to improve so I can inspire others to achieve.
Standardization is the processing of making sure tests are uniform and non-bias. If this exam has not been standardized, then it is not a fair measurement of that student's knowledge about the subject. Tests must be based on facts only.
What exactly is standardized testing you may ask, it is a test which measures the knowledge among different students. There are many different standardized test in many different forms. High school standardized test include the SAT, ACT, and the awful dreaded FCAT. There are also standardized test in many different fields such as Medical (MCATs) or the standardized test needed to enter law school (LSATs). Most of these test are needed to get excepted into a certain school you want to go to or to get a scholarship.
A standardized test is any form of test that requires all test takers to answer the same questions in the same way and is scored in a “standard” or consistent manner. This makes it possible to compare the performance of students or a group of students. First off, there
Throughout one's educational career, students are required to take standardized tests to show their progress and if they meet certain requirements they could qualify for higher educational opportunities. Some common standardized tests include: Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), American College Testing (ACT), Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), Missouri Assessment Program (MAP), and Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL). Standardized tests are designed so that each person taking the test has the same chance to do well, so that the scores can be compared to one another. There are many positive and negative results from standardized tests. It can be difficult to see if the standardized testing is beneficial or a hindrance.
Pinellas School District, & Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (n.d.). Formative vs. summative assessments. In Classroom assessment. Retrieved from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/basic/basica.html
Assessments are an important part of teaching. Assessments are a good way for teachers to monitor students’ learning and understanding. Knowing students’ level of understanding can help teachers improve students’ learning and guide their instructions. In the future, I plan to continue assessing students in multiple ways such as, asking questions, illustrations and writing to adjust my instruction. I also plan to encourage students to assess their own work so they are involved in their own learning as well as look for ways to “employ technology to support assessment
Solley, B. A. (2012). On Standardized Testing: An ACEI Position Paper. Childhood Education, 84(1), 31-37. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2007.10522967
In the past, assessments were popularly conducted for the purpose of accreditation, but with the growing change in the quality of education, it has become evident that assessments aren’t just products to qualification but as Sieborger (1998) identifies, is that assessment is the process of gathering and interpreting knowledge to make valid and justifiable judgements about the learners performance and the assessors ability to transfer and establish knowledge to the learners. What is pivotal in assessment is that it enhances teaching and learning; it is also the crucial link between learning outcomes, the content that is taught and learning activities. Furthermore, Sieborger (1998) states that assessment is a reciprocal process; as it is used by both learners and teachers to decide where the learners are at in their learning and where they need to go and how best to get there. The characteristics that Sieborger identifies to be contained in assessment are made up of: tasks, exercises, tests and exams, which are set and assessed by educators. There are different methods and uses of assessment that are used in the Education system, the reason for this, is that not all assessments serve the same purpose for its methodologies, the feedback that learners receive needs to correspond with the purpose of the assessment.
Assessments are according to Edglossary.org (2014), “the wide variety of methods that educators use to evaluate, measure, and document the academic readiness, learning process, and skill acquisition of students”. Assessments can be used to identify several important aspects of learning and development. First, they can be used to distinguish a child’s strengths and weaknesses as well as measure specific knowledge and skills. Assessments can also be used to demonstrate what a child has learned and what they understand (“Assessment,” 2014). My opinion of assessment has not changed; however, now I understand how to use assessments that will help ensure that I am providing the most benefits for my students.
Referred to as “assessment of learning,” (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012, pg. 5) components of summative learning include evaluating, measuring, and making judgements about student knowledge, both on individual levels and group levels. Rather than supporting learning by way of formative assessment, summative assessment verifies learning, (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., Arter, 2012). Naturally, this is what interests educational stakeholders: administrators, parents, teachers, and those who create educational policies. (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012, pg. 5). Summative assessment historically and presently presents itself in the form of graded quizzes, tests, graded papers and presentations, district benchmark tests, state standardized tests, and college entrance
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
As teachers, we have to monitor the progress our students make each day, week, quarter and year. Classroom assessments are one of the most crucial educational tools for teachers. When assessments are properly developed and interpreted, they can help teachers better understand their students learning progress and needs, by providing the resources to collect evidence that indicates what information their students know and what skills they can perform. Assessments help teachers to not only identify and monitor learners’ strengths, weaknesses, learning and progress but also help them to better plan and conduct instruction. For these reasons, ongoing classroom assessment is the glue that binds teaching and learning together and allows educators to monitor their efficacy and student learning.
As I reflect on my past assessment process, I realized how much my assessments have changed over the years. In my early years, I used tests for informational recall as my assessments. I felt these were appropriate guidelines in which I needed to follow in order to substantiate a student’s grade. Every assignment or tests was given a point value and then based on the amount of points, a grade was given. Every student’s assessment was exactly the same, and the assessments did not contain any subjectivity. I felt confident in giving the grade based on a valid point system. However reflecting back, I see that I did not include any performance-based assessments or individual learning styles in my early assessment. I also did not take into consideration the individual needs of my students. My assessment approach was awful. I am embarrassed that I use to assess students in this manner.